Life's been getting in the way of my participating on this forum. As most of you will recall, I'd posted the above some time ago (page 2 of this thread), and there was some discussion on how many thought John Spring's version of the Doc Thorne story was more believable than the others. I share that view, that it
sounds more believable than the others.
I've done considerable research on the Doc Thorne story, and in the course of that have encountered incontrovertible proof that the story as it's been handed down, just can't be true. I'll post most of that evidence as time allows. I'll say up front, that I believe the core of the story is most likely true...that Doc Thorne saw what he believed was a rich deposit of gold somewhere to the east of Ft. McDowell...and thus, I believe it's worth investigating the story...but some level of fact must be discerned from the stories before anyone has any hope of finding it...assuming there's any detectable gold left on the surface, at this late date.
Back to John Spring and his article. Spring wrote many such articles for a veteran's newspaper, and I believe he knew most of what he was writing was campfire BS. Most of the old-time AZ storytellers, of which Spring was one, did this all the time. His articles were pure entertainment, a lot of truth to them, but yarns nonetheless. He was trying to entertain folks, and provide fodder for newspapers and magazines so they could sell papers and increase their advertising revenue.
Was Spring telling the truth about meeting Doc Thorne in Sonora, and that's how he came by the story? No, he wasn't telling the truth about that. Spring copied most of his article, sometimes almost word for word, from an earlier article (1890). I doubt anyone can truly confirm that the 1890 article was the very first time this
particular info had appeared in a newspaper, but it's the earliest I can find.
It's clear to me that John Spring copied most of his story from the earlier article... again... sometimes word for word... and then passed it off as something he had heard from Doc Thorne himself. Here's the article, for those who are interested. Compare it to Spring's article, line by line.
View attachment 1947718