Did a Sawpit start the Legend?

[Crow]

This is common mistake being made by the latest batch of historians in universities today. Because universities are increasingly profit driven. Then churn people out with degrees. Especially in humanities department.

The humanities history professor have to publish their own work every year and then mark student thesis. Professors are under increasing pressure to mark various thesis some times 30 -40 papers with thousands pages thesis to read . Which is incredibly time consuming hunting down references. Often references are overlooked because of time constraints. So what has happened identity politics have seemed to have into Historical research dictated by cognitive bias.

In many papers we get references quoted? We only get the authors interpretation of what is being said and not what actually is being said.

So some times things that are claimed fact are not facts at all.

Some times they use other peoples research with out fact checking the reference they give.


That is why researching is very hard.

Crow

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges - Grab it through Amazon!

[Crow]

Another thing oral histories are plagued with inaccuracies. For an example my dear old mother's as honest as honest could be.

Her oral history told to me as child gradually changed over time, as she gold older and her cognitive memory declined. She added and deleted things and the subconscious imagination starting filling the gaps posing as memory.

This is common and happens to us all over time.
Add that to several generations of cognitive decline in in retelling a story in which memories add things without realizing it. So oral history is vertually worthless.

All we get in archives are a date of what was claimed at at a given time. Birth death and Marriage records as we land tax and other records can help build a picture of what was happening at a time.

The trouble with oak island story its been polluted with asumptions presented as facts. Go to archives you discover there is not as much as claimed.

Crow

 

[TruthbeTold]

Actual facts always get in the way of a fictional treasure story.

 

[Crow]

Actual facts always get in the way of a fictional treasure story.

The fact remains people did search for treasure but everything got blown out proportion. Oak Island is not the only example.

Like The Dutchman story is another blown entirely out of proportion to become folklore in itself. Hell both of great stories legends etc..a great yarn

I am one of those crazy anal people actually has the time to research them.

I spent 40 such years research stories all over the world. 99% are just stories. but there are some that are the real deal.

Crow

 

[Crow]

Armchair

In ancestory.com website. A poster Posted 17 Mar 2022 by kashina claims the following.

Lot 1

· 1785- John Cochrane to Alexander Pattillo

· 1794- Donald McGinnis

· 1859- James McInnis

Lot 2

· 1780- Edward Smith to Robert Melvin

· 1819- David Vaughan

Lot 3

· 1832- David Vaughan to Daniel McInnis

Lot 4

· 1786- John Kinghorn to Alexander McNeill

· 1793- John Martin to Anthony Vaughn

· 1804- Thomas Embree

· 1807- George Bezanson

· 1809- Anthony Vaughn

· 1831- James McInnis

Lot 5

· Before 1809- James Vaughan

· 1809- Est James Vaughan to David Vaughan

· 1832- Anthony Graves

Lot 6 ***

· 1768- Phillip Payzant to Robert Melvin

· 1811 Jacob Shephard to Nathanial Melvin

· 1812- Samuel Ball

Lot 7 ***

· 1767- John Secombe to Robert Melvin

· 1811- Jacob Shepard to Nathaniel Melvin

· 1812- Samuel Ball

Lot 8 ***

· 1784- Jonathon Prescott to Robert Melvin

· 1798- Samuel Ball

Lot 9

· 1793- Martin Marshall to Neal McMullen

Lot 10

· 1793- Martin Marshall to Neal McMullen

Lot 11

· 1781- James Webber to Daniel Vaughan

· 1789- Neal McMullen

Lot 12

· 1781- James Monro to Robert Melvin

Lot 13

· 1790- Robert Vaughan to Nathaniel Melvin

· 1806- Neal McMullen

Lot 14

· 1701- James Webber to Daniel Vaughan

· 1790- Nathaniel Melvin

· 1806- Neal McMullen

· 1818- David Melvin

Lot 15

· 1818- Grant to David W. Crandall

· 1819- John Smith

Lot 16

· 1798- Mary Malay to John Smith

Lot 17

· 1790- Anthony Vaughan to Nathaniel Melvin

· 1806- John Smith

Lot 18

· 1795- Casper Wallenhaupt to John Smith

Lot 19

· 1768- Edward smith to Timothy Zink

· 1819- Est James Vaughan to David Vaughan

· 1825- John Smith

Lot 20

· 1791- Alex McNeil to Edward James

· 1797 John Bezanson

· 1807- John Smith

Lot 21

· 1791- Alex McNeal to Edward James

· 1859- Daniel McInnis to James McInnis

Lot 22 ***

· 1784- Jonathan Prescott to Robert Melvin

· 1796- Jacob Melvin to Daniel McKinnon

· 1807- John Bezanson to Samuel Ball

Lot 23

· 1784- William Bowie to Hector McLean

· 1788- Donald McInnis

Lot 24 ***

· 1785- Duncan Smith to Ambrose Peters

· 1791- John Munro

· 1799- Samuel Ball (including buildings)

Lot 25 ***

· 1787- William Hopkins to Samuel Ball

Lot 26 ***

· 1788 James Anderson to Samuel Ball

Lot 27

· 1778- Jeremiah Rogers to David Ellis

· 1791- Alexander Pattillo to Donald McInnis

Lot 28

· 1800- James Sharp to Donald McInnis

Lot 29

· 1766-Moses Holt

· 1778- David Ellis

· 1796- John Monro

Lot 30 ***

· John Pulsifer

· 1810- Samuel Ball

Lot 31 ***

· 1783- Jacob Hatt

· John Bezanson

· 1807- Samuel Ball

Lot 32 ***

· 1807John Bezanson

· 1809- Samuel Ball (Granted for Service to the King)



*** NB: Also owned by Samuel Ball

Hook Island

100 acre lot on mainland

Here is my beef The poster Gave in 2022 no reference to where they obtained the references. Did she or he copy them from Robots post or Did He Copy of Her?

And is it the same list?

Some thing to think about?

Crow

 

[Crow]

There same poster claims the following time line.

1755

(April) Slave traders capture young African woman, prepare her for shipment to South Carolina

(July 26) Slave traders Austin & Laurens hold auction, selling 203 Africans. Among them is a 16-year-old girl from the Gambia region of West Africa. Henry Laurens purchases the girl and names her Coomba Laurens.

1757

(October) Coomba Laurens first appears in Ball family records after Henry Austin deeds her to his brother-in-law, John Coming Ball.

1759

Coomba gives birth to first child, a boy John Coming Ball names “Stepney.”

1761

Coomba gives birth to second child, a boy John Coming Ball names “Sambo.” ...



Samuel Ball Property



Samuel Ball was born into slavery in South Carolina around 1761 and was given the last name of his owner. He escaped slavery during the Revolutionary War and joined the British forces in 1780. He served in New York and New Jersey and he found himself in Shelburne in 1783, where he apparently remained for two years. At some point he made his way to Chester.

An advertisement in 1791 by the Sierre Leone Company offered Black Loyalists free passage back to their home country. We can speculate that Samuel felt his life in Nova Scotia was much better than the potential hardship of an Atlantic crossing to a country he did not know.

In an 1809 petition for land he stated that he was a resident on Oak Island for 23 years (1786). He acquired Lot 25 in 1787 and Lot 26 in 1788. Samuel married in 1795 and he and his wife Mary had three children, two of whom died in infancy. Samuel Ball died on the island in 1846. There is no record of where he is buried.

The problem is with no proper references we do not know if it is true or some ones invented delusion or race based agenda?

Crow

 

[Crow]

Here is a BIO at find a a grave.

Born in South Carolina in 1765 to a very poor black family, Samuel was born into a life of misery, a hopeless life with no future. His family were in fact, slaves for the rich landlords of the infamous southern plantations.

Black men were offered promises by the British forces during the American Revolution and none were so promising than the chance for some land and to be free. Adopting the name of his former master, Ball went to New York serving with General Henry Clinton and then spent some time in the Jersey's where he served until the end of the war on January 14, 1784 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris. It was also reported that he served some time with Lord Cornwallis after the war. From here, Ball made his way to Shelburne Nova Scotia and lived there for two years.

Unhappy with his treatment in Shelburne, he then moved to Chester where it is reported he lived for 23 years. He bought a piece of land on Oak Island and then was granted 4 acres more at lot number 32. As time went on, he eventually owned around 100 acres of land, and an island called Hook Island, today called Sam's Island, along with his farm on Oak Island consisting of around 36 acres.

In 1795, Samuel Ball married a young woman, Mary, from Halifax who worked as a domestic for Treasurer Wallace. They had three children, Andrew (1798), Samuel (1801) and Mary (1805) all born in Chester. Among his many friends, he could count on one of the treasure hunters, Anthony Vaughan who was named as executor of his will. On Lot 25 on Oak Island, Samuel and his family built a house and worked the land, they broke it into ploughed acreage and raised crops. He also maintained cattle and made a good living on this famous island, cut firewood, and breathed the clear salty air. The foundation of his home can bee seen on Oak Island to today. Somewhere along the way, his wife Mary was no more, history does not record her passing or reason for the absence from the family. In his will of 1846 he speaks of his wife Catherine.

***********************************

1846. Will of Samuel Ball, Oak Island, Book 1, pg.37, Dated 1 Oct. 1841, Probated 5 Jan. 1846, wit. John Barkhouse Sr., James Brewer, George Keddy and John Zwicker, Gold River. Executors Rev. Joseph Dimock, Anthony Vaughan and wife Catherine. After funeral expenses etc.

I Give my wife, Catherine, the furniture, wearing apparel and all Real and Personal Estate during her life. First, situated and lying between lands owned by John Berghaus and Daniel Mc Innis, containing about 100 acres; also an Island called Hook Island containing 3 acres, all my farm at Oak Island containing ?? acres more or less. All Cultivated Land during her life and then to Mrs. Best until her
decease.

Grandson, Simeon, to have the half of the 100 acre lot between John Barkhouse and Daniel Mc Innis, the Ploughed Land, house and barn from John Mc Innis's line.

I give all my real estate and personal estate, the half of the 100 acre lot to my servant Isaac Butler, if he takes the name Ball, if he dies without male issue it is to go to friend Henry Joudrey's son, Alexander William, and if he dies without male issue to Isaac Parsons' son. None shall possess same unless they take the name Ball.

Mrs. Elizabeth Best to be comfortably maintained during her
life, and if she should survive his wife she is to have control of house and farm during her life.

If grandson dies without male issue the land results to Isaac Butler. After decease of wife and Mrs Best, the Executors to give cattle to the amount of £ 15 to the Bible Society.

Once again no sources no references.


Crow

 

[Crow]

Here is Balls marriage in Chester 1806.

Crow

 

[Crow]

In nova Scotia archives
in Census Returns, Assessment and Poll Tax Records 1767-1838.

Shows three mentions.

Oak Island, Lunenburg County — 1791
Chester, Lunenburg County — 1793
Chester, Lunenburg County — 1795

That is the only mention of him.

In nova Scotia archives.

Crow

 

[Crow]

Here is an alleged unverified document by the poster alleged descendant on Ancestry.

Its allegedly gives the properties Ball purchased. Is it real and not fabrication? It gives the prices paid for each property roughly around a 120 pounds in all. So if the about document genuine in which I am dubious. ( Not an archival document )

Then the notion that Ball bought land from a share treasure is just fanciful wishful thinking.

Ball Acquired his land over 35 years. The 100 pounds back money had acquired went a long way in paying for those properties.

Don't get me wrong Ball was success in way. He had done very well. But 120 pounds is long way off the mark of the alleged 2 million pounds?

Crow