deducer
Bronze Member
- Jan 7, 2014
- 2,284
- 4,378
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Members will post by our rules or lose the ability to post for awhile..
Are you going to edit the post and remove the lie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Members will post by our rules or lose the ability to post for awhile..
you should be thanking the moderator arthur....he probably saved you from a lawsuit...The below post is a complete lie. If it is not removed or retracted, I will be forced to defend myself:
it was ok for you to call me a liar...that's what our bet was about....i guess its ok for you to call someone a liar but nobody can call you one?Is it permissible for a poster to tell a lie about me?
Gentlemen end it or both are timed out. Last warning!
Then you should know that not every principal member of the family believe that Travis carved the H/P stone.
And that there is some good evidence to support her account, as given to me.
This is where it gets into the weeds for me. So we are to conclude that Travis carved the chimney and the galleon stone etc but didn't do the Peralta stones? Shouldn't we then conclude that he didn't carve the galleon stone and the chimney of the family home?
Are you saying that Travis carved part of the Peralta stones but not all? Thanks in advance, and an explanation of your why you reached those conclusions would be more than welcome too.
PS to Ed, quit offering to sell the info on your site, you know you would not sell it for love or money! Maybe if you got so crippled up that you could never get back there, but your prospecting blood wouldn't let you sell that site otherwise.
alan...the people that have spent the most time and energy looking into the doorstops didn't start out trying to prove they were fakes...they just came to the conclusion they are after all the evidence was uncoveredLet me add one more log to this fire
Is it not interesting that so much energy has been invested in the attempt to convince people that the PSM’s are fake?
why should anyone care if they are?
what better way to dissuade and even gleen information from other researchers than to discredit the work, as has been suggested numerous times here on this forum.
If it was something that he liked to do, then why did he and his uncle, Robert Tumlinson have a nasty falling out over the Stone Maps?
The falling out was so bad that Robert didn't know Travis had died until the FBI came to interview him in 1965 over the fallout with Mitchell/MOEN inc. IIRC.
Robert Tumlinson himself convinced his landlord, Dr. Gene Davis, in 1956 to finance several personal trips to the Superstitions. Why?
Thank you in advance.
You know the answer Arthur, no one would do all of that travel for a hoax, the stones are authenticStill no answer to the above questions. If someone wants to answer, feel free.
alan..knowing and admitting are two different thingsYou know the answer Arthur, no one would do all of that travel for a hoax, the stones are authentic
Assuming the Stone Maps are fake, then:
1. If TT (Travis Tumlinson) carved the stone maps himself, then why did he take almost a dozen secret trips into the Supers trying to solve them?
2. Why did he NEVER attempt to sell them?
How can anyone attempt to get inside of his head or anyone else's, unless he was keeping a daily diary/journal. Even then, something written in a diary might not truly reflect all that is going on inside the head.3. Why did he keep them (for the most part) a complete secret from 1949 until his death in 1961?
Again this question is built on another ASSUMPTION premise, that indeed Travis presented the stones to his uncle Robert for the purpose of finding the treasure(s) they allegedly lead to. Can we prove that Robert actually was using the stone maps to guide his searching?4. Since Robert Tumlinson was Travis' Uncle, then why would Travis have given him the stones and let him spend several years and much of his meager pension traveling to Arizona trying to solve them? (I would add to this, why did his uncle solicit his own landlord to invest in the trips? Note that the landlord demanded possession of the Stone Maps as collateral).
5. Since Clarence Mitchell was a family friend of the Tumlinsons, then why did he not know that Travis carved them?
6. Since Clarence Mitchell was a family friend, then why didn't Aileen tell him that Travis had carved the stones? (Clarence had repeatedly hounded Aileen after Travis died, until she finally agreed to sell the Stone Maps to him. The rumor that she yelled out "sucker!" to him after he drove away with the Stone Maps is completely unsubstantiated.)
7. If Mitchell knew that Travis had carved the stones, then why did he keep their existence a secret from 1961 until the Life Magazine Article came out in 1964?
Let me add one more log to this fire
Is it not interesting that so much energy has been invested in the attempt to convince people that the PSM’s are fake?
why should anyone care if they are?
what better way to dissuade and even gleen information from other researchers than to discredit the work, as has been suggested numerous times here on this forum.
I did not accuse you of anything, if what I stated is correct, then everyone involved, including you, have been dupedThis is an extremely long winded reply to address several posts, so I have to ask your indulgence (again) and thanks in advance. If you don't care to wade through it, just skip to the end of this post.
Deducer wrote <quoting our mutual amigo Mike - Gollum>
That is making a huge assumption. We do NOT know what reason(s) Travis made said trips into the Superstitions, or really if he went there at all since none of us where there. He might have been searching for meteorites or arrowheads for all we know.
Deducer also wrote <and each quote following this>
How do we KNOW that he NEVER attempted to sell them? Maybe he didn't want to risk prison for selling frauds?
How can anyone attempt to get inside of his head or anyone else's, unless he was keeping a daily diary/journal. Even then, something written in a diary might not truly reflect all that is going on inside the head.
Again this question is built on another ASSUMPTION premise, that indeed Travis presented the stones to his uncle Robert for the purpose of finding the treasure(s) they allegedly lead to. Can we prove that Robert actually was using the stone maps to guide his searching?
We can not KNOW the answer to this either, since we don't know what motivates anyone really. There are some obvious reasons though, like fraud. Or lying on the part of Clarence is also possible, perhaps he DID know that Travis was the engraver of the stones? Quien sabe?
This is yet another exercise in trying to GUESS what some people whom are not alive today to answer. We simply can not know the answers to this since none of us were present, pro or con.
Another question relating to personal motivations which we can not possibly answer since none of us were there and none of us could speak for the motivations, reasons or logic of Mitchell. I would offer an alternative question here, and invite anyone to answer it - if Mitchell believed those stone maps were the genuine article, WHY on Earth would he agree to allow the photos to be published in a national magazine? He wanted competitors, maybe? If you had possession of maps to treasure(s) and you believed the maps to be genuine, would you allow a national magazine to publish photos of the maps? I sure wouldn't, at least not until AFTER I had found the treasure!
Alan M wrote
Clearly you haven't read all of my posts, or you would not cast such an accusation. I do not attempt to dissuade people from hunting for treasures. I do not like it when treasure hunters are being misled by false, phony and fraudulent information. In this category I would add that ALL of the treasure maps (supposed) that are in the public circulation, and there are literally dozens of such maps not just the stone maps, are highly suspect and likely fraudulent or at the least, fatally erroneous. Now add to this factor, that people have died in the Superstition mountains, while searching for treasures. I for one do not care to have more people added to the search and rescue list whom were following fraudulent maps. Besides, that 'info' you refer to as being harvested, is mainly the logic and assumptions of the believers, and since no two of the stone map solvers lead to the same place, just how valuable is that info? Do you think that I am going to secretly write it all down and sneak into the Superstitions to the site someone posted on the forum? Don't hold your breath waiting for that moment to arrive.
Homar your logic and explanation are good, but flawed. It still looks very questionable that Travis was carving SOME stones but allegedly found the others. I won't say impossible, but if a music composer should suddenly claim he found a lost composure of Mozart, it would be pretty questionable wouldn't you think? I hope your conclusions are correct, and that it will lead you to finding a huge treasure some day - and that you will come back to rub my nose in it with photos of the treasure. It won't bother me at all and I really hope you do find it.
Good luck and good hunting amigos, I hope you all find the treasures that you seek.
Oroblanco
I did not accuse you of anything, if what I stated is correct, then everyone involved, including you, have been duped
Let me add one more log to this fire
Is it not interesting that so much energy has been invested in the attempt to convince people that the PSM’s are fake?
why should anyone care if they are?
what better way to dissuade and even gleen information from other researchers than to discredit the work, as has been suggested numerous times here on this forum.
You posted this earlier, quote
Since I am one of the guys arguing against the Peralta Stones authenticity, this is an accusation that I am among those whom are deceptively trying to glean information from the 'true believers' by demanding to see their proof. It is an accusation - but no worries, I wasn't taking it as an insult as I don't think it was intended as an insult. Of course if it was intended as an insult, please enlighten me.
QUOTE]
No insult was intended,
among the whole group of people arguing for the stones as a hoax, the person doing the gleening would remain mostly quiet. Letting others make the demands for proof as well as argue the veracity of claims made by someone with “First hand information”
your argument against the stones is valid, as long as you believe in your information, it is the information and its root source which I call into question, because, the stone maps lead to an area where there is a lot more evidence, evidence which Travis could not have fabricated.