Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Status
Not open for further replies.
afternoon EE you asked if I could give an example, k --

A) A con artist will appeal to your cupidity by direct and indirect references to logic and
expertise in the reasoning on how his unit will work, depite evidence to the contrary by
showing examples where users have gotten independentally wealthy.

B) He will also appeal to your exagerated sense of being an exceptionally intelligent person
that can actually see the tremendous advance in science that his unit represents.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That will be $2 or two cups of coffee with you seated on a comfortable chair in front of
the roaring fireplace discussing the possible level difference of intelligence of certain plant life.

Kin we invite jeff?

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
afternoon EE you asked if I could give an example, k --

A) A con artist will appeal to your cupidity by direct and indirect references to logic and
expertise in the reasoning on how his unit will work, depite evidence to the contrary by
showing examples where users have gotten independentally wealthy.

B) He will also appeal to your exagerated sense of being an exceptionally intelligent person
that can actually see the tremendous advance in science that his unit represents.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That will be $2 or two cups of coffee with you seated on a comfortable chair in front of
the roaring fireplace discussing the possible level difference of intelligence of certain plant life.

Kin we invite jeff?

Don Jose de La Mancha



I've got to admit, that was pretty good.

:coffee2: :coffee2:



:icon_scratch:

Yeah.
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
Evening randi sat & swr, it was posted --> They live for the tall tale.
************
Don't we all? if not, we wouldn't be in TN.

Don Jose de La Mancha



There has to be some reality somewhere, or you will end up in a rubber room.
 

If I were to offer advise to anyone, it would be, "Think for Yourself."

That's why we keep telling people how to become informed consumers..Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
If I were to offer advise to anyone, it would be, "Think for Yourself."

That's why we keep telling people how to become informed consumers..Art

My advice would be even shorter. Just "Think".
 

aarthrj3811 said:
If I were to offer advise to anyone, it would be, "Think for Yourself."

That's why we keep telling people how to become informed consumers..Art



If people are truly informed, they won't be consumers of LRLs.


:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Ho-Ho…Another answer using your personal insult list..Have you had an original thought in the past few months?
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Ho-Ho…Another answer using your personal insult list..Have you had an original thought in the past few months?


Gee, artie, that list of predictions would only be insulting to Con Artists.

Oh yeah---that's you!

Too bad.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick
A confidence trick or confidence game (also known as a bunko, con, flim flam, gaffle, grift, hustle, scam, scheme, swindle or bamboozle) is an attempt to defraud a person or group by gaining their confidence. The victim is known as the mark, the trickster is called a confidence man, con man, confidence trickster, grifter, or con artist, and any accomplices are known as plants. Confidence men or women exploit characteristics of the human psyche such as greed, both dishonesty and honesty, vanity, compassion, credulity, irresponsibility, naïveté, and the thought of trying to get something of value for nothing or for something far less valuable. Confidence men or women have victimized individuals from all walks of life.
~EE~
Gee, artie, that list of predictions would only be insulting to Con Artists.
Oh yeah---that's you!
Too bad.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_trick
A confidence trick or confidence game (also known as a bunko, con, flim flam, gaffle, grift, hustle, scam, scheme, swindle or bamboozle) is an attempt to defraud a person or group by gaining their confidence. The victim is known as the mark, the trickster is called a confidence man, con man, confidence trickster, grifter, or con artist, and any accomplices are known as plants. Confidence men or women exploit characteristics of the human psyche such as greed, both dishonesty and honesty, vanity, compassion, credulity, irresponsibility, naïveté, and the thought of trying to get something of value for nothing or for something far less valuable. Confidence men or women have victimized individuals from all walks of life.
~EE~
Gee, artie, that list of predictions would only be insulting to Con Artists.
Oh yeah---that's you!
Too bad.




Thanks for confirming what I said.


:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Please list any experience that may validate your statements. Please keep this short and simple, no need to write a dictionary.

If the answer is none, just state that. Also state the length of time this experience has run if there is any. This refers to actual

experience, not articles, hearsay, rumors, and such.
 

fenixdigger said:
Please list any experience that may validate your statements. Please keep this short and simple, no need to write a dictionary.

If the answer is none, just state that. Also state the length of time this experience has run if there is any. This refers to actual

experience, not articles, hearsay, rumors, and such.



I thought you idiots had me on ignore?

Oh, just a few of you, and not the rest?

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:




The list stands unrefuted.

What part of it do you think is untrue?




:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Ah yes. You are on ignore. I did look at your reply. Just another test to confirm your condition. I will also look at SWeeties if he posts (also on ignore here and on other sites).

You have no idea how many people have both of you on ignore. Some that don't, use you for comic relief. If you were to see
the emails I get, you and SWeetie would slink off and hide. But, you condition will not allow this to be true in your mind and
a justification will spring up triggering a hateful response. I'll also look at that just to confirm it. That was a hard question<>

SHO-NUFF
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top