rr-electricangel
Greenie
If an artifact is rare enough, the discovery is properly documented, and that discover knows the right people, then YES one could profit off a find. The trouble is, who's "owns" the land and whether or not the law is on your side are always the variables that come up the most to make any profit off a find worthwhile. With Travis you have a discovery that was kept a secret from the larger public (no media) and it was a discovery that happened by chance. What we researchers struggle with the most is whether or not the find is genuine. Mike (Gollum) has made some good arguments. No one can change a gut feeling about something. The more information you come across the more you can decide the genuineness of the discovery. That also makes a researcher very cautious at first. I'm definitely in that category. I believe in the stones as something other than a hoax or something that was faked. My apologies to Johney Steel, Noble Dwyer, W.B. Morris, Mexican bracero, and construction crew that didn't speak up after the 1964 Life magazine article came out. Those versions of the discovery story feel more like a campfire story or 'bar' talk to me than an actual occurrence. I could be wrong of course, but Travis clearly has the better hand.Theres only 1 reason to make the psm’s in the 1st place & that is to profit off of them…no other reason, theres just no need for a stone carving unless it was viewable. Also there is nothing pointing to the area they were supposeably found, so how would one return to the maps back then?….just my thoughts