Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[fenixdigger]

Re: Silver Dollar Test Results (modified format)
Reply To This Topic #64 Posted Jul 15, 2010, 05:35:24 AM

Man what an active thread! SWR--I was just letting you know that your investigative powers are not the only ones available, my mentioning that I could turn my firends loose meant that I too could get information on you and post it, that is no big deal. It sure does seem like you have to explain things like you were talking to an 11 year old here, someone is always ready to take offence or look for a threat. Sheeesshhh!

In a more friendly manner, it I didn't believe in something I sure wouldn't waist all my time writting negatives about it, I would post a message or two and then just go on my merry way.

Ted and SWR: Just wondering if you had tried one of these things out. You both seem so positive that it won't work...which seems funny since I have never mentioned the brand name of the device I have.

In a friendly gesture, would you like to see a demonstration? I am in a good humor today and am putting forth an olive branch here. I will be getting with Goodguy soon to do the test in a more prepared manner. I would appreciate your help (and anyone on the thread) in establishing an acceptable test procedure. (I thought GG's was a good one but I should have done sometings differnet in preparation). In the mean time if you would like to see this thing work (or not work ) I am willing to demo it for you. I live near Cincinnati and would be glad to have you come and see it...just PM me.


Here's the opening shot

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

Re: Silver Dollar Test Results (modified format)
Reply To This Topic #76 Posted Jul 15, 2010, 06:25:54 PM

Hide
Quote from: Curtis on Jul 15, 2010, 04:49:02 PM
SWR what area do youlive in...maybe I could come to your city and bring GG with me and we could have the test in your town at your site.

Also: if i accept the million dollar challenge will you come to see it?

Thanks...but, no thanks. I'll pass on the dowsing demonstration. Like I said....I'll wait for the reverse engineering report on the mechanics. The operating theory is already a known fringe theory. Typical pseudoscience, if you will


You sure did refuse the offer.

SHO-NUFF

 

[fenixdigger]

Prong;

Do you need me to send you 2 quarters?

 

[EE THr]

You don't understand that I have no interest in your imaginary activities.

It is a common psychological problem in that insecure people tend to project their personal deficiencies unto another in self defense, they are sure trying to pass theirs lack of knowledge over to you

This isn't a sick-ology forum, either.

If you want to give an amateur analysis, do it somewhere else.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

I knew better.

Were you able to read the part about the sample? This is a LRL of sorts. You don't have enough understanding at this point to grasp the point. Instead of the sample you can use a MFD, the Examiner, or a lot of others. I'm trying to keep this as cheap and simple as possible. If it is over you head, say so.

Maybe Art can help you.

EE; Remember I said I would not let them come on and make fun of you guys Getting selective memory also?

So, quit whining and try it. If you don't have the 2 quarters let me know. Here's your chance to really prove me wrong as I have already predicted the behavior pattern. SHO-NUFF

fenix(es)---

Your use of pronouns, and no references, makes it difficult to figure out what you're talking about.

This section is not about "LRLs of sorts," it's about LRLs.

You don't understand that I have no interest in your imaginary activities.

I think we (LRL opponents) are supposed to feel less intelligent because we refuse to take a dowsing test.

Somehow, fenix feels they have an upper-hand in the electronic LRL debate because nobody wants to dowse with bent coat hangers

But, you need to remember---they live in pretend-ville.

 

[EE THr]

Let's make sure I'm wrong. Did Curtis offer to come to you and demo a H 3? AND you told him NO.

Drop all your little excuses and try it. Be a big boy. All you have to do is say your scared and I'll understand.

This is using a signal (the sample) to locate.

Dowsing uses the rod and the dowser only. You know this, everybody sees through this little ploy.

SHO-NUFF

You know where you can put your coathangers.

Stick to LRLs.

Take the real test.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[pronghorn]

Prong;

Do you need me to send you 2 quarters?

Is that a trick question to cause me to reveal
my address so you can send me some pictures
of the massive treasure you find?

Do you need me to send you the list of excuses/alibis
that Curtis used when the test FAILED so you don't
use them again by mistake.

Heres one, don't test your LRL in a supposedly remote
field that you picked at random that just happpened
to be location where there was a facility that
supposedly processed silver compounds in the 50's
leaving too much silver in the ground causing too
much interference and multiple signals.

And don't use Curtis's wife's brother-in-law's relative
to comfirm the alibi, this person can only be used once
as a voucher, my rule. Good luck

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,335456.0.html

Thanks for reminding me of the lengths some people
go to explain failure, I needed a laugh.

PS Don't forget to set your LRL to the right frequency
for the compound of silver you will be using for your
next test.

 

[EE THr]

Re: Silver Dollar Test Results (modified format)
Reply To This Topic #76 Posted Jul 15, 2010, 06:25:54 PM

Hide
Quote from: Curtis on Jul 15, 2010, 04:49:02 PM
SWR what area do youlive in...maybe I could come to your city and bring GG with me and we could have the test in your town at your site.

Also: if i accept the million dollar challenge will you come to see it?

Thanks...but, no thanks. I'll pass on the dowsing demonstration. Like I said....I'll wait for the reverse engineering report on the mechanics. The operating theory is already a known fringe theory. Typical pseudoscience, if you will


You sure did refuse the offer.

SHO-NUFF

Like Prong says, take Carl's test. Even if it cost you five grand in travel and lodging, you'll still arrive home with a cool $20,000.00. How could you complain about that?

If you pass Carl's test, I'll do your coathanger test, and video it, and post it too!

Do we have a deal?

If not, then quit whining about it....





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

You guys are a laugh riot.

Those posts are one of the best collections of excuses and dodges yet.

Really shows 1) No clue about the differences 2) No desire to find any real truths 3)Strong need to be confrontational

4) __________ ( I'll let someone else fill in this one)

Sorry guys, I thought this would help, but I see you are stuck where you are at. I'll still post the results of the field tests

later. Looks like I'm putting you back on ignore so don't bother to try it.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey LT..They are sure trying to keep honest hard working Treasure Hunters from receiving good information. It is part of what they think is their job. When we tell people how to become good consumers they get irrate..Yesterday EE told us he was not going to buy a LRL. I gave him 3 options that would be free . Try it he will not..then the same crapola started…they seem to like treating treasure hunters like they treat Mushrooms..Keep then in the dark and feet them B/S..Art

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

come down here if you want to see a test, otherwise --- !.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[fenixdigger]

Well Art;

All you can do is try. When someone describes something that I can reproduce, I get on it.

I guess that's the difference between doers and talkers.

The people that I communicate with, all try the experiments we each come up with. This has lead

to the changes I sent you.

I guess it's impossible for them to grasp, that we were once of the same opinion they are now.

They want to make it out that there are 2 opposing sides to this topic, when there is only 1 side.

We are just out in front. We worked our way up. They are too lazy to even spend 10 minutes.

That says a lot. And did I hear someone say he did refuse a personal demo? Back on ignore.

 

[EE THr]

fenix(es) & artie---

Like I said before (but got now answer, naturally!)---

If you pass Carl's test, I'll do your coathanger test, and video it, and post it too!

Do we have a deal?

If not, then quit whining about it....

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

ike I said before (but got now answer, naturally!)---
If you pass Carl's test, I'll do your coathanger test, and video it, and post it too!

It is called an experiment
You do not need to take the experiment but informed consumers should..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Art; If they are scared they should say so. all this other stuff just makes them look more foolish ( if that's possible) to anyone that reads the posts.

You should see the emails. This has really made them show their colors. Let me know if one of them man's up and says he's scared
to try, or too handicapped to get out.

Our friend in Mobile has been out with the changes we made and reports are impressive. I may ask him to give this experiment a try.

 

[EE THr]

Art; If they are scared they should say so. all this other stuff just makes them look more foolish ( if that's possible) to anyone that reads the posts.

You should see the emails. This has really made them show their colors. Let me know if one of them man's up and says he's scared
to try, or too handicapped to get out.

Our friend in Mobile has been out with the changes we made and reports are impressive. I may ask him to give this experiment a try.

I guess it's really true, you acutally can't read!

fenix(es) & artie---

Like I said before (but got now answer, naturally!)---

If you pass Carl's test, I'll do your coathanger test, and video it, and post it too!

Do we have a deal?

If not, then quit whining about it....

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Obviously. How many times does one have to post they have no interest in DOWSING before they give up?

All I see is an attempt to stop us from making Treasure Hunters in to informed consumers..

 

[EE THr]

Obviously. How many times does one have to post they have no interest in DOWSING before they give up?

All I see is an attempt to stop us from making Treasure Hunters in to informed consumers..

And I suppose that you claim to be doing that, free of charge, to the LRL manufacturers and distributors?

At this point, I doubt that you could convince very many people about that!

If you really wanted to provide information, you would simply take Carl's test, and take home $20 Grand, after expenses.

Get real.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

That's right Art.

The other part of that is to help anyone that has already got one to get to the point of recouping their investment if possible.

I need to make up a cute little thing like, I call your bluff, try the SHO-NUFF

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey fenixdigger..anyone who owns a LRL should be able to pay for his hobby easily if they are willing to invest the time it takes to learn. We have given the rest the information to make them informed consumers….Art