2nd Amendment Forum Threads & Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
⛮ Administrator
⛭ Moderator
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
49,771
Reaction score
58,712
Golden Thread
0
Location
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
So there are no further misunderstandings....

The 2nd Amendment Forum was NOT open to debate if the 2nd amendment is good, or its relevance in today's world......

The 2nd amendment is already in the Bill of Rights of our Constitution.

This forum was opened to keep members informed of the new gun laws being proposed that attack the 2nd amendment, hence the name 2nd Amendment Watchdog....

The 2nd Amendment is NOT open for debate, or attack on this forum. The right of an American citizen to be armed under the 2nd Amendment is an established right in our Bill of Rights and our Constitution.

If some members wish to debate the relevance of the 2nd or if our right to keep and bear arms should be allowed then they should seek out another forum to discuss it on...

If a post or thread disappears it is because a mod or admin feels it or a part of it violated a rule or the purpose of the forum.

Other Mods are in agreement on this. We remind some members who may object to this that TreasureNet is a PRIVATE OWN forum with public access.

If any have a complaint about this you can discuss it via PMs, either among yourselves or a mod via PM.


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

So there are no further misunderstandings....

The 2nd Amendment Forum was NOT open to debate if the 2nd amendment is good, or its relevance in today's world......

The 2nd amendment is already in the Bill of Rights of our Constitution.

This forum was opened to keep members informed of the new gun laws being proposed that attack the 2nd amendment, hence the name 2nd Amendment Watchdog....

The 2nd Amendment is NOT open for debate, or attack on this forum. The right of an American citizen to be armed under the 2nd Amendment is an established right in our Bill of Rights and our Constitution.

If some members wish to debate the relevance of the 2nd or if our right to keep and bear arms should be allowed then they should seek out another forum to discuss it on...

If a post or thread disappears it is because a mod or admin feels it or a part of it violated a rule or the purpose of the forum.

Other Mods are in agreement on this. We remind some members who may object to this that TreasureNet is a PRIVATE OWN forum with public access.

If any have a complaint about this you can discuss it via PMs, either among yourselves or a mod via PM.


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Close ALL "Threads" on this Forum, then...
 

fight_right.gif
fight_onground.gif
fight.gif

baby_gun_100.jpg

 

I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that the second amendment should be abolished? I think most if not all of us support the second amendment. I think the disagreements come about when the thread is allowed to become the anti government / anti Obama thread instead of the second amendment thread. Many of us support our government and do not believe in wild conspiracy theories. I am assuming that it is ok to express these opinions / beliefs.
 

I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that the second amendment should be abolished? I think most if not all of us support the second amendment. I think the disagreements come about when the thread is allowed to become the anti government / anti Obama thread instead of the second amendment thread. Many of us support our government and do not believe in wild conspiracy theories. I am assuming that it is ok to express these opinions / beliefs.
Of course they never say that...They just say "except for this", or "except for that", while they slowly dismantle it. And your guy, Obama, is right in the middle of it. So maybe that's why it turns into an anti-Obama/anti-government discussion. We have an old saying in Idaho. It goes like this "don't p-- down my back, and tell me it's raining"
Jim
 

Of course they never say that...They just say "except for this", or "except for that", while they slowly dismantle it. And your guy, Obama, is right in the middle of it. So maybe that's why it turns into an anti-Obama/anti-government discussion. We have an old saying in Idaho. It goes like this "don't p-- down my back, and tell me it's raining"
Jim

Your guy?? I voted Romney and am a registered republican so not sure what your talking about. I'm just pro USA and pro truth.
 

Of course they never say that...They just say "except for this", or "except for that", while they slowly dismantle it. And your guy, Obama, is right in the middle of it. So maybe that's why it turns into an anti-Obama/anti-government discussion. We have an old saying in Idaho. It goes like this "don't p-- down my back, and tell me it's raining"
Jim

And how are things being "dismantled"? With the expiration of the FAWB aren't there far fewer restrictions now on gun ownership than there has been for decades?
 

Your guy?? I voted Romney and am a registered republican so not sure what your talking about. I'm just pro USA and pro truth.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLLLLLLLLL You are so republican!
 

Dave it is against tnet rules to insinuate that someone is lying.
Did I say that? Are you feeling unstable? Why are you trying so hard to cry lately?
 

Did I say that? Are you feeling unstable? Why are you trying so hard to cry lately?

Dave it is against the rules of this site to make personal attacks against other posters. Your insinuations that I am "feeling unstable" is highly insulting. Is there a reason why you feel the need to make personal attacks?
 

Stocky,, You are super funny tonight!:tongue3::laughing7::occasion14:
 

Yes you should Stocky,
Thank you too.
 

Your guy?? I voted Romney and am a registered republican so not sure what your talking about. I'm just pro USA and pro truth.

Then why do you consistently argue when people post about the war on our 2nd amendment rights? I think actions speak louder than words, if you get my drift. If you don't get my drift see "old Idaho saying" above.
Jim
 

Then why do you consistently argue when people post about the war on our 2nd amendment rights? I think actions speak louder than words, if you get my drift. If you don't get my drift see "old Idaho saying" above.
Jim

It's kinda like the Mafia back in the 1960's. Hoover and some others thought if they denied the existance of it long enough and loud enough people would stop believing it was real.

It appears he's trying to do the same thing with regards to the all out assault (yep, they're doing the assaulting) on our Second Amendment rights. He's not alone either.

Have you noticed that, no matter the venue, when anyone of any party affiliation starts talking about the news stories in any way other than to blow them off, the left finds themselves unable to withhold from trying to discredit the source and tell us that "there's nothing new under the sun". "You can trust the government to do the right thing . . . "

This coonass living amongst the rednecks of Arkansas isn't falling for the lies.
 

Last edited:
Then why do you consistently argue when people post about the war on our 2nd amendment rights? I think actions speak louder than words, if you get my drift. If you don't get my drift see "old Idaho saying" above.
Jim

Sure.

I believe folks need to think for themselves and not just sheepishly follow a political party line.

I believe a lot of the "information" posted on this site comes from less than reputable sources and much of it is blatant lies.

I am very skeptical about big conspiracy theories about FEMA camps, UN takeovers, gov causing 9/11, etc, etc.

I believe in the process of constitutional law as devised by our founding fathers.

I believe everyone has the right to voice their opinion.
 

Sure.

I believe folks need to think for themselves and not just sheepishly follow a political party line.

I believe a lot of the "information" posted on this site comes from less than reputable sources and much of it is blatant lies.

I am very skeptical about big conspiracy theories about FEMA camps, UN takeovers, gov causing 9/11, etc, etc.

I believe in the process of constitutional law as devised by our founding fathers.

I believe everyone has the right to voice their opinion.
If you believe in constitutional law why did you say you see nothing wrong with obama killing Americans citizens on American soil? You saw nothing wrong with the use of drones on American soil to kill American citizens he perceived as terrorists. That violates at least 3 articles of the Bill of Rights.


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top