Rebel - KGC said:
Rebel - KGC said:

Wasn't attacking, just having some fun. Personally, I like you good natured fellas.

But I think if you'll refer to the Beale Pamphlet you'll discover that "Beale" and "several of his friends" set upon gathering no less then thirty men, who, in order to be stated into the party, would have to meet certain requirements and "sign" an agreement.
Going back to the thirty portions that remained after Morriss took his "single share", these were to be distributed "in equal shares". Keep that in mind.
Throughout the story the "party" is "seperated" many times, and the listed transfers were brought back by only a "portion" of the party. Nowhere in the story or letters is it stated that there will be thirty names and residences in C3, only that the treasure was to be divided into 31 equal shares and distributed to the names on the list. So, "could be" that there are only "ten names" on that list, each to be given three equal shares. "Perhaps"....the remaining "signed on" members of the party had already been given their "agreed shares."
Again, NOWHERE in the Pamphlet or letters is it stated that C3 will contain thirty names.
Ask yourself this question: If all of the men in the party were from the Bedford area, then why didn't they all come back with each of the transfers and to winter in Virginia? Even in Beale's letter to Morriss he explains that, "parties you have never heard of or met". This letter was written after Beale showed up at Morriss' stay in the company of other men, so if these men, "who Morriss had seen", were not members to Beale's party, then, "who were they?" And given Morriss' business and stated popularity in the region, how is it that Beale was so confident that Morriss had, "never heard of or met" any of the men in the party. And this is all the "food for thought" I'm putting out here, what you do with it and where you go with it is up to you.
