Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 7,841
- Reaction score
- 9,872
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- DAKOTA TERRITORY
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
SANTA FE NEW MEXICAN said:ORO I am In agreement, and Here is what I Say, It is not running someone down, NOR their "beliefs", if someone, "Absolutely Anyone" else simply "Agrees" disagrees or is "Convinced" or not "Convinced of the same ideas" That Makes Perfect Sense.
However When people are mean, hateful, disrespectful, and consistantly disagree out of nothing but the sheer Continuous unending consistency to disagree!Then There Is A Fine Line That Is Being "CROSSED", No Pun Intended, And a red flag is raised to "the agenda" of the individual. Now on a positive note I am now convinced to find the truth, you must run the truth through a "fine tooth comb," or as a miner would say A "Fine Gold Sieve" Which is Fine But some people go "overboard." (You Know) They Take It To far. Every One should have the "right to present their presentation, case, or findings without feeling belittled or threatened. Friendly Joking is one thing and I approve that's Fine, but, "Inappropriate Childish Behaviour" In a what should be an Adult or Mature ((((""""Treasure "Locating" Public Forum"""")))) "Inappropriate Childish Behaviour" Now Thats Just (((("KIDD")))) Stuff. And That Is The Big Difference. Protecting A Few Mines Is One Thing. But Any One Being A Horses Arse, No Pun Intended, Is Absolutely "Uncalled For" In A "Treasure Locating Forum." Sincerely The OffSpring Of Carlos Quinto or Charles V. "And Yours Forever" John V. Kemm
Hola Santa Fe New Mexican;
Are you going to start with the name calling, simply because where you are seeing "horses" and "priests" some folks (like me) are seeing only completely natural topography? How is that going "over the line"? You can indeed see a "horse" shape, or a "heart" or a bird, or a dog, or an ox-head, etc it is too much like seeing castles in the clouds amigo. You may find those natural "shapes" to be wholly convincing evidence, but for me it is no different from seeing faces in clouds or Jesus on a piece of french toast. I am sorry that we can't seem to agree on how important such natural shapes are, but in the long run our disagreement on this point won't matter anyway since other types of proof can seal the case 100%.

Oroblanco

