Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all the endless speculation of maybe, could have is pushed aside, it all comes back to James Beverly Ward and his real motivation to copyright and publish the Beale Papers.
Franklin, the source of that encounter is only in the HART PAPERS, there in NO outside collaborating evidence to prove that this meeting ever actually happened.
Just like Morriss telling the story to the "unknown" author and this "unknown" author contacting Ward, it is only the authors word, and that is not proof of anything.
Both would be considered fruit from the poisoned tree.
Now if you want to mention what Charles W Button stated, or Adeline Ward McVeigh told reporter Martha Rivers Adams, or what Pascal Buford's children stated, that would be a more reliable source but that would be contrary to what you want to here.
All those links have been posted on several threads.
You consider anyone who posts information counter to the endless misinformation posted as fact on these Beale threads as negative.
No one, not even you, Franklin, has ever posted definitive proof of anything in the Beale Papers as actually ever happening.
Maybe, could be, lore, and hearsay are not facts, but posted quotes by those who in one way or another were involved with the Beale story, be it Button, McVeigh, the Friedmans, Faucett, Mateer, or the researcher at the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, are opinions based on fact, not maybe, could be, hearsay or lore.
You can not even definitively prove who the Thomas J Beale of the job pamphlet was, or if he really existed outside of Ward's dime novel story, hence the Thomas Read Massacre by Sheriff Otey and the Luck family story you once claimed as the TRUE story behind the Beale Papers.
My comments were never posted to upset the delicate balance of lore, hearsay, maybe, could be misinformation some hold fast as fact.
Your friend, BUCKO
I have contributed the history and background of those who were involved with or were named in the Beale story, the comments of professionals in various fields concerning the validity of the Beale story and the total lack of any evidence outside of the job pamphlet that can prove anything within the Beale narrative story ever occurred.... You are contributing nothing but jumping on everyone wanting proof...
I have contributed the history and background of those who were involved with or were named in the Beale story, the comments of professionals in various fields concerning the validity of the Beale story and the total lack of any evidence outside of the job pamphlet that can prove anything within the Beale narrative story ever occurred.
Your contributions seem to be all maybe, could be, hearsay lore and currently jumping on me because my information which CAN be verified by research doesn't support the posted lore that runs rampant on this thread.
Time would be better spent by those that dislike my posts to post one undeniable documented connection that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Beale story in Ward's published pamphlet is true...
...but it is much easier just to whine and complain about my posts.
...and that becomes very obvious when one scrutinizes several of your posts.One last time. It is not my job to lay facts out there to prove or disprove whether the Beale Treasure is true or not...