bigscoop
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,541
- Reaction score
- 9,078
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Wherever there be treasure!
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #121
Thread Owner
I see, you are upset that they are not showing you how they decoded the papers and they will not tell you were the treasure is. I see,![]()
You are simply copping out on the debate you keep pursuing because you have absolutely nothing of reasonable significance to debate with. That much is easy to see as you continue to display this same general behavior. Dodge-ball is a game that is usually played by those who don't want to get hit with the ball.

Crypto,
Now I know I'm not very knowledgeable on the subject, but, to my knowledge, and to date over the years, there are two theories out there that harbor extremely strong “circumstantial evidence”, one of these in support of the tale while the other is in opposition of the tale. But here's the thing with both of these, despite all efforts by some of the best in business both of these theories still lack that all-important and required document of, direct implication. Without this document source as reference then both of these extremely strong theories still reside as just two more existing theories that lack the required muscle in order to turn them into something conclusive.
What do we mean by, direct implication? As example this might be a discovered letter that directly implicates Beale or Morriss in the secret transfer of enormous wealth, or one that directly references the huge stash of existing wealth in Bedford County, Virgina, from an established involved source, etc., etc., etc. This might also include a letter or written concern regarding the extended absence of 30 men who set out for the west from the Bedford area during the effected period that directly references Beale, etc., etc., etc.
I can tell you that there are some older writings in existence that do reference secret transfers of wealth from west to east during the period, a few of these even references names, but sadly they do not directly reference anyone implicated in the Beale Papers, nor do they reference Bedford, County, Virginia, only Richmond. In fact, the referenced dates of transfer even correlate with the dates of deposit offered in the Beale Pamphlet. Yet, there is still no direct implication of those who are referenced in that pamphlet story. So where is the required connection? Sadly, it still fails to exist, which means that the theorist could just as easily be completely inaccurate in his otherwise seemingly strong proposal of possible solution. “Direct Implication”, it is a must! Without it we hold nothing other then pure conjecture and speculation that is most likely wrong and a simple product of our own stubborn determination and fleeting imagination.
Both Jean and Eldo, and many others, lack this factor of required direct implication. Someday I hope someone discovers such a source.
Last edited: