Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

[EE THr]

So maybe one of these whizz kids will take the Sho-Nuff test. Heck I'll even send them the paper towels and silver quarters if they can't afford them.

That's right, I offer a simple test and then offer to fund it. Who could refuse that offer?

I'll make a Guess. (Actually I'm not guessing, the psychosis profile demands a certain, or lack of, responses). Watch what happens.

Your test has nothing to do with LRLs. It's dowsing, which in not in this topic or section. So don't bother trying to push your little nonsense test here.

I see you are also a proponent of eugenics. Do you idolize their plan to kill off 90% of the population? Do you hope to be cheering as all those the men, women, and children are snuffed?

That's real Sick-ology.

How do you know that you won't be one of the first to go?







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Cry Of The Eagle: History And Legends Of The Cherokee Indians And Their Buried Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

I'm actually glad I clicked show on this one. What a load of horse hocky. You have really went out on the limb and sawed it off.

Idolized that bunch, skeptic please.

So I guess(snicker) this means you can't do the experiment. It is not dowsing as it is part of using a Mfd. If you have a signal generator, use it instead of the sample.

Dowsing uses the dowser and the rod. Is that too complicated. I wish there was a good excuse you could use other than you think it's dowsing. Ask the dowsers here. Then try it

I used this to lock a target over 20 miles away. Want proof?? Go out in the yard and start getting it.

SHO-NUFF

 

[fenixdigger]

Let's keep this straight so you don't have any reason to dodge the experiment.

Dowsing involves 1) a dowser 2) a Rod

LRL uses 1) a signal of some sort 2) a rod of some sort 3) operator

Could one of the long time dowsers confirm this or am I wrong?

 

[EE THr]

I'm actually glad I clicked show on this one. What a load of horse hocky. You have really went out on the limb and sawed it off.

Idolized that bunch, skeptic please.

So I guess(snicker) this means you can't do the experiment. It is not dowsing as it is part of using a Mfd. If you have a signal generator, use it instead of the sample.

Dowsing uses the dowser and the rod. Is that too complicated. I wish there was a good excuse you could use other than you think it's dowsing. Ask the dowsers here. Then try it

I used this to lock a target over 20 miles away. Want proof?? Go out in the yard and start getting it.

SHO-NUFF

Keep your silly little test on your own thread, that's not what this one is about.

If you want to talk tests, go take Carl's, and quit trolling this thread.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~LT~

Dowsing involves 1) a dowser 2) a Rod

LRL uses 1) a signal of some sort 2) a rod of some sort 3) operator

Could one of the long time dowsers confirm this or am I wrong?

Correct LT..Many I add that one involves following a signal line produced by an object and the other involves following a man made signal..

 

[EE THr]

So far, the LRL promoters on here have totally failed to prove that LRL are anything more than, at best, simple dowsing with a bent coathanger or forked twig.

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~fenixdigger~

Let's keep this straight so you don't have any reason to dodge the experiment.
Dowsing involves 1) a dowser 2) a Rod
LRL uses 1) a signal of some sort 2) a rod of some sort 3) operator
Could one of the long time dowsers confirm this or am I wrong?

~Art~

Correct LT..Many I add that one involves following a signal line produced by an object and the other involves following a man made signal..

~EE~

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.

The question
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

It seems that that you do not understand what the subjects..Art

 

[EE THr]

~fenixdigger~

Let's keep this straight so you don't have any reason to dodge the experiment.
Dowsing involves 1) a dowser 2) a Rod
LRL uses 1) a signal of some sort 2) a rod of some sort 3) operator
Could one of the long time dowsers confirm this or am I wrong?

~Art~

Correct LT..Many I add that one involves following a signal line produced by an object and the other involves following a man made signal..

~EE~

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.

The question
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

It seems that that you do not understand what the subjects..Art

Personal attack, in order to avoid the topic.

Score another prediction come true for me. 8)


Stick to the topic.

If you can prove that LRLs are anything more that mere dowsing, then do it.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

The question
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
It seems that that you do not understand what the subjects..Art

Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Reply To This Topic #157 Posted Today at 10:06:50 AM
Quote

Quote from: aarthrj3811 on Today at 09:58:56 AM
~fenixdigger~
Quote
Let's keep this straight so you don't have any reason to dodge the experiment.
Dowsing involves 1) a dowser 2) a Rod
LRL uses 1) a signal of some sort 2) a rod of some sort 3) operator
Could one of the long time dowsers confirm this or am I wrong?
~Art~
Quote
Correct LT..Many I add that one involves following a signal line produced by an object and the other involves following a man made signal..

~EE~
Quote
I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.
The question
Re: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

It seems that that you do not understand what the subjects..Art


Personal attack, in order to avoid the topic.

Score another prediction come true for me.


Stick to the topic.

If you can prove that LRLs are anything more that mere dowsing, then do it.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

So far, the LRL promoters on here have totally failed to prove that LRL are anything more than, at best, simple dowsing with a bent coathanger or forked twig.

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.

My prediction has come true again! Surprise, surprise! (Not!

artie---Thanks for proving me right. Again!

You are really making it easy for me. 8)






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

My prediction has come true again! Surprise, surprise! (Not!

artie---Thanks for proving me right. Again!

You are really making it easy for me.

No answer needed as most people can read and understand.. You are fast becoming a better LRL salesman than SWR..Art

April 1 survey..
8550 LRL and MFD users will go into the field and enjoy their hobby…
Soon to be 10,000 then 15,000 and then even more
And Millions of Dowsers will also be using their Dowsing rods

 

[EE THr]

My prediction has come true again! Surprise, surprise! (Not!

artie---Thanks for proving me right. Again!

You are really making it easy for me.

No answer needed as most people can read and understand.. You are fast becoming a better LRL salesman than SWR..Art

April 1 survey..
8550 LRL and MFD users will go into the field and enjoy their hobby…
Soon to be 10,000 then 15,000 and then even more
And Millions of Dowsers will also be using their Dowsing rods

Predicted off-topic, non-answer. #22 in the original post.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Just to get things back on topic---

So far, the LRL promoters on here have totally failed to prove that LRL are anything more than, at best, simple dowsing with a bent coathanger or forked twig.

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Yes you did perform a #22

 

[EE THr]

Yes you did perform a #22

Bingo!

Congratulations! It only took you 2 minutes and 51 seconds, to prove my prediction correct!


You're really on a roll today, artie!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

22. If on a forum, to stop further questions, the CA may also post nonsensical comments.

thank you for making my point

 

[EE THr]

thank you for making my point

artie---

Sorry, you don't have a point.

"22. If on a forum, to stop further on-topic questions, the CA may also post nonsensical comments."








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Just to get things back on topic (again)---

So far, the LRL promoters on here have totally failed to prove that LRL are anything more than, at best, simple dowsing with a bent coathanger or forked twig.

I predict that they will merely continue to engage in personal attacks, and other devious means of trying to change the subject, in order to avoid the truth.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

I wonder how we would prove this when we can't talk on the same level?

For the really interested; With a LRL, I have been able to lock a "target" at over 20 mi. under the right condition.

When I tried dowsing, 600 to 700 ft seemed to be the max. In all fairness the ground was different.

This would tell me the LRL had the range not to mention the other info you can get with the devices.

It would be best to use both of these in a hunt. Find the best dowser in your group and use him to verify targets up close.

Dowsing does not seem to be affected by electrical anomalies, so it would be more accurate up close.

 

[EE THr]

That's easy to say, fenixes, but the topic pertains to reality. If what you are saying is true, then you shouldn't have any trouble proving it, should you?

And while you're at it, you can pick up Carl's 25 Gs!







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?