After 15th Episode of Season 12.... Still any believers...?

their domains had expired and their addresses were reclaimed and later i found that a couple of them had been taken over by the Lagina's\HC

Elaborate, please. I'd like to hear how you obtained that information (with no help from the audience).

--GT
 

The original site was called the “blockhouse blog”. It was filled with actual data, all of which refuted the show.

After the laginas purchased it, it became an oak island tours site.

Now it’s a site that backs the show’s claims.

They used the original site address:

https://www.theoakislandcompendium.com/

Someone here (gahzzak?) had a link to a data site that had backed up the original blockhouse blog site.

I’ll search for that and report back.
 

The original site was called the “blockhouse blog”. It was filled with actual data, all of which refuted the show.

After the laginas purchased it, it became an oak island tours site.

Now it’s a site that backs the show’s claims.

They used the original site address:

https://www.theoakislandcompendium.com/

Someone here (gahzzak?) had a link to a data site that had backed up the original blockhouse blog site.

I’ll search for that and report back.


Wow, I guess I've been de-plonked *. Okay, so let's parse this out ... so much to untangle here in terms of your misrepresentation.

I'm familiar with the Blockhouse Blog, and have read many interesting pieces there. It was at one time a part of the site oakislandcompendium.ca, and much of its content can be found through the internet archive's wayback machine, e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20160201110412/http://www.oakislandcompendium.ca/blockhouse-blog . A more complete archive (of the blog portion) seems to be the RSS feed cache that is available at https://blockhouse124.rssing.com/chan-63940472/index-page1.html . In no way could the content of this blog be summed as "all of which refuted the show". Does it present a more comprehensive deep dive into the various sub-mysteries, such as the so-called 90-foot stone, some of which complements what's presented on the show and some of which can at times be contradictory? Yep. As you'd expect from competent researchers who aren't reducing the material to easily digested voice-over narration for a TV audience. And one of those researchers and principal authors happens to be ... the show's own Doug Crowell. Most of the material in the blog seems to date from 2016 onwards, so the show was already a thing by then.

So what happened to the original Compendium? oakislandcompendium.ca did indeed change into a different site, around 2021, focused, apparently, on tourism. Does this equate to "The laginas bought it" ? Not without evidence, sir, and I see none here. As a shill for their biz on Oak Island it would be a very poor example, as it contains only one sentence about the production: "A popular TV series known as 'The Curse of Oak Island' is filmed on the island", accompanied by a static image that isn't even a clickable link back to the History Channel.

The Oak Island Compendium, New Edition, on the other hand, residing at the URL you provided https://www.theoakislandcompendium.com/ , is another content creator's homage to, and in the spirit of, the original Compendium, and has existed since at least 2023. To summarize its content as "backing the show's claims" is misleading at best. Yes, during the broadcast season they provide episode recaps that don't engage in the same negative histrionics that your usual sources subsist on, but the content is significantly deeper than that and from what I can tell represents the work of genuinely curious seekers who don't have a predetermined bias.

Normally I fault you for content-free nihilism. Now I'm faulting you for sloppy research and conspiratorial thinking. If you've got some smoking gun to back up your claims I'm all eyes and ears, but I won't hold my breath. Bring your data or be mocked.

--GT
________
* i.e. let out of the kill-file, for you youngsters.
 

I'm sure there are plenty of sites, and blogs of varying opinions and so called evidence of this that or the other about OI. Doesn't make it any more a fact then what the Lagina's are saying/showing..
 

This puts a huge dent in the story:

“The results were startling; no documents earlier than 1849 could be found. A review of the historical context and frequency of treasure tales in New England showed a marked propensity toward belief in the presence of buried gold in every locale. This, in conjunction with certain elements found in the Money Pit tale itself, indicate the story known to us today most likely started not in 1795 or even 1804, but in the 1840s. It likely began as a scam that used the massive California gold strike of 1849 as its basis, or perhaps as a mining operation gone wrong. It is also possible an early episode of treasure-digging near Chester N.S. in the late 18th century became the foundation for the story after it was altered and enhanced by others in the 1840s. Once published as newspaper articles in the 1860s the tale took root over the next half century, finally evolving into a legend that fed off its own history and artifacts. Each generation added its own twist to the tale while certain central themes remained intact.”

From the Preface found here:

https://www.criticalenquiry.org/oakisland/
 

All kinds of holes in that piece. Nothing that is pure fact has words in it like, It is also possible, It likely began as a scam, most likely started.. It's ironic that you don't want to believe anything that is written on or about this subject as fact but you believe this whole heartily.. So you believe that none of this story happened on OI until 1849, and 'maybe" even later? Is this just the 3 guys finding their digging spot, or all the other happenings on OI thru it's history that the show has provided for us with their discoveries...
 

Last edited:
All kinds of holes in that piece. Nothing that is pure fact has words in it like, It is also possible, It likely began as a scam, most likely started.. It's ironic that you don't want to believe anything that is written on or about this subject as fact but you believe this whole heartily.. So you believe that none of this story happened on OI until 1849, and 'maybe" even later? Is this just the 3 guys finding their digging spot, or all the other happenings on OI thru it's history that the show has provided for us with their discoveries...

1849 is when the fictional scam stories started and companies started looking for investors. That's documented history. There is not a documented history of a treasure ever been placed on oak island.

The only "discoveries" the show has found are common remnants of common human habitation. Nothing more.

If this is interesting to some then by all means enjoy it. No different than watching Antiques Road Show.
 

Last edited:
That's just the first known national story written about it. Doesn't mean the story from 1795 on is not true. Are you saying you do not believe the 3 guys started their dig in 1795? Do you not believe that the Onslow Company came in around 1802? Sounds like your saying yes to those questions and that everything before 1849 is a lie. I guess that means the 90' Stone being found in 1804 is a lie as well.. Fake or not.. How do you explain everything that happened before 1849? If it is all a lie then why have you made such a big deal out of the faked 90' stone, based on your time line it never existed..
 

That's just the first known national story written about it. Doesn't mean the story from 1795 on is not true. Are you saying you do not believe the 3 guys started their dig in 1795? Do you not believe that the Onslow Company came in around 1802? Sounds like your saying yes to those questions and that everything before 1849 is a lie. I guess that means the 90' Stone being found in 1804 is a lie as well.. Fake or not.. How do you explain everything that happened before 1849? If it is all a lie then why have you made such a big deal out of the faked 90' stone, based on your time line it never existed..
I personally believe the boys digging "for treasure" never happened. Maybe digging in loose soil possibly from a sinkhole to begin with. Maybe treasure spoke/added later for justification...? And that's IF it ever happened. The stone... faked.
 

So you think the 3 guys just decided to dig a hole to kill time and then later justified their wasted time by "saying" they were digging for treasure? It was a good enough lie to get the Onslow Company to come in right behind them and continue the dig to just kill time by your account...
 

So you think the 3 guys just decided to dig a hole to kill time and then later justified their wasted time by "saying" they were digging for treasure? It was a good enough lie to get the Onslow Company to come in right behind them and continue the dig to just kill time by your account...
Why would the boys dig for treasure anymore than the Onslow Company...? What would lead either of them to think something of value was buried at that spot? Maybe loose soil..?

I never said they were "killing time" you did. I suggested they found what they possibly thought was loose soil and wanted to see why? I guess both thought or were convinced a treasure was buried for some reason. Maybe they convinced themselves then others...? "Details" later followed maybe.

But we know nothing of value was found, recorded or shown to the world. Just continued search's and a belief to this day all based on 3 boys digging as the story goes.
 

If one believes the family descendents the boys found a treasure. If anyone did find it they probably wouldn't want to tell the world for any number of reasons.. Taxes, all the people who would want a cut, etc..
 

If one believes the family descendents the boys found a treasure. If anyone did find it they probably wouldn't want to tell the world for any number of reasons.. Taxes, all the people who would want a cut, etc..
Maybe they did...? But one reason not tell would not be because of taxes. But if others knew I'm sure some of them would want something from it.
 

That's just the first known national story written about it. Doesn't mean the story from 1795 on is not true. Are you saying you do not believe the 3 guys started their dig in 1795? Do you not believe that the Onslow Company came in around 1802? Sounds like your saying yes to those questions and that everything before 1849 is a lie. I guess that means the 90' Stone being found in 1804 is a lie as well.. Fake or not.. How do you explain everything that happened before 1849? If it is all a lie then why have you made such a big deal out of the faked 90' stone, based on your time line it never existed..
I've always stated that the 90 foot stone was a creation of the scammers to milk more money out of investors when the dig was producing nothing and investors had lost interest.
 

That's true,
Maybe they did...? But one reason not tell would not be because of taxes. But if others knew I'm sure some of them would want something from it.
But you see why/how it might have been found, yet no one has heard about it.
 

I've always stated that the 90 foot stone was a creation of the scammers to milk more money out of investors when the dig was producing nothing and investors had lost interest.
So you do believe stuff happened before anything was written about it in 1849. How could that be and nothing be written about it.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom