Speaking of overtones of superiority: this is a posting from SUBARCH regarding UNESCO by the Texas A&M communist:
Re: Unesco Convention will be active January, 3rd, 2009
From: Filipe Castro <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Underwater Archaeology Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:34:10 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain
Every month or so I come to Sub-Arch and find out that you have been arguing
again.

)
As I am sure that you are all dying to know my opinion, here it goes:
I think that the UNESCO Convention has lots of potentially bad and lots of
potentially good things in it.
When I see a bureaucrat I feel exactly the same as Jesus feels when he sees
a cross, and this Convention empowers an international group of bureaucrats,
most of them so mean and so anal that they would make Stalin's politbureau
blush.
Anyway, I think that it is a necessary evil: unfortunately THs tend to be
incredibly shallow, no matter how low they sink (themselves and their
devices

), and we need protection from them (as we need protection from
the Wall Street crowd, drunk drivers, etc).
I am therefore happy that it is in business, for two main reasons:
"Rule 2. The commercial exploitation of underwater cultural heritage for
trade or
speculation or its irretrievable dispersal is fundamentally incompatible
with the protection and proper management of underwater cultural heritage.
Underwater cultural heritage shall not be traded, sold, bought or bartered
as commercial goods."
This is just self-evident, plain common sense, and therefore deserves no
comment. The second reason is very important:
"Rule 36. A final synthesis of a project shall be: (a) MADE PUBLIC as soon
as possible, having regard to the complexity of the project and the
confidential or sensitive nature of the information; and (b) deposited in
relevant public records."
Even though the state bureaucrats that crafted the Convention were careful
not promise too much here, I am afraid that this is the most relevant Rule
of the entire document. I know that all THs and many archaeologists
(mostly European) will hate Rule 36, but things that are not published and
peer-reviewed do not exist. And if archaeologists want to be taken
seriously, they will have to produce their primary data.
Filipe
Pirate Diver