Who else is getting tired of hearing about the Templars

I, for one, was absolutely amazed when they found coconut fibers on a continent that, well, has coconuts. "Amazing discovery!" I think that's when I quit watching that TV drama. :laughing7:
 

Wow! We sure have some erudite people on this thread. I find these posts and arguments far more entertaining than the Oak Island show itself.
 

The only verified evidence is coconut fiber found on Smith's Cove. Which coincidently carbon dated back to the time of the Templars 1260AD to 1400AD. There is stone carvings that have visual similarities to Templar symbols. Even the Mikmaq Indians have legends that speak of Deities that have facial hair and Blue eyes.

Facial hair and blue eyes = Vikings

There is factual, proven evidence that the Vikings came to North America but ZERO evidence the templars did....

And by the way, coconut fiber has no specific ties to the templars......it could have came from anywhere, brought by anyone.....
 

Last edited:
Facial hair and blue eyes = Vikings

There is factual, proven evidence that the Vikings came to North America but ZERO evidence the templars did....

And by the way, coconut fiber has no specific ties to the templars......it could have came from anywhere, brought by anyone.....

Yes, it absolutely does Mr. Wonder, evidently you haven't been paying attention! And I really have to thank you guys for helping me to keep this subject up!

Cheers, Loki
 

I, for one, was absolutely amazed when they found coconut fibers on a continent that, well, has coconuts. "Amazing discovery!" I think that's when I quit watching that TV drama. :laughing7:

Umm, that continent, at least on that side did not have coconuts, so yes, it was an amazing discovery!

Cheers, Loki
 

Yes, it absolutely does Mr. Wonder, evidently you haven't been paying attention! And I really have to thank you guys for helping me to keep this subject up!

Cheers, Loki

Please provide proven factual evidence that the templars brought coconut fibers to hoax island vs. the 1000’s of others who visited the island. Without factual evidence, stating the coconut fibers was brought by the templars is the same as saying the fake roman sword and planted cross are real.

“Keep the subject up”? I believe you mean the fictional story you wish others to buy into...
 

Please provide proven factual evidence that the templars brought coconut fibers to hoax island vs. the 1000’s of others who visited the island. Without factual evidence, stating the coconut fibers was brought by the templars is the same as saying the fake roman sword and planted cross are real.

“Keep the subject up”? I believe you mean the fictional story you wish others to buy into...

My part of the story is not fictional. You know my premise, the Templars are the only ones in the right place at the right time, simple as that. If coconuts grew in the Atlantic Basin before 1500 you would have a valid argument but seeing as how they didn't, you don't. If you are saying I am wrong name a group who was more Likely to have brought the fibres to Nova Scotia in the dated time period. Name some of the thousand's of others who visited the Island before 1500 and brought coconut fibres.

Its like you think the Order didn't ever exist, but you know it did exist!

Cheers, Loki
 

Last edited:
My part of the story is not fictional. You know my premise, the Templars are the only ones in the right place at the right time, simple as that. If coconuts grew in the Atlantic Basin before 1500 you would have a valid argument but seeing as how they didn't, you don't. If you are saying I am wrong name a group who was more Likely to have brought the fibres to Nova Scotia in the dated time period. Name some of the thousand's of others who visited the Island before 1500 and brought coconut fibres.

Its like you think the Order didn't ever exist, but you know it did exist!

Cheers, Loki

The coconuts could have came from anyone of 1000’s of tropical islands and brought by anyone of 1000’s of different folks who visited the island from all over the world...

Again, no factual evidence just fictional story’s.......

On another note....are your referring to the order of the jedi’s? It would go right along with the templar storyline with hoax island...
 

Last edited:
There is even a bigger problem then the FACT that no evidence exists that Knight Templars ever visited Oak Island, Canada or the Americas in general is WHY would they have buried treasure on Oak Island. The argument that they were fleeing persecution and wanted to get their treasure away from the greedy kings thieving hands to then bury and abandon their treasure on some insignificant piece of island in Canada never to return is pretty poor logic. They may of well just have given it to the king... If they were not going to come back and get their treasure and were only trying to keep it from the king. Why not just dump it in the ocean?

Also what happened to the "hoards" of Templars once they had dug their massive engineering feat of OI money pit. Where did they go? Did they sail back to Europe?

The whole Templar argument does not even have a logical premise to base itself on... Like many others have said the Templar angle on OI is not only not supported by evidence it defies logic is my view...

Anyway didn't Nic' Cage find the Templars treasure.. I am sure it was on the "documentary" called National Treasure.....
 

Last edited:

The Grand Master approves of this.

Trump-knight.jpg
 

So that is what his TAX RETURNS show... His wealth come from finding the Knights Templars treasure on Oak Island..... Lets see him call this FAKE NEWS...:laughing7:

You guys solved the mystery!!!!!
 

My part of the story is not fictional. You know my premise, the Templars are the only ones in the right place at the right time, simple as that.

We've been over this a number of times now. That is not correct. I can make a stronger case for the Polynesians having done it, never mind the Norse.

If coconuts grew in the Atlantic Basin before 1500 you would have a valid argument but seeing as how they didn't, you don't.

Do we know for absolutely certain that they didn't? Because we're pretty sure that they grew fairly close to there, and not the sort that came with the Spanish, which is a pretty fascinating thing right there.
 

We've been over this a number of times now. That is not correct. I can make a stronger case for the Polynesians having done it, never mind the Norse.



Do we know for absolutely certain that they didn't? Because we're pretty sure that they grew fairly close to there, and not the sort that came with the Spanish, which is a pretty fascinating thing right there.

The Polynesians are probably the least likely of any of your possible choices. There is no evidence of any pre-columbian South Seas group arriving into the Atlantic Basin. The closest you can get is Easter Island and that is not proven.
We do know that there is proof some Europeans arrived in North America by 1000ad, I am merely premising another group of Europeans arriving several centuries later.

Its difficult for me to believe you can premise Polynesians with their flimsy craft traversing two oceans and cannot accept the possibility of a wealthy Catholic Order with very capable vessels crossing the North Atlantic following routes traversed by other Europeans three centuries earlier with less navigation capibility, and were still making the trip btw.
The Norse method of latitude following was by looking at the sun over their shoulders

Yes, on your second question, look at Mr. Wonders map post on #155.

Cheers, Loki
 

Last edited:
The Polynesians are probably the least likely of any of your possible choices. There is no evidence of any pre-columbian South Seas group arriving into the Atlantic Basin.

There is as much evidence for Polynesians in the New World as there is for Templars in the New World.
 

The Polynesians are probably the least likely of any of your possible choices.


Possible choices for what?

Alex, I'll take "Who Never Ever Visited Oak Island" for $400.

Why fight over who might have been in the area 600 years ago? The Mi'kmaq People certainly, maybe some Scandinavians and some Portuguese fishermen placed at semi-permanent sites within a few hundred miles is pretty supportable.

What this has to do with anything left on or under Oak Island is just wild speculation to make any connection. Just because some group "could" have reached the area is non-evidence they actually did.

Six-pack rings and plastic shopping bags are washing up on the beaches in the Antarctic. That does not mean that Kwikie Mart opened a convenience store on the Ross Ice Shelf.
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top