bigscoop
Gold Member
- Jun 4, 2010
- 13,535
- 9,072
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Ok, all of this recent flurry of certain claims of solve has actually proven a good thing for everyone and the Beale forums, in part because they fully support the fact that the Beale papers can be anything anyone desires, and in part because it has become obvious just how easily these certain claims of solve can be manufactured from complete unknowns given enough time and effort. So now everyone fully realizes this as has been made perfectly clear through endless debate in regards to all of these certain solve examples.
So what was learned? What is learned from all of this is that without any provenance to guide us then literally anything becomes possible. This is why provenance is so-so important, as it not only separates speculation from fact but it also establishes what is real and what isn't real or may not be real, or what may or may not be true. Without prior provenance that something truly exist then all that can be pursued is the desire to discover something meaningful yet even that seemingly meaningful discovery requires provenance.
Some good and interesting theories out there but that is all they are or all they will ever be without the required provenance to turn them into fact, or to turn them into supported theories instead of just unsupported theories, if nothing else.
I personally have my own theory, a very strong theory as to who wrote the Beale papers and why, BUT, unlike the rest of these various claimants I also understand that without that direct connection, that required provenance, I have absolutely nothing other then a theory and I would be nuts to claim otherwise, my integrity completely shot should I persist in trying to sell my theory as fact without said provenance. A lesson hard learned a long time ago, the same lesson others are now learning the same hard way, and no doubt others will continue to learn the same in the future. However, nothing really lost when something truly valuable, perhaps even more valuable, is learned.
So what was learned? What is learned from all of this is that without any provenance to guide us then literally anything becomes possible. This is why provenance is so-so important, as it not only separates speculation from fact but it also establishes what is real and what isn't real or may not be real, or what may or may not be true. Without prior provenance that something truly exist then all that can be pursued is the desire to discover something meaningful yet even that seemingly meaningful discovery requires provenance.
Some good and interesting theories out there but that is all they are or all they will ever be without the required provenance to turn them into fact, or to turn them into supported theories instead of just unsupported theories, if nothing else.
I personally have my own theory, a very strong theory as to who wrote the Beale papers and why, BUT, unlike the rest of these various claimants I also understand that without that direct connection, that required provenance, I have absolutely nothing other then a theory and I would be nuts to claim otherwise, my integrity completely shot should I persist in trying to sell my theory as fact without said provenance. A lesson hard learned a long time ago, the same lesson others are now learning the same hard way, and no doubt others will continue to learn the same in the future. However, nothing really lost when something truly valuable, perhaps even more valuable, is learned.