Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Jan 21, 2005
- 7,841
- 9,867
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
HOLA Mike (and everyone)
As you are speculating, I will present another speculation which could explain why stone for the maps, and why they were "dumped" along the trail instead of at the last treasure site.
They chose stone for the maps as it is cheap and durable, and could be left buried in the ground without much danger of it rotting or otherwise decomposing. I still think paper or leather would have been much better on several grounds, but perhaps the person making the maps didn't have any?
So a party made the stone maps (from material which came quite some distance away) and was using them to find their way to the treasures when they were sudenly attacked by Indios - then either in the excitement of the fray, with the mules bucking and becoming frightened causing the stone maps to be lost from their packs, or later after the Indios had either killed all of the party or scattered them, the same Indios then find the stone maps in the packs on the mules and see no use for them so dump them on the spot. Alternatively, the mule carrying the stones breaks loose during the attack, and runs away (a frightened horse or mule can be extremely hard to hold on to) only to shake the pack loose later on, perhaps days later. This scenario would mean that it is likely the search party did not succeed in finding the treasures and were either killed or ran back to Mexico.
All of this is pure speculation of course as we have no evidence to support it, not even an old rotted mule pack saddle found nearby which would have helped a great deal. I don't think my scenario presented above is correct, or Tumlinson ought to have found at least some treasures.
Oroblanco
As you are speculating, I will present another speculation which could explain why stone for the maps, and why they were "dumped" along the trail instead of at the last treasure site.
They chose stone for the maps as it is cheap and durable, and could be left buried in the ground without much danger of it rotting or otherwise decomposing. I still think paper or leather would have been much better on several grounds, but perhaps the person making the maps didn't have any?
So a party made the stone maps (from material which came quite some distance away) and was using them to find their way to the treasures when they were sudenly attacked by Indios - then either in the excitement of the fray, with the mules bucking and becoming frightened causing the stone maps to be lost from their packs, or later after the Indios had either killed all of the party or scattered them, the same Indios then find the stone maps in the packs on the mules and see no use for them so dump them on the spot. Alternatively, the mule carrying the stones breaks loose during the attack, and runs away (a frightened horse or mule can be extremely hard to hold on to) only to shake the pack loose later on, perhaps days later. This scenario would mean that it is likely the search party did not succeed in finding the treasures and were either killed or ran back to Mexico.
All of this is pure speculation of course as we have no evidence to support it, not even an old rotted mule pack saddle found nearby which would have helped a great deal. I don't think my scenario presented above is correct, or Tumlinson ought to have found at least some treasures.
Oroblanco