Why skeptics doesnt show proof?

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Guys, there is no proof they don't work where I am at, or where Art is at.
I just came in from the yard and have 2 quarters, 2 penny's, 2 dimes, a dolphin pin, and a piece of melted metal. I chased a signal out in the field and got the chunk of metal, on the way back I swung the Garrett and found the coins and pin.

So, did the LRL just find the chunk of metal or was it responsible for me finding the other stuff where I would have never looked???

OR, did I guess where the metal was in the field??? The LRL did miss it by 3 inches. From 250 ft.

The signal is still there so I "guess" I'll go back with the Minelab.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenix---

fenixdigger said:
Guys, there is no proof they don't work where I am at, or where Art is at.
I just came in from the yard and have 2 quarters, 2 penny's, 2 dimes, a dolphin pin, and a piece of melted metal. I chased a signal out in the field....

On another forum some guy is saying that he has martians living in his backyard.

Do you believe that?

:dontknow:
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Since I just washed them off and am looking at them, if one of them was a martian, it would still be wet and I would have no choice but to believe that I had in fact just washed a "Martian"
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

~SWR~
I call shenanigans and request validation to the above claim. If you cannot support you're claim....simply say you can't, and move on. We all understand how important it is to fabricate accomplishments to advance your opinion or agenda.
Correct..The question is will you ever support anything that you post ?
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Oh gee, called out. What will I do????
 

Attachments

  • P3110049.JPG
    P3110049.JPG
    79.8 KB · Views: 129
Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

And a wider view with the garrett and mfd

And a few of the rods.








I call "Goober"
 

Attachments

  • P3110048.JPG
    P3110048.JPG
    76 KB · Views: 135
  • P3090047.JPG
    P3090047.JPG
    74.2 KB · Views: 137
Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

And before it starts, I did not find the 1/2 lb silver coin. I use it for my witness. I made the mfd and all the rods but 1.

You got me, I did buy the Garrett, but I did find the case in the woods. Does that count???
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

No little SWR, the truth will keep coming. A little special is on tv right now. The history channel
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenixdigger said:
No little SWR, the truth will keep coming. A little special is on tv right now. The history channel

Loads of BS and you call it proof...
HAHAHA..


aarthrj3811 said:
I'll repeat.... AGAIN
What would be construed as sufficient proof that these devices are a fraud to you, besides the convictions like I said?
Well lets see…If I went out in the field and received a signal.. If I checked the depth of the signal and the distance to it. After doing the weight check and the target identification I followed the signal..After digging the gold it would make me wonder if any of the readings were wrong..I believe in the performance of the device and not what some self proclaimed expert tell me…Art

No, you believe the more people you can deceive the more money you're making out of wallet mining.
You believe everyone on here's some rock born ape that doesn't know any better.
And you also believe, not in the devices performance, (or any experts for that matter you've had plenty of links fed to you regarding that) your kooky shenanigans so much that of course you're on here spreading your baloney... you actually really do believe it, its called being delusional.

Art is a master at this... no one can be fooled by his awesome powers of shenanigans and topic derailing.

All of your claims of finding anything are completely worthless, because as anyone entering these forums for the first time and not following all the drivel could tell you (like I am now) there's no freaking way any of those devices can do anything you claim they do. I don't want to see what you found out of dumb luck after a whole day of digging around random places in a ghost town, because I know I sure as heck can find more (with a little luck) than that when I do that without a detector even. I can also come on here and show you what I found two weeks ago with my infinium and claim I found it with an LRL or MFD that I have somewhere in a couple dozen pieces in my garage, that doesn't prove a freakin thing. Believing any of you and your claims right now would be like believing any of these CONVICTED con-men that have been found guilty of fraud selling these devices. That will never happen.

I'm STILL waiting for WHAT you will take as solid evidence that these devices are a complete fraud but the more I think about it the more I realize Art and a few others on here are so whole heartedly into this that they are nothing less than complicit in this fraud. They will give nothing when its their place to give and take everything when its not their place to take.
The only people who ever do these dirty little conversational maneuvers are criminals who know they have no place to go.

Go ahead give this whole thread the run around yet again Art, you've done it like at least a dozen times in the last page already, why not?
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Now the guy on the other forum says that the martians in his back yard have positively verified that LRLs are no more than dowsing.

So, I guess that settles it!

Testimonials are acceptable proof, according to the LRL folks.

:hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2: :hello2:
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Just to be straight with this, posting photos of what was discussed doesn't count as proof?
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

I see your point. Sorry I was not able to get Jesus to pose in the photo, but it was the best I could do. You and the rest of the rat pack are soooo right, what was I thinking???

OMG, The only word that comes to mind is the same one as before -----PITIFUL
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

You are so smart and clever, how could we have ever doubted you???? Do you concur???
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

fenixdigger said:
Just to be straight with this, posting photos of what was discussed doesn't count as proof?

No you and your group of kooks have repeatedly proven you cannot be trusted or believed in any regards to anything you claim or post.
Your continuing approach to not answering legitimate questions and completely trying to derail every argument that's not going in your favor shows you cannot be trusted in any regard.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

good afternoon WH: you posted -->there's no freaking way any of those devices can do anything you claim they do
****************
You, of course can back this statement with mathematical and nano / bio-electrical proof?

Don Jose de La Mancha GH (Gold Hat)
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
good afternoon WH: you posted -->there's no freaking way any of those devices can do anything you claim they do
****************
You, of course can back this statement with mathematical and nano / bio-electrical proof?

Don Jose de La Mancha GH (Gold Hat)

Besides personally being able to; why would I need to? Look at all the past posts with links.
Because you full well know that the truth is, if i DID post every little technical and scientific argument on here in very technical terms
you yourself would personally get on every little aspect and try to derail the argument, yet again, with pointless jargon that does not help you in any way.

It would be like feeding ammo into a gun I intend to play russian roulette with.
In the meantime, make do with whats on here its about 5X more than enough to prove your fake gizmos all wrong.




Do your posts get more pointless from here on out or are they all going to stay on the same level? Because frankly you're worse than Art.
Your questions aren't piqued; they're just a nuisance trying to, basically, quiz me on my previous posts right about now.
Just give up the charade everyone can see past it. So far I've noticed you and someone else on here are basically just instigators where you have no business trying to instigate anything, nor from the looks of it do you have the knowledge to even try.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/self-importance
self-importance - an exaggerated opinion of your own importance
egotism, swelled head
conceitedness, vanity, conceit - the trait of being unduly vain and conceited; false pride
superiority complex - an exaggerated estimate of your own value and importance
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

aarthrj3811 said:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/self-importance
self-importance - an exaggerated opinion of your own importance
egotism, swelled head
conceitedness, vanity, conceit - the trait of being unduly vain and conceited; false pride
superiority complex - an exaggerated estimate of your own value and importance

Thanks for defining yourself in plain words, but thats not what this threads about.
 

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

HI guywh: You posted -->Besides personally being able to; why would I need to?
************
The answer is so obvious that it is embarrassing, for your EGO, since nothing else has been forthcoming.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
you also posted --> nor from the looks of it do you have the knowledge to even try.
*************
Speaking of try, try me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You also posted -->In the meantime, make do with whats on here its about 5X more than enough to prove your fake gizmos all wrong.
************
May I ask what "gizmo's" do I have ?

Don Jose de La Mancha GH
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top