miboje: Does AF mean "at the end", meaning this is the last marker? sdcfia: There are many petroglyphs in the lower Rio Grande Valley region of NM that depict North African symbology, but it is impossible to date them conclusively. The best evidence I've seen is Mystery Mountain west of Los Lunas NM. The Decalogue Stone on the table is the obvious focus for most people and its authenticity will forever be denied by academia, as is the case with all artifacts that don't fit the Narrative. IMO, the structural ruins on top of the table are more attractive. The layout of the settlement upstairs matches strongly with ruins of similar military camps found throughout the Middle East. These are clearly not "Indian ruins" in the Anasazi style, and are rarely if ever discussed by pointy heads. I have two problems with pareidolia based "ancient carvings" - heads, faces, animals, shadow casters, et al. First, a building operation that reshapes a mountain, even in ancient times, will leave evidence of the work, lots of it. There will be tool marks, exposed erosion boundaries, massive accumulations of debris, etc. I haven't seen anyone demonstrate any of this in any of the claimed locations. With smaller objects, such as carved heads or animals, the evidence should be even easier to find, as the necessary details should be clearly evident on the rock surfaces. I've only seen one example of a rock being manipulated to look more like the object it appeared to be, and I've found and checked it myself. Tool marks and exposed fresh surfaces on this dog's ear, eye and muzzle proved to me that someone had improved it. Even if a rock causes a familiar shape, no one bothers to verify, even with the slightest evidence, that the thing is not just another "apparent" rock, and there is certainly no shortage of it. Why not check the claims? Because there is no evidence. When people start proving that "carved rocks" or "shaped mountains" are really improved, maybe the rest of us will start to take them more seriously. Second point. If these ancient sculptors were so skilled, then why is the quality of their New World carvings so appallingly poor compared to the work they did in the Old World? The carvings and inscriptions from thousands of years old cultures around the world are clearly man-made, beautifully and meticulously crafted, and obviously long lasting. However, here in the US today, we see vague rocks that look like this or that, especially if you squint and use your imagination and hear they're man-made. Why aren't they more clearly formed and detailed, and maybe even inscribed as well? If beautiful carved monuments were good enough for Egypt, the Middle East and the Andes, why not the US? I'm new here and in the search for treasures, here I found a mountain of stone in which it has the shape of an alligator, it was carved in specific points for the alligator shape, I have proof of that because there are several pieces of stones around, showing that they were removed from the points where they were carved to shape the alligator. especially if you squint and use your imagination and hear they are man made. Why aren't they more clearly formed and detailed, and maybe even inscribed as well? If beautiful carved monuments were good enough for Egypt, the Middle East and the Andes, why not the US? I'm new here and in the search for treasures, here I found a mountain of stone in which it has the shape of an alligator, it was carved in specific points for the alligator shape, I have proof of that because there are several pieces of stones around, showing that they were removed from the points where they were carved to shape the alligator. especially if you squint and use your imagination and hear they are man made. Why aren't they more clearly formed and detailed, and maybe even inscribed as well? If beautiful carved monuments were good enough for Egypt, the Middle East and the Andes, why not the US? I'm new here and in the search for treasures, here I found a mountain of stone in which it has the shape of an alligator, it was carved in specific points for the alligator shape, I have proof of that because there are several pieces of stones around, showing that they were removed from the points where they were carved to shape the alligator. why not the US? I'm new here and in the search for treasures, here I found a mountain of stone in which it has the shape of an alligator, it was carved in specific points for the alligator shape, I have proof of that because there are several pieces of stones around, showing that they were removed from the points where they were carved to shape the alligator. why not the US? I'm new here and in the search for treasures, here I found a mountain of stone in which it has the shape of an alligator, it was carved in specific points for the alligator shape, I have proof of that because there are several pieces of stones around, showing that they were removed from the points where they were carved to shape the alligator.
