What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE : coffee2:, You poded --> The silence from the other side is eerie.
***************
Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times??

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

News Flash!

We have a new Update!

The new complete list now looks like this---



What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

They fear taking Carl's double-blind test.

They fear the Big Four Proofs of LRL Fraud and the Predictable Pattern of LRL Con Artists.

They fear suggesting or agreeing upon a protocol for a fair and unbiased random double-blind test.

They fear committing to a statement of what their LRLs are: dowsers, dowsing enhancers, or all electronically operated devices.

They fear stating the average percentage of success, under optimal conditions, that LRLs have.

They fear being asked why there are no stories and pictures of treasures being found with LRLs, like there are for metal detectors, both in newspapers and here on the forum; and why the LRL makers are the only people who claim to have found anything with them.

They fear the "Do the Math!" thread.

They fear their LRL devices being analysed by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear the schematics of LRL devices being evaluated by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear anyone challenging their claims.

They fear Science.

They fear truth.



And they fear this---



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Tropical Tramp

Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times??

Yes they have…He likes to make demands of people. If you do not give him the answers he thinks he deserves it will go on one of his lists..Art

 

[EE THr]

Tropical Tramp

Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times??

Yes they have…He likes to make demands of people. If you do not give him the answers he thinks he deserves it will go on one of his lists..Art

Yes. They have been covered successfully by the LRL challengers, and never answered by the LRL promoters. That's why I put them on the that list.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Yes. They have been covered successfully by the LRL challengers, and never answered by the LRL promoters. That's why I put them on the that list.

~Tropical Tramp~

Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times??

He has only thinks that he has been successfully..He answers what he thinks are challenges by putting every thing on a list. ..Art

"Folks just do not understand that something has be be proven to work...first...before you can prove that it doesn't"
~SWR

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Yes. They have been covered successfully by the LRL challengers, and never answered by the LRL promoters. That's why I put them on the that list.

~Tropical Tramp~

Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times??

He has only thinks that he has been successfully..He answers what he thinks are challenges by putting every thing on a list. ..Art

"Folks just do not understand that something has be be proven to work...first...before you can prove that it doesn't"
~SWR

con-artie;

I have no challenges to answer.

You are the one who has made the claims, and have been challenged to prove them.

#14, as usual.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE: it was posted in answer to your question -->*************** good post.

Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times?? Obviously you also have a problem in comprehending the nuances in the Englsh language. That meant that they were all successfully countered. snicker.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HI EE: it was posted in answer to your question -->***************
Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times?? Obviously you also have a problem in comprehending the nuances in the Englsh language. That meant that they were all successfully countered. snicker.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I know what you meant, but the facts are that none of them have.

That's why they made the list in the first place!

When I found that they either continually changed the subject (usually with nonsense insults), or just outright said that they won't answer, after a few times of asking, I put those questions on the list.

They have never answered, and they never will....because they can't. The reason they can't is because it would then be obvious to prove they are lying. That's because once they commit to a definition, it can then be shown to be contradicting something else they have already said.

For instance, they won't actually commit to saying whether their LRL is a dowser, dowsing enhancer, or an all-electronically operated device. To wit: If they say it's a dowser, then the LRL is, like I have said, just dowsing; and if they say it's a dowsing enhancer, then that's false advertising; finally, if they say it's all-electronically operated, then it's a lie, because you can't clamp it in a vise and have it point to a moving target (even if you clamp it so you can still hold the handle, to provide "bio-energy"). So, if they define what it is, they lose, and they know it.

(But failing to define it, they have lost already, but just don't know it.)

Would you care to answer that question?

I'm all ears....

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Tropical Tramp~

HI EE: it was posted in answer to your question -->***************
Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times?? Obviously you also have a problem in comprehending the nuances in the Englsh language. That meant that they were all successfully countered. snicker.

I don’t know if he has poor Reading Comprehension or some kind of Mental block when it comes to LRL… We have answered his questions but he pretends that we have not. He claims that he does not have to prove anything to us because you can not prove a negative…In my view I see that LRL’s are real treasure hunting devices so I consider them as a positive. When someone tells us that they are fraudulent or just Dowsing that is considered to be a negative .
He claims he is not a skeptic. He claims he is the challenger…The only thing here that is being Challenged is his “Believe System..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Art, you and I have been trying to give ways for people to see the difference in these things, but that would remove the useless argue factor they seem to worship.

Perhaps unknown viewers are making use of the info besides the ones I am in contact with.

 

[Saturna]

Art, you and I have been trying to give ways for people to see the difference in these things, but that would remove the useless argue factor they seem to worship.

An amusing comment considering how you guys are never over on that new forum that censors non-believers, despite your initial comments on how great that was.

Instead, you are over here. (and it's not because some readers here are getting 'great' knowledge from your posts)

 

[EE THr]

~Tropical Tramp~

HI EE: it was posted in answer to your question -->***************
Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times?? Obviously you also have a problem in comprehending the nuances in the Englsh language. That meant that they were all successfully countered. snicker.

I don’t know if he has poor Reading Comprehension or some kind of Mental block when it comes to LRL… We have answered his questions but he pretends that we have not. He claims that he does not have to prove anything to us because you can not prove a negative…In my view I see that LRL’s are real treasure hunting devices so I consider them as a positive. When someone tells us that they are fraudulent or just Dowsing that is considered to be a negative .
He claims he is not a skeptic. He claims he is the challenger…The only thing here that is being Challenged is his “Believe System..Art

First, you refuse to answer those questions, then you avoid them with nonsensical answers and insults.

Now, you just claim that you have answered them. Are you counting your silly replies and insults?



If you've answered them, quote a post for each one you've rationally answered or addressed.

If you have rationally responded to any, I'll remove those from the list.

Fair enouth?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

First, you refuse to answer those questions, then you avoid them with nonsensical answers and insults.

It is not my problem that you can not understand my answers and view them as nonsensical and insults…Just maybe if you had any knowledge about Treasure Hunting and using this type of equipment it would help you.

Now, you just claim that you have answered them. Are you counting your silly replies and insults?

I see no need to count anything that I have posted.

If you've answered them, quote a post for each one you've rationally answered or addressed.

Gee..why would I want to do that?..

If you have rationally responded to any, I'll remove those from the list.

It seems that answers are not what you are lacking…

 

[EE THr]

First, you refuse to answer those questions, then you avoid them with nonsensical answers and insults.

It is not my problem that you can not understand my answers and view them as nonsensical and insults…Just maybe if you had any knowledge about Treasure Hunting and using this type of equipment it would help you.

Now, you just claim that you have answered them. Are you counting your silly replies and insults?

I see no need to count anything that I have posted.

If you've answered them, quote a post for each one you've rationally answered or addressed.

Gee..why would I want to do that?..

If you have rationally responded to any, I'll remove those from the list.

It seems that answers are not what you are lacking…

No, con-artie, it's because you have not answered. Because you cannot answer without proving yourself a liar.

But don't worry, because you already have done that. And thanks.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI sattie mi friend: you posted -->you guys are never over on that new forum that censors non-believers
***************
Didn't know that one existed, however, I prefer one where the non believers are 'not' censored, such as this one. Of course I would be interested in one that is actively exploring potential developments of lrl's by new techniques and theories. Wouldn't you?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HI sattie mi friend: you posted -->you guys are never over on that new forum that censors non-believers
***************
Didn't know that one existed, however, I prefer one where the non believers are 'not' censored, such as this one. Of course I would be interested in one that is actively exploring potential developments of lrl's by new techniques and theories. Wouldn't you?

Don Jose de La Mancha

You should start a thread called "Let's Build an LRL That Acutally Works (And Can Pass a Double-Blind Test)," and see what happens.

I wonder who would post suggestions?

I mean, it is possible, isn't it? (I'm not referring to the LRLs currently on the market.)

 

[aarthrj3811]

Fear the Most
fear the most? Which of the following do you fear the most?


Career problems
Career problems

Death
Death

Death of a friend/spouse/family member
Death of a friend/spouse/family member

Failure
Failure

Illness
Illness

Inadequate finances
Inadequate finances

Insects
Insects

Loneliness
Loneliness

Lost love (divorce, break-up)
Lost love (divorce, break-up)

Natural disaster
Natural disaster

Public speaking
Public speaking

Random violence
Random violence

Unhappiness
Unhappiness

War or political upheaval
War or political upheaval

Other
Other

Darn…I don’t see LRL’s on the list..Art

 

[EE THr]

Which of the following do you fear the most?....

Another off-topic, nonsense post, con-artie; in an effort to avoid confronting the issues of this topic.

Please stick to the topic issues, as shown in the post above the nonsense.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Sigh, somehow this series has gone off line? It was posted "what do LRL Promoters fear the most"?

shucks that is so easy that it is embarrassing, THEIR WIVES" !

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Rudy(CA)]

Sigh, somehow this series has gone off line? It was posted "what do LRL Promoters fear the most"?

shucks that is so easy that it is embarrassing, THEIR WIVES" !

Don Jose de La Mancha

Hmm, does the above apply to Judy also? Interesting .... Just saying.

Makes me wonder what else is hanging on her rear view mirror.