The Story As Told By Beale To Morriss Keeps Changing

To have not seen something and yet know it and it's intended use is such a great gift! Faith it must be. For if a man thinks he came from a monkey takes more faith then to believe in an all knowing creator!...
What in the world has this to do with the BEALE PAPERS? THE HART PAPERS? or even THE SIMPSON PAPERS?
...or this discussion?
 

What in the world has this to do with the BEALE PAPERS? THE HART PAPERS? or even THE SIMPSON PAPERS?
...or this discussion?

You should quote the whole quote not just Cherry pick out of context!
 

That opening statement was "out of context" for the comments that followed, especially that directed "fear" remark of which you closed.
 

More and more the truth is progressing out of the Beale letters to Morriss. It is resemblance of something possibly fabricated by Beale in order to hide real event's. It is with all possiblity a total fabricated story line by Beale and his group as not to bring negative recourse on to themselves with the letters to Morriss. The Ciphers should clear up the story lines and hopefully give us the truth of the event that took place as to need ciphers to convey it!

You are suggesting the Beale papers are a cover up ( undeciphered yet) to a cover up ?
A hidden cover up no one could figure out how to read.....to not attract attention to a real event.

That theory has already been presented as a massacre whitewashing.
Your " us" must then include that theorist.
The seemingly incompatible shocking contrast between two of your " us's" as presented by themselves then would need to be noted. ( And have been.)

Interesting....Incompatible principles per alleged persona's , yet they argue not with each other online ,but with others.
 

You are suggesting the Beale papers are a cover up ( undeciphered yet) to a cover up ?
A hidden cover up no one could figure out how to read.....to not attract attention to a real event.

That theory has already been presented as a massacre whitewashing.
Your " us" must then include that theorist.
The seemingly incompatible shocking contrast between two of your " us's" as presented by themselves then would need to be noted. ( And have been.)

Interesting....Incompatible principles per alleged persona's , yet they argue not with each other online ,but with others.

Like what we have seen someone here say beforehand, the first letter to Morriss did not include much about a gold mining expedition! The Beale Progressively moves closer to the truth of the matter with the letters number 2 and 3 found in the looked box. Step 3 is the simple message found in the page two decipherments by the person in 1800's. That was page C2's first deciphering, at this was declared by someone here as nothing but a false lead to put off the real trail of the ciphers real intent that would need a key to unlock the information!
 

" That was page C2's first deciphering, at this was declared by someone here as nothing but ato put off the real trail of the ciphers real intent that would need a key to unlock the information"

How can you make a statement like this to be true? You would have to have the "KEY" or have C1, C2 deciphered?

The best part of your statement is: " false lead" Now you can take a "false lead" then you can make up anything you want. That is why the "author" wrote the story the way he did, he knew if you could not solve it you would branch out after these "false leads" to give you hope of finding the treasure---a treasure---hell any treasure? But there is no treasure to find period, no ciphers to solve, just a local story. Sad.
 

Like what we have seen someone here say beforehand, the first letter to Morriss did not include much about a gold mining expedition! The Beale Progressively moves closer to the truth of the matter with the letters number 2 and 3 found in the looked box. Step 3 is the simple message found in the page two decipherments by the person in 1800's. That was page C2's first deciphering, at this was declared by someone here as nothing but a false lead to put off the real trail of the ciphers real intent that would need a key to unlock the information!

So now it's "Beale" again? :laughing7: Masterpoe, beyond interest in your fantastical fictional tale, you guys are never going to find any knowledgeable people to give your manufactured fictional tale any serious consideration. Heck, you guys don't even remain consistent in all of your creative fodder.
 

Like what we have seen someone here say beforehand, the first letter to Morriss did not include much about a gold mining expedition! The Beale Progressively moves closer to the truth of the matter with the letters number 2 and 3 found in the looked box. Step 3 is the simple message found in the page two decipherments by the person in 1800's. That was page C2's first deciphering, at this was declared by someone here as nothing but a false lead to put off the real trail of the ciphers real intent that would need a key to unlock the information!

Your post is about as garbled as mine tend to get.....
I have replies for each line ,but overall as to what other people say or claim ...if you are working ciphers ,why are you not ignoring others attempts and opinions?
Which takes us back to the post you replied to. And possibly missed the point of.

When you wrote "us" ,it suggests you are working with a group. The more you work with groups the more you will realize that one assigned or joined to you is very different than one you establish.
In matters of great importance the entire group needs to be vetted. By you. For multiple reasons.....
Then any gathered information needs to be vetted.

When/if you study I.T. towards you afore mentioned interest in decoding you might encounter reasons for how teams are set up. Duplication of effort is not a goal. Corrupted data that was clear to start... gets that way by more , rather than less manipulation.
 

" That was page C2's first deciphering, at this was declared by someone here as nothing but ato put off the real trail of the ciphers real intent that would need a key to unlock the information"

How can you make a statement like this to be true? You would have to have the "KEY" or have C1, C2 deciphered?

The best part of your statement is: " false lead" Now you can take a "false lead" then you can make up anything you want. That is why the "author" wrote the story the way he did, he knew if you could not solve it you would branch out after these "false leads" to give you hope of finding the treasure---a treasure---hell any treasure? But there is no treasure to find period, no ciphers to solve, just a local story. Sad.

The easy cipher would be the one to be a false lead!
 

More and more the truth is progressing out of the Beale letters to Morriss. It is resemblance of something possibly fabricated by Beale in order to hide real event's. It is with all possiblity a total fabricated story line by Beale and his group as not to bring negative recourse on to themselves with the letters to Morriss. The Ciphers should clear up the story lines and hopefully give us the truth of the event that took place as to need ciphers to convey it!

Very good job! 1822 there were some interesting changes going on in the area of the mind location. Time was on Beale's side!


Tone Detection ( Formal, Optimistic, Friendly )
 

Very good job! 1822 there were some interesting changes going on in the area of the mind location. Time was on Beale's side!


Tone Detection ( Formal, Optimistic, Friendly )

{interesting changes going on in the area of the mind location}

Indeed!
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top