Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Status
Not open for further replies.
aarthrj3811 said:
Hint: Whenever the LRL promoters post personal insults or nonsense gibberish, rather than rationally answering questions, they are merely admitting that they are fakers, because they can't answer logically for that would expose then as liars.

Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Yes they are


You are right. They are also a Fairy Tale!

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

~EE~
You are right. They are also a Fairy Tale!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_tale
Fairy tale is a type of short narrative that typically features such folkloric characters, such as fairies, goblins, elves, trolls, dwarves, giants or gnomes, and usually magic or enchantments. However, only a small number of the stories refer to fairies. The stories may nonetheless be distinguished from other folk narratives such as legends (which generally involve belief in the veracity of the events described)[1] and explicitly moral tales, including beast fables.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
~EE~
You are right. They are also a Fairy Tale!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy_tale
Fairy tale is a type of short narrative that typically features such folkloric characters, such as fairies, goblins, elves, trolls, dwarves, giants or gnomes, and usually magic or enchantments. However, only a small number of the stories refer to fairies. The stories may nonetheless be distinguished from other folk narratives such as legends (which generally involve belief in the veracity of the events described)[1] and explicitly moral tales, including beast fables.


Ah, another prediction from the list comes true!

#22!

Thanks for your cooperation, artie!

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Ah, another prediction from the list comes true!
#22!
Thanks for your cooperation, artie!
No..Thank You again for providing us with a number instead of a discussion
 

Looks like he insulted again with his little list. Accusing you of his actions. Transference train is leaving,,, ALL ABOARD toot-toot



Hey, that would be a good nickname for our eel--- toot-toot Wonder if that is an insult???
 

Looks like he insulted again with his little list. Accusing you of his actions. Transference train is leaving,,, ALL ABOARD toot-toot
Hey, that would be a good nickname for our eel--- toot-toot Wonder if that is an insult???
Good diagnosis LT

It is a common psychological problem in that insecure people tend to project their personal deficiencies unto another in self defense, they are sure trying to pass theirs lack of knowledge over to you
 

fenixdigger said:
Looks like he insulted again with his little list. Accusing you of his actions. Transference train is leaving,,, ALL ABOARD toot-toot



Hey, that would be a good nickname for our eel--- toot-toot Wonder if that is an insult???


fenix brothers, you seem to be obsessed with me, as you prefer talking about me rather than the topic.

Well, you can forget it, because I'm not your type.

You are obviously just being a Troll.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

aarthrj3811 said:
You are obviously just being a Troll.
Wow...Three posts in a row..Art


More nonsense insults, more Trolling.

The Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

1. There is no standard electronics explanation for the devices ever working.
2. The movement of the swivel pointer or rods is not powered by the devices.
3. Makers and owners of these devices refuse to take a double blind test.
4. The proponent's only rebuttal is that they find what they are looking for. This, however is not being contested by items #1-3. The statement of this list is that the electronics add-ons, to what is merely a dowsing device, are not necessary, and are only there to charge high prices. This makes their reports of finding stuff a total Straw Man type of fallacy, and thus void as rebuttals to this list.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

You may be right EE..If it ever quits raining and snowing I will be trolling at the lake..Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Boring re post



More nonsense Trolling.

The Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

1. There is no standard electronics explanation for the devices ever working.
2. The movement of the swivel pointer or rods is not powered by the devices.
3. Makers and owners of these devices refuse to take a double blind test.
4. The proponent's only rebuttal is that they find what they are looking for. This, however is not being contested by items #1-3. The statement of this list is that the electronics add-ons, to what is merely a dowsing device, are not necessary, and are only there to charge high prices. This makes their reports of finding stuff a total Straw Man type of fallacy, and thus void as rebuttals to this list.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Yes they are. They save you time which amounts to more finds. They will find smaller objects at a greater distance than Dowsing will. Some will tell you the distance, depth and size of the target from the spot where you first find the signal and Dowsing will not..All in all they are good at what they were designed to do..Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Yes they are. They save you time which amounts to more finds. They will find smaller objects at a greater distance than Dowsing will. Some will tell you the distance, depth and size of the target from the spot where you first find the signal and Dowsing will not..All in all they are good at what they were designed to do..Art


If that were so, you would be anxious to prove it to the World.

But you avoid scientific testing, like the plague! But instead, you have shown your true colors by spamming any mention of legitimate testing. You have given yourself away, and exposed yourself for what you really are.

But the more you protest Science and real testing, the better for people to understand the truth about LRLs!

So all your nonsense is just as good as pointing out the non-functionality of your devices!

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Yes they are. They save you time which amounts to more finds. They will find smaller objects at a greater distance than Dowsing will. Some will tell you the distance, depth and size of the target from the spot where you first find the signal and Dowsing will not..All in all they are good at what they were designed to do..Art
~EE~
But you avoid scientific testing, like the plague! But instead, you have shown your true colors by spamming any mention of legitimate testing. You have given yourself away, and exposed yourself for what you really are.
I hate to keep making rerun posts…but…Where can a legitimate Double Blind be found?...Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Yes they are. They save you time which amounts to more finds. They will find smaller objects at a greater distance than Dowsing will. Some will tell you the distance, depth and size of the target from the spot where you first find the signal and Dowsing will not..All in all they are good at what they were designed to do..Art
~EE~
But you avoid scientific testing, like the plague! But instead, you have shown your true colors by spamming any mention of legitimate testing. You have given yourself away, and exposed yourself for what you really are.
I hate to keep making rerun posts…but…Where can a legitimate Double Blind be found?...Art


Double-blind describes an especially stringent way of conducting an experiment, usually on human subjects, in an attempt to eliminate subjective bias on the part of both experimental subjects and the experimenters. In most cases, double-blind experiments are held to achieve a higher standard of scientific rigor.


Quit whining about it, and just do it.

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof! And quit complaining about the truth, the facts, and reality!

P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Sure they are. They are a way to make a LOT of money once a real procedure is STOLEN. Still being the wheel man?
 

fenixdigger said:
Sure they are. They are a way to make a LOT of money once a real procedure is STOLEN. Still being the wheel man?


So, you and your imaginary "team" and friends are the only ones who really know how to use an LRL, and all the instructions that come with the devices are wrong. Not a very good marketing plan.

:sign13:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top