lfskl;adgh;dfkl
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Treasure_Hunter said:I have read books by Greg Perino, I also know lermas were found in Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois... I have several in my collection that came from Missouri/Illinois....
Rainbow Johnson said:Treasure_Hunter said:I think it is a round base lerma, and I don't think it is a 1000 miles off base from your location. Lermas range did also include Indiana, I know they have been found in Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois.....
Their range includes Indiana if you believe all the mis information thats out there. I was also told it's an angostura and an agate basin. It's actually a mid-late woodland blade. John Ray, Mike, and Josh are onto something with their posts. This is a highly unusual blade style for this area and most collectors here are stumped trying to give it a name. The outline most closely resembles a modesto of the Scherschel complex but the workmanship and material proves it's not. I'm not one to rewrite the books on point distribution. A lot more than outline goes into naming points but hey you can call it what you want. The link that shows lermas coming all the way to Indiana also shows fulton turkey tails going all the way to Maine (??) and aftons going all the way to Ohio (intrusive mound cluster). That typology site is an absolute joke. I sat up with a friend last evening going through it and we found error after error. I suggest opening a book by Greg Perino. Good discussion.
Neanderthal said:Treasure_Hunter said:I have read books by Greg Perino, I also know lermas were found in Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois... I have several in my collection that came from Missouri/Illinois....
You can find points that LOOK like Lerma everywhere, but that doesn't mean they are the same point, or people.
I don't think anyone needs to contact Overstreet and tell them to republish because opinions given.I don't know if the point I found is Lerma or not but as stated I have not found any other point to correctly Identify my find but Lerma.Your find resembles mine and until proven to me that it is something else I am calling it Lerma for now.What do I know I am not a authenticator by no means.Just rely on books published for referenceTreasure_Hunter said:Rainbow Johnson said:Treasure_Hunter said:I think it is a round base lerma, and I don't think it is a 1000 miles off base from your location. Lermas range did also include Indiana, I know they have been found in Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois.....
Their range includes Indiana if you believe all the mis information thats out there. I was also told it's an angostura and an agate basin. It's actually a mid-late woodland blade. John Ray, Mike, and Josh are onto something with their posts. This is a highly unusual blade style for this area and most collectors here are stumped trying to give it a name. The outline most closely resembles a modesto of the Scherschel complex but the workmanship and material proves it's not. I'm not one to rewrite the books on point distribution. A lot more than outline goes into naming points but hey you can call it what you want. The link that shows lermas coming all the way to Indiana also shows fulton turkey tails going all the way to Maine (??) and aftons going all the way to Ohio (intrusive mound cluster). That typology site is an absolute joke. I sat up with a friend last evening going through it and we found error after error. I suggest opening a book by Greg Perino. Good discussion.
Neanderthal said:Treasure_Hunter said:I have read books by Greg Perino, I also know lermas were found in Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois... I have several in my collection that came from Missouri/Illinois....
You can find points that LOOK like Lerma everywhere, but that doesn't mean they are the same point, or people.
Then maybe someone should notify Overstreet Indian Arrowheads Identification And Price Guide and tell them they are wrong so they can rewrite their book since they list Lerma Round Base as coming from that area, and even have pictures of some Lermas found in TN...
ShowmeMoflint said:I walk about 80 percent creeks versus fields for the simple fact that I find more whole points per ratio than I would field walking.Plus there seems to be a better quality of flint and knapping.Hope you can get your point typed correctly.There is wide variety of typology books available but the problem still lies some points found are hard to type.
Treasure_Hunter said:Then maybe someone should notify Overstreet Indian Arrowheads Identification And Price Guide and tell them they are wrong so they can rewrite their book since they list Lerma Round Base as coming from that area, and even have pictures of some Lermas found in TN...
Neanderthal said:Treasure_Hunter said:Then maybe someone should notify Overstreet Indian Arrowheads Identification And Price Guide and tell them they are wrong so they can rewrite their book since they list Lerma Round Base as coming from that area, and even have pictures of some Lermas found in TN...
Do you think Robert Overstreet comes up with the information in there on his own? No. Collectors send him points and tell him what they are, and he puts them in those categories. I know this, I submitted some for one years ago. So, you aren't drawing from his knowledge, you are getting whatever Tom, Dick & Harry want to call them - regardless of their knowledge of points. This is why you'll find so many flaws in it. I'm not just picking on Overstreet either, most publications out there are no better, and a few even worse!
I could go on all day and point out the flaws, but won't. I will say that the later issues appear to be greatly improved over the earlier ones. It's good for a book with pretty pictures of pretty points and I still believe collectors should own them. But if you're looking for an accurate source for typology, it's not your best bet.
Now that is a possibility Nodena is kinda more like it than a Lerma.But it could go either way.I guess it really depends on where it was found.I do agree that typology books have errors just like anything else no one is perfectRoad Dog said:My first thought.....Lerma, but Karnak and Nodena are good possibilities.