UN reopens talks on NRA-opposed Arms Treaty :

If you think just us UNINFORMED folks are paranoid about the UN Treaty , please click my reps link . Read part about UN Treaty . Get the idea ?

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Rep. Kelly Discusses Benghazi and U.N. ATT Controversies on Fox & Friends | Congressman Mike Kelly

He says nothing of substance. Nothing.

Here it is, all of it:

Rep. Kelly leads national opposition to the dangerous U.N. Arms Trade Treaty:

“As a private citizen, have a site called the ATTpetition.com, which allows American citizens to weigh in. … This allows the American people to weigh in on what I think is a very dangerous treaty. … It’s an American issue.”


“It is very clear from this administration, this president, that he has a global vision. Why the United States of America – the strongest defender of freedom and liberty – would ever sit at the table with people like Cuba, Syria, and Iran to come up with an arms policy or trade policy… absolutely bad.”


Note:

The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) has elicited warnings from numerous legal and foreign policy experts who agree that the treaty, as drafted, poses significant threats to the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens, the nation’s domestic defense manufacturing base, and America’s ability to protect and assist our allies including the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the State of Israel.



On March 13, 2013, Rep. Kelly introduced H. Con. Res. 23, a bipartisan concurrent resolution to oppose the ATT in the House of Representatives with 122 original co-sponsors. As a private citizen, he also created an online petition to stop the ATT which has currently garnered more than 20,000 supporters.
 

[QUOTE }The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) has elicited warnings from numerous legal and foreign policy experts who agree that the treaty, as drafted, poses significant threats to the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens, [QUOTE ]

Those words mean nothing ?????? Ummmmm , OK.:dontknow:
 

[QUOTE }The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) has elicited warnings from numerous legal and foreign policy experts who agree that the treaty, as drafted, poses significant threats to the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens, [QUOTE ]

Those words mean nothing ?????? Ummmmm , OK.:dontknow:

Who are the "numerous legal and foreign policy experts" and what is the substance of what their stance is?

It's like doing math with no numbers............
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top