Why skeptics doesnt show proof?

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

Are you changing the topic title in midstream?

OK, here goes: The theory of LRLs is that it is dowsing. That's it.

The electronics stuff has no coherent scientific theory.

So, that covers it.

Want to start another new topic now?







Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

You know what? It's worthless to argue with you and this is one of the reason.

You said "The electronics stuff has no coherent scientific theory". This sentence, apparently means, everything designed to be worked as electronic equipment. I don't going to argue with you, insult you, "F" you or whatever, I just send you to some community college nearby to your neighborhood and ask to some electrical engineer or electronic professor if "The electronics stuff has no coherent scientific theory" , because I won't waste my time with your intelligence level.

Thanks and have a good day

Arch

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

You know full well that it pertains to LRLs.

You're really grasping at straws!

And I doubt that your childish insults are impressing anyone.

But that's all you have left, so I guess you have no choice.










Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

You know full well that it pertains to LRLs.

You're really grasping at straws!

And I doubt that your childish insults are impressing anyone.

But that's all you have left, so I guess you have no choice.










Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

Do what I told you and be happy

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

So you're finally telling us that you're really a politician!

That figures.














Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

So you're finally telling us that you're really a politician!

That figures.














Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

You're hanging too much with SWR

Arch

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

So you're finally telling us that you're really a politician!

That figures.














Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

BTW

The link that you post here "Big four Proofs of LRL fraud" in the bottom, it is not really a proof, it's a link to another topic in this forum that talk about the same subject and Morgan? post a youtube link about Randy's content.

My God, General engineering 101 with you!!

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

You're hanging too much with SWR

More juvenile comment, because you have no logical data to offer in rebuttal.

The link that you post here "Big four Proofs of LRL fraud" in the bottom, it is not really a proof, it's a link to another topic in this forum that talk about the same subject...

My God, General engineering 101 with you!

Wrong, again. It's a link directly to my original post of the Big Four Proofs.
See? Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

The Big Four has yet to be successfully rebutted.

Your comment about engineering has absolutely nothing to do with the list. Just another obvious diversionary tactic.


Why do you continue to post such obviously lame and nonsensical "attacks"? You only lose more and more credibility each time. Oh well, thanks for the help.

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

You're hanging too much with SWR

More juvenile comment, because you have no logical data to offer in rebuttal.

The link that you post here "Big four Proofs of LRL fraud" in the bottom, it is not really a proof, it's a link to another topic in this forum that talk about the same subject...

My God, General engineering 101 with you!

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php?topic=376344.new;topicseen
See? Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

The Big Four has yet to be successfully rebutted.

Your comment about engineering has absolutely nothing to do with the list. Just another obvious diversionary tactic.


Why do you continue to post such obviously lame and nonsensical "attacks"? You only lose more and more credibility each time. Oh well, thanks for the help.

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php?topic=376344.new;topicseen

you're right, it's simple link, that is it, nothing more, so, don't call it "Proof"

Your comment about engineering has absolutely nothing to do

Totally wrong. Talking about LRL - air mode or a MFD, definitely, we have to talk about "electrical engineering" in it's more simple theory for its comprehension and use in the field. When you say "The electronics stuff has no coherent scientific theory" quickly I will think you don't know anything about this subject or discipline. Remember, the sentence "Electronic stuff" or "stuff" are words that they can be use them for many interpretation, so, if you're not specific in your main idea, you going mess around.(eng. 101)

You only lose more and more credibility each time

Hey, this is part of this game in this forum called "Long Range Locator" and you're the next one because nobody push you to participate, so

WELCOME TO THE CLUB

Arch

 

[Carl-NC]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Hi Arch,

Since you originally directed this thread at me, it'd be rude for me not to reply. So exactly what are you asking for proof of? That is, a video of what?

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

You just pasted a fake link into your "quote" of my post, then quoted that.

This is my link: Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud



Why in the World did you post a fake link? It's totally obvious!

All anyone has to do is scroll their cursor over each link, then look in the lower left corner of their browser (unless they have the setting for "Easy Site Names," or similar, set in their browser properties), and the actual URL of that link can be seen. (Duh.) I think you've gone too far, this time. The old saying about giving someone enough rope, seems to have proven itself true, for that little trick.

 

[woof!]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Hi Arch,

Since you originally directed this thread at me, it'd be rude for me not to reply. So exactly what are you asking for proof of? That is, a video of what?

I ain't Archie, Carl, but here's my suggestion: a video of Klondike doing a "dealer trick" and botching it thereby revealing the secret of success. That's not the "proof" that Archie wants (he doesn't want proof, what good is proof to him?) but it would be an entertaining step in the right direction.

If Archie has a better suggestion, let 'er rip.

--Toto

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

There are a couple of LRL proponents on here that have gotten so silly with their posts lately, that I think it's their way of trying to laugh-off the fact that they have totally and miserably lost their argument.

It must be the, "If you can't beat 'em, then just act like you're crazy, and maybe they'll go away and leave you alone" strategy. Kind of like the opossum thing. Then later they can go back to talking their techno-babble, trying to convince people that LRLs are worth lots of money.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would put forth such a continuous effort unless they were somehow profiting from it. It just doesn't make any sense otherwise.

So far, two of them have sent me PMs, offering a manufacturer's Website, and trying to convince me to buy one.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Real simple to answer..
Because they just wish they had some proof…Art
"The door to Knowledge & Understanding, is never open to a closed, or prejudiced mind”

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

There are a couple of LRL proponents on here that have gotten so silly with their posts lately, that I think it's their way of trying to laugh-off the fact that they have totally and miserably lost their argument.

It must be the, "If you can't beat 'em, then just act like you're crazy, and maybe they'll go away and leave you alone" strategy. Kind of like the opossum thing. Then later they can go back to talking their techno-babble, trying to convince people that LRLs are worth lots of money.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would put forth such a continuous effort unless they were somehow profiting from it. It just doesn't make any sense otherwise.

So far, two of them have sent me PMs, offering a manufacturer's Website, and trying to convince me to buy one.

EE

IF YOU DON'T LIKE HOW THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN CONDUCTED, YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO. IF YOU WANT TO BE RESPECTED YOU HAVE TO BE THE FIRST ONE TO DO IT.

THIS FORUM IS FOR PEOPLE THAT PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD AND I'M ONE OF THEM BECAUSE I'D SEEN HOW THOSE MACHINES FIND METALS,AND YOU AND NOBODY HERE CAN'T REFUSE MY EXPERIENCE.

IF YOU WANT BE AN OPPONENT, COOL! BUT I REMIND YOU THAT YOU HAVE YOUR LIMITS BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE HAD BEEN BANNED DUE THEY'D MADE INSULT AGAINST LRL'S USER. SO BE CAREFUL!

BTW I MADE MY FIRST COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU TO THE MODERATOR.




CARL

I'M SORRY IF I USED YOUR NAME AS REFERENCE BUT I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST TO YOU. I THINK YOU'RE A SMART GUY BUT SINCE YOU HAVE A WEB SITE ABOUT MFD AND LRL,YOU HAVE TO EXPECT, IN SOME WAY, SOME RESPOND FROM SOMEBODY.

ARCH

 

[Rudy(CA)]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

THIS FORUM IS FOR PEOPLE THAT PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD AND I'M ONE OF THEM BECAUSE I'D SEEN HOW THOSE MACHINES FIND METALS,AND YOU AND NOBODY HERE CAN'T REFUSE MY EXPERIENCE.

Arch, I think you misunderstood the membership rules of this forum. It is not for the exclusive use of people that "PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD". Indeed, in creating this forum Marc Austin wrote:

As the administrator, creator and owner of this site, I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE GET RIPPED OFF (defrauded) by people selling so-called "long range locators" (devices, that supposedly, can find precious metals at a distance). I HIGHLY recommend consulting a geophysicist ($100 in consulting fees could save you thousands, and you'll learn something!), before spending ONE DIME ON ANY "long range locator" . With that, I open this forum to the discussion of said devices.

"...discussion of said devices." Both pro and cons is the operative clause.

With that out of the way, I am curious about one thing you said. You said you have "seen" an LRL or MFD in operation. Have you had any first hand success with them?

 

[hung]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

There are a couple of LRL proponents on here that have gotten so silly with their posts lately, that I think it's their way of trying to laugh-off the fact that they have totally and miserably lost their argument.

It must be the, "If you can't beat 'em, then just act like you're crazy, and maybe they'll go away and leave you alone" strategy. Kind of like the opossum thing. Then later they can go back to talking their techno-babble, trying to convince people that LRLs are worth lots of money.

I find it hard to believe that anyone would put forth such a continuous effort unless they were somehow profiting from it. It just doesn't make any sense otherwise.

So far, two of them have sent me PMs, offering a manufacturer's Website, and trying to convince me to buy one.

EE

IF YOU DON'T LIKE HOW THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN CONDUCTED, YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO. IF YOU WANT TO BE RESPECTED YOU HAVE TO BE THE FIRST ONE TO DO IT.

THIS FORUM IS FOR PEOPLE THAT PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD AND I'M ONE OF THEM BECAUSE I'D SEEN HOW THOSE MACHINES FIND METALS,AND YOU AND NOBODY HERE CAN'T REFUSE MY EXPERIENCE.

IF YOU WANT BE AN OPPONENT, COOL! BUT I REMIND YOU THAT YOU HAVE YOUR LIMITS BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE HAD BEEN BANNED DUE THEY'D MADE INSULT AGAINST LRL'S USER. SO BE CAREFUL!

BTW I MADE MY FIRST COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU TO THE MODERATOR.




CARL

I'M SORRY IF I USED YOUR NAME AS REFERENCE BUT I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST TO YOU. I THINK YOU'RE A SMART GUY BUT SINCE YOU HAVE A WEB SITE ABOUT MFD AND LRL,YOU HAVE TO EXPECT, IN SOME WAY, SOME RESPOND FROM SOMEBODY.

ARCH

Arch, this unfortunate person did the same thing in the cameras thread.
Don't bother, he is not worth the time and effort. Ignore him.

Dr. Rudy: Nor only Arch, but several of us here have succeded with MFD type LRLs. My first experience with one was about 5 years ago. It indicated a target inside a cave. Then the Mineoros beeped confirming it. There was part of a jesuit treasure.
Maybe the day you take the paper bag off you will be able to spot where the rods are pointing.

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

THIS FORUM IS FOR PEOPLE THAT PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD AND I'M ONE OF THEM BECAUSE I'D SEEN HOW THOSE MACHINES FIND METALS,AND YOU AND NOBODY HERE CAN'T REFUSE MY EXPERIENCE.

Arch, I think you misunderstood the membership rules of this forum. It is not for the exclusive use of people that "PRACTICE AND BELIEVE IN LRL AND MFD". Indeed, in creating this forum Marc Austin wrote:

As the administrator, creator and owner of this site, I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE GET RIPPED OFF (defrauded) by people selling so-called "long range locators" (devices, that supposedly, can find precious metals at a distance). I HIGHLY recommend consulting a geophysicist ($100 in consulting fees could save you thousands, and you'll learn something!), before spending ONE DIME ON ANY "long range locator" . With that, I open this forum to the discussion of said devices.

"...discussion of said devices." Both pro and cons is the operative clause.

With that out of the way, I am curious about one thing you said. You said you have "seen" an LRL or MFD in operation. Have you had any first hand success with them?

Hi Rudy

Do you read English very well?

Mark is warning people with his statement. He talking directly to people that pretend to sell LRL in this forum. so re-write your post please.

Mark finish his statement: I open this forum to the discussion of said devices.

If you look the topic of this forum say "LONG RANGE LOCATORS" ,...hellow

arch

 

[Carl-NC]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

I'M SORRY IF I USED YOUR NAME AS REFERENCE BUT I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST TO YOU. I THINK YOU'RE A SMART GUY BUT SINCE YOU HAVE A WEB SITE ABOUT MFD AND LRL,YOU HAVE TO EXPECT, IN SOME WAY, SOME RESPOND FROM SOMEBODY.

If my reports were false in any way, who would be the most likely to respond? And why don't they?

You still didn't say what you are looking for. Ferinstance, if I make a video of me opening up a LectraSearch and showing the scrap circuit board inside, would you then believe the LectraSearch has a scrap circuit board inside?

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch---

When someone posts nonsensical gibberish, and makes no attempt to relate his comments, in any logical way, to what was said in the post which he is replying to, I think it's fair to state the obvious.

Your remarks about what my opinion of LRLs are, is totally wrong, and it's obvious that you must know that. So what does that make you?

1. I have never contested that some people are finding what they are looking for with LRLs.

2. I have not even said that dowsing doesn't work for some people.


Here is a summation of what I have said, many times. I think the average person reading it fully understands exactly what it says, and what it doesn't say. Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud.

Since my opinions are not against the users of LRLs, I can only assume that your anger is because you are not merely a user, but associated with some manufacturer(s). You seem to be going to extreme measures to shut me up. Did my message strike a nerve, or your wallet?

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

By the way, Arch, you actually posted a fake quote, and attributed it to me.

That's about as low as it gets.

And your claiming that my ethics aren't up to par?