- Thread starter
- #61
No, itās not convincing, the first (in your opinion) publication of the map and precisely with the background was not provided. I first came across this topic in a fairly respected publication, I donāt remember which one, it seems, āArguments and Factsā and it was described there that Louās card appeared in the hands of āKarl Von MĆ¼llerā due to the fact that he secretly took this drawing out of the service when he served in Nazi Germany. All his life he tried to decipher the map, but in vain, and before his death, in despair, he published with a backstory about Nazi gold. Then, periodically, this backstory was published in editions of other articles. Your āKarl Von MĆ¼llerā whom you cite is most likely already different .Easy, because you clearly haven't gone far enough back in your research. Crow and I have both told you, in detail, how the LUE - Nazi Connection was a mid-1990s theory, put forth on these very forums, by a man named Richard Walburn who was a LUE enthusiast. As best I can tell, your research on the LUE itself begins in the 1990s with Richard Walburn, plain and simple. Research on the LUE (as literally spelled out) begins verifiably in 1964 when Karl von Mueller first published the map in Treasure Hunters Manual #7. He and other treasure publications frequently mentioned the LUE for the next 10 years, and then sporadically for another 10 or 15. The single most informative and exhaustive written piece on the LUE to date (besides my own YouTube presentation) was from the National Prospectorās Gazette - Oct/Nov 1969 (Vol. 6 No. 2). This was written by Karl von Mueller as well. Your second most important piece of information are several references and drawings published in a book in 1972 called Treasure of the Valley of Secrets. This was written by Deek Gladson, a pen name of Karl von Mueller. You may notice a pattern here. These items are crucial for a LUE researcher, but these aren't things that are easily available and the majority are not in digital format (at least not published on the web). It seems like your own research is hampered by being overly reliant on the internet, living outside of the U.S., and not being alive in the mid 1970s. And for the record, none of the material from the 1960s, 1970s, or 1980s mentions the LUE and Nazis together. Karl mentioned book published in 1935. This lead was published by Karl von Mueller, and to date nobody I've spoken to has ever secured a copy. Finding one, would be a critical step forward as it would take the provenance of the LUE out of the hands of Karl von Mueller and potentially provide additional information, history, or clues to the map itself which is supposedly published in the book. I have at least 59 pre-Walburn references from 1964 to 1991, not a single mention of the Nazis.
Not sure I've seen anyone on this particular thread suggest the map was made for entertainment. The fact that so much of the LUE material begins and ends with Karl von Mueller is admittedly problematic from a research standpoint. There are some who believe he wrote it as a joke, but if he did he worked very hard for over 20 years to keep that joke alive and constantly left himself vulnerable to being exposed. I prefer to think he sincerely reported what he knew, and have nearly a dozen letters Karl wrote to others to suggest this was the case. Lying to magazine subscribers is one thing, lying to people you've known for decades as fellow treasure hunters and business associates is another altogether.
Karl never published a backstory other than how he came by the map. He suggested the map might be Spanish or Jesuit...others have suggested Mayan, Aztec, Franciscan. More recently, the KGC have been linked to the map. The truth is, it doesn't meet any of these possibilities very well and Karl was by all accounts more focused on recovering the treasure(s) than who placed them there in the first place. It's well known that Karl reportedly made a recovery at Black Lake (Eagles's Nest), New Mexico and Karl reported many other cache locations as he asserted the map led to multiple (as many as 15) cache points throughout Colorado, New Mexico, and Mexico proper.
When it comes to the LUE, there's very little I'm CERTAIN of. One thing (one of the few things) I AM certain of:
THE LUE IS NOT RELATED IN ANY FASHION TO THE NAZIS.
Moreover, according to the āCrowā participant, when faced with facts, I ignore them, and this is what supposedly egocentrics do (He probably works as a highly paid doctor, since he easily makes diagnoses from a distance).
The facts he cited, so meticulously selected, are supposed to be facts. boil down to only 1. - gold could not be transported to America (but this is not certain) I gave the answer before that not only by submarines and that it could well. 2. America did not plan to participate in World War II (but this is not certain) I already gave the answer America had to enter the war since Hitler planned to start a war with the West. 3. Germany did not have enough gold before the start of the war to bring it to America (but this is not certain) and he could have found the answer in Hitlerās report that he sent to me (but for this you need to think, and this is precious time).
I did not come across actual facts that refute the theory (obviously, excerpts were carefully selected to discredit the theory, thereby justifying its failure)
And I have a question, with everyone who corresponded with you, did you accidentally ask the question - āSo why was the card named -Lu?ā (No? Strange.) I explained to everyone why and, in my opinion, convincingly - no?
This is psychology, the author took into account the psychology of the majority, the first level of protection for the card is 1. all those who cannot understand and decipher the card will side with its critics and will foam at the mouth to prove its inconsistency and will search for and pull up āfactsā, thus thereby discouraging any desire to engage in deciphering seriously.
Š” ŃŠ²Š°Š¶ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµŠ¼, Š”ŠµŃŠ³ŠµŠ¹ 3.