For me, the ultimate genius is that one does not make sense without the other. You need the Stone Maps to make sense of the area to which they apply, and you need the right area in order to make sense of the Stone Maps. Each of them on their own, does not make any sense at all. This is a very clever approach and one that essentially prevents accidental discovery, because nothing in the field lines up quite properly- everything is just slightly offset. You may
noto triangulum in the field, but as it’s offset just enough, you’ll be digging in solid rock for a very long time if you didn’t have the Stone Maps to refer to, to understand what’s really going on. Makes me think of the Van der Rohe quote “God is in the details.”
Someone put in some really serious thought into this. Someone who had a lot of time to think about this from every angle. It was as useful a mental exercise for them as much as it is for us. It’s designed to reward patience and punish haste.
For you or anyone to try and decipher the maps on their own is as useful as trying to guess the layout of a map just from the map legend alone, which is an exercise in impossibility. I have attached an example of a map legend and from this I challenge you to envision what the actual map looks like.
View attachment 1677082