Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[EE THr]

That's right Art.

The other part of that is to help anyone that has already got one to get to the point of recouping their investment if possible.

I need to make up a cute little thing like, I call your bluff, try the SHO-NUFF

That would be good.

Or, even better, how about, "Let's prove that LRLs are all-eletronic by experimenting with dowsing rods."

Because that's what you are trying to do.

Duh.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

by experimenting with dowsing rods."

Your term not ours..Always wrong EE..Art

 

[EE THr]

by experimenting with dowsing rods."

Your term not ours..Always wrong EE..Art

Prove it!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Let's be clear again.

We are talking about LRL --- long range locators. This includes the theorys, phenomenas, procedures, basic operation, and set up.

Now I know the "special" posters are finding any excuse and even going with some new ones, to justify not trying a free experiment, yet continuing to "demand" others do a test, which is not an experiment.

Do you see me demanding anything I'm stating the obvious, get real facts yourself before discussing things that are over your head. But the " I already know everything" problem is going to keep a few from it. We'll see who is just a talker.

Want me to guess??

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Get your facts straight. You are talking about DOWSING with coat hangers. Miles away from anything electronic.

Great gobs of foolishness

Still wrong SWR..He is talking about how people can become informed consumers..Art

 

[EE THr]

That's right Art.

The other part of that is to help anyone that has already got one to get to the point of recouping their investment if possible.

I need to make up a cute little thing like, I call your bluff, try the SHO-NUFF

Hey fenixdigger..anyone who owns a LRL should be able to pay for his hobby easily if they are willing to invest the time it takes to learn. We have given the rest the information to make them informed consumers….Art

Well, now...is that a straight-up #5, or what?

You people just don't care how obvious you are, do you?

Good Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawd!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Art; That one little thing wraps it up, "over your heads". I'm sure they missed the part about "most" lrl users were skeptics of that concept.

You would have to be a fool not to be skeptical of something you had never conceived possible. At the same time you would be a fool not to investigate it yourself and make a determination to the validity. Again, if it proved you could do it, you would be a fool not to accept the fact that was real. This is where the deeper problems surface.

By the way Art, how am I doing on my prediction of their next 10,000 posts?

Transference, it's not just for breakfast anymore. SHO-NUFF

 

[EE THr]

Art; That one little thing wraps it up, "over your heads". I'm sure they missed the part about "most" lrl users were skeptics of that concept.

You would have to be a fool not to be skeptical of something you had never conceived possible. At the same time you would be a fool not to investigate it yourself and make a determination to the validity. Again, if it proved you could do it, you would be a fool not to accept the fact that was real. This is where the deeper problems surface.

By the way Art, how am I doing on my prediction of their next 10,000 posts?

Transference, it's not just for breakfast anymore. SHO-NUFF

Just had to resort to your idolized eugenics program, didn't you? Thanks for showing your true nature.

"...if it proved you could do it...." That's a real big "if." But how about this one: Even "if" someone could do it, News Flash!---That's dowsing. Maybe that's your problem; you don't know the difference.

Here goes.

LRLs are advertised with the inference that they are all-electronically-operated. Get it? That means you just turn it on, and it does it's thing. Like any other electronic equipment. Nowhere does it say you must be able to dowse. Probably because if it did say that, it would reveal the truth, that the electronics junk inside doesn't do anything at all. Get it now?

P.S. I have an old bent coathanger, with a transistor hot-glued to it, that I can sell to you for $5,000.00. Get it now?

And for an extra $500.00, I can send you the delux model, with three transistors hot-glued to it!

Can you hear me now?---Can you hear me now? Hello? Is anyone home in there? Wake up!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~ fenixdigger~

By the way Art, how am I doing on my prediction of their next 10,000 posts?

looks like you are right on
~SWR~

You'd have to be a fool to think bent coat hangers would replicate electronics in a lame DOWSING test.

Please tell us what showing how people can become informed consumers is a Dowsing test?

 

[EE THr]

~ fenixdigger~

By the way Art, how am I doing on my prediction of their next 10,000 posts?

looks like you are right on
~SWR~

You'd have to be a fool to think bent coat hangers would replicate electronics in a lame DOWSING test.

Please tell us what showing how people can become informed consumers is a Dowsing test?

OK, I will be glad to.


After you logically explain to me how a dowsing test belongs in an LRL forum.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Lame dowsing test? Did one of them really say that? Bless their little hearts. Close to being insulting.

Didn't understand a bit of the info I "guess" It was expected. Dowsing does not use a sample or a signal generator or an Examiner or any other electronic device to start the process. Any of these can be used in the experiment. BOO-YA

If this is too hard to understand, maybe fishing would be a better way to pass the time.


SHO-NUFF

 

[aarthrj3811]

Post #62 explains it...Art

#3, #6, #11,#22 Hike

 

[aarthrj3811]

Yes. Lame DOWSING test.

How would you know if it was a lame test or not ?

 

[aarthrj3811]

How would you know if it wasn't a lame test or not?

I spent my 10 minutes doing the test..Art

 

[EE THr]

Lame dowsing test? Did one of them really say that? Bless their little hearts. Close to being insulting.

Didn't understand a bit of the info I "guess" It was expected. Dowsing does not use a sample or a signal generator or an Examiner or any other electronic device to start the process. Any of these can be used in the experiment. BOO-YA

If this is too hard to understand, maybe fishing would be a better way to pass the time.


SHO-NUFF

Looks like the fenix brothers are talking to the air again.






They really should learn how to use the quote button.

But then they would have to admit that they don't really have me on ignore!

 

[fenixdigger]

Looks like I need to cut off that excuse exit.

A DOWSING TEST----Items required----L Rod or forked Tree limb. A dowser

Procedure---(Not really needed, above items should do)

Can all the folks here see the difference between this and the SHO-NUFF experiment? **** NO SIGNAL SOURCE****

Now if you boys can twist this around to make your justifications, everyone is going to laugh at you. ( again)

I was trying to make the experiment cheap and so simple a howler monkey could do it. But then again,,,,,

How's that compulsive response thing working out?

 

[aarthrj3811]

TreasureNet is about treasure hunting, metal detecting and prospecting. We expect our members to post messages generally related to these main topics.

 

[fenixdigger]

I am less than proud to announce an unexpected result of this experiment. Seems it has caused someone to scurry around and
drag up a lot of old posts (his mainly) to take attention away from the worming about a chance to get a clue. Sorry about that.

I think it is called Diffusion. So rare we did not spend a lot of time on it.

SHO-NUFF

 

[aarthrj3811]

I am less than proud to announce an unexpected result of this experiment. Seems it has caused someone to scurry around and
drag up a lot of old posts (his mainly) to take attention away from the worming about a chance to get a clue. Sorry about that.
I think it is called Diffusion. So rare we did not spend a lot of time on it.

Your right LT..I don’t think that they can use a LRL because they can not tell a LRL from a Dowsing rod..it is to bad they are going to miss out on all the fun..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

You know Art, as much thrashing around for 10,000 posts and bashing a lot of devices, you would think that someone would have realized that any MFD uses L rods which could be coat hangers. Or that an Examiner could be used for a MFD with L rods.

Of course possible feigning stupidity to escape reality. That's it ,,,, fugue !!!! Now it makes sense. That's what is driving everything,
flight from reality.

This forum is a ticket to fly. The experiment would be a disaster for one of them to try, Holy loose screws, Batman !!!

Best to let them call it dowsing, mousing, sousing, anything. We'll just post the results for the interested members.