Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I keep checking back to this post from time to time to see how you are making out. Maybe you should have sent them 35 years ago and then you may have heard something by now!
I hear ya CharlPatience is the only philosophy that works here. They will get back with the results of their analysis in due time. They have the specimen, they are not going to forget at all, they will reply in due time. As I mentioned early in this thread, be patient and the finder will hear from them when they have something to tell Him. So just relax, it's far from the first time they have examined specimens from J.Q. Public, they will let TJE now one way or another. If they are not charging you for the tests, don't be bugging them. I'm sure they understand the finders' anxiousness, but their priorities are their priorities.
Well folks, received a (strange) email reply from the University/Institute....but can't/won't state anything till I have received 'all' the information/paperwork to be sent to me in the mail..(I have requested with the existing paperwork being returned.. to add.."data and test types completed").
Back soon.
I think you have been taken!
There is a long established symbiotic relationship among collectors, hunters, and scientists. Hunters depend on collectors to make a living. Hunters depend on scientists to classify their finds, in order to firmly establish type, rarity, and hence value. Science, apart from the Antartica meteorite collecting expeditions, depends on new finds donated to their labs as part of the requirement for classification. Science obtains new meteorites this way. Collectors buy classified meteorites.
All interconnected and dependent on the other. Without collectors, why hunt for valuable rocks, made valuable by supply and demand in an existing collector market? I'm sure many meteorite scientists would prefer collectors did not exist, but they must admit, we have far more known meteorites because there is a market. So, all my hot air is just to say it would be unusual for a recognized lab to "take" someone. I'm sure it will work the way it usually does, and if not, we have a record right here as well as paper. I do believe the outcome here, regardless if meteorite or meteorwrong, will at least be ethical. BTW, one thing that is different about Canada compared to the US is that it is illegal to export meteorites found in Canada without a government permit.
No evidence of FeNi. Fragments (samples) consist of coarse grained (mm sized crystals of)..Olivine, Pyroxene, and possibly some Acicular Plagioclase Feldspar. Mineral assemblage one would would expect in Gabbro rocktype. [Unquote].
I've did some research on all 'stated info'...
If one reads these attached links/sites 'thoroughly'...'all and every' description...is decribed in these links.
Like to know what people with more expertise than myself think!...Thanks
"No FeNi"...and "Minerals expected"......Fisrt paragraph of this link!
www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/martians-met/meteorites.html
"Grabbro rocktype"....link!
Martian Meteorites
Well folks, nothing at the P.O. box,....but I did get a reply in email from the institute!
No evidence of FeNi. Fragments (samples) consist of coarse grained (mm sized crystals of)..Olivine, Pyroxene, and possibly some Acicular Plagioclase Feldspar. Mineral assemblage one would would expect in Gabbro rocktype. [Unquote].
I've did some research on all 'stated info'...
If one reads these attached links/sites 'thoroughly'...'all and every' description...is decribed in these links.
Like to know what people with more expertise than myself think!...Thanks
"No FeNi"...and "Minerals expected"......Fisrt paragraph of this link!
www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/martians-met/meteorites.html
"Grabbro rocktype"....link!
Martian Meteorites
Did they not tell you yea or nay on whether it was a meteorite? It sounds like it was not a meteorite, unfortunately.
i hope I'm wrong. Did they lead you to believe it was Martian meteorite? First link was broke when I tried it, TJE.