Undeniable proof that gun control works

[ShadowLine]

We go full circle with TH providing even more irrefutable proof that gun control has worked in NYC with Harlem now safer than London. Good find TH I didn't see this one. Excellent datapoint.

On the contrary, you have YET to show actual proof and you continue to duck questions without exception. You have been asked to answer questions and you have tried to duck them by trying to derail your own thread. You refuse to acknowledge valid points because they are inconvenient to your personal agenda. I'm sorry Picker, I originally pegged you for someone searching to have an open dialogue about controversial topics. Sadly you have shown you wish nothing else but to push your agenda, regardless of the presence (or in your case absence) of facts.

Please, address the points that were raised so we can have a true debate. In the absence of that action it simply appears like you want to pontificate. And on internet boards, that doesn't go over very well.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[Crispin]

On the contrary, you have YET to show actual proof and you continue to duck questions without exception. You have been asked to answer questions and you have tried to duck them by trying to derail your own thread. You refuse to acknowledge valid points because they are inconvenient to your personal agenda. I'm sorry Picker, I originally pegged you for someone searching to have an open dialogue about controversial topics. Sadly you have shown you wish nothing else but to push your agenda, regardless of the presence (or in your case absence) of facts.

Please, address the points that were raised so we can have a true debate. In the absence of that action it simply appears like you want to pontificate. And on internet boards, that doesn't go over very well.

What do you think Stocky's agenda is? I have not been able to figure it out.

 

[0121stockpicker]

On the contrary, you have YET to show actual proof and you continue to duck questions without exception. You have been asked to answer questions and you have tried to duck them by trying to derail your own thread. You refuse to acknowledge valid points because they are inconvenient to your personal agenda. I'm sorry Picker, I originally pegged you for someone searching to have an open dialogue about controversial topics. Sadly you have shown you wish nothing else but to push your agenda, regardless of the presence (or in your case absence) of facts.

Please, address the points that were raised so we can have a true debate. In the absence of that action it simply appears like you want to pontificate. And on internet boards, that doesn't go over very well.

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about - what points are you talking about? And in a discussion what do you think it means when someone starts getting personal ?

 

[0121stockpicker]

What do you think Stocky's agenda is? I have not been able to figure it out.

New world order baby!!

 

[Rebel - KGC]

New world order baby!!

LOL! INDEED! Like the girls in Sweden...?

 

[ShadowLine]

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about - what points are you talking about? And in a discussion what do you think it means when someone starts getting personal ?

Another example of you avoiding the issue and going off on a tangent. You have yet to address any of the points I have made with anything but a lecture on semantics and your own version of logic. Address the points, or admit you have no platform to stand on. It's really simple. It's actually how internet forums work.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Another example of you avoiding the issue and going off on a tangent. You have yet to address any of the points I have made with anything but a lecture on semantics and your own version of logic. Address the points, or admit you have no platform to stand on. It's really simple. It's actually how internet forums work.

PLATFORM...? Is he running for PREZ...?

 

[ShadowLine]

PLATFORM...? Is he running for PREZ...?

Kudos on continuing to prove my point. That's the tactic ya'll are using. If you have no valid arguments (which you don't) go off on a tangent.

 

[0121stockpicker]

On the contrary, you have YET to show actual proof and you continue to duck questions without exception. You have been asked to answer questions and you have tried to duck them by trying to derail your own thread. You refuse to acknowledge valid points because they are inconvenient to your personal agenda. I'm sorry Picker, I originally pegged you for someone searching to have an open dialogue about controversial topics. Sadly you have shown you wish nothing else but to push your agenda, regardless of the presence (or in your case absence) of facts.

Please, address the points that were raised so we can have a true debate. In the absence of that action it simply appears like you want to pontificate. And on internet boards, that doesn't go over very well.

So what you were proving is your claim that " I claim the 2nd Amendment provides the populace of this country the ability to defend itself against both criminals and a tyrannical government. I claim that the government is at least partially deterred from becoming a tyrannical government because they know the collective power an armed public can bring to bear if necessary. I claim that politicians, in general, are less likely to revoke rights in the constitution because the possibility of an armed revolt exists."

And I not see one shred of evidence that your claims are at all accurate. So I'm not sure what you want me to do?? Prove your case for you?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Closed