- May 9, 2012
- 23,957
- 81,254
- Primary Interest:
- Other
A dome rock in the water? Must be another Templar Treasure Vault.
A Templar vault for sure. Within a Rosicrucian amphitheater , carved into it by Pirate freemasons maybe....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A dome rock in the water? Must be another Templar Treasure Vault.
The very first mention of this alleged 80 foot stone was in a letter by J b McCully in a sent letter to the newspaper "HALIFAX SUN AND ADVISOR" published June 2, 1862.You all contested the existence of anything related to the stone and acted like it was a complete lie and an invented farce...
I posted real pics of the original stone ...
With clues to its whereabouts in the Bible.
Eldo needs to do a better job of writing fiction if he ever wishes to compete with the laginas and have a fictional drama cable show.
Looks like eldo is back at it after losing all credibility yesterday. Probably posting his photoshopped images again with his fictional tales in an attempt to be relevant.
Folks saw through his fiction years ago.....glad I don’t have to see it anymore.
Perhaps he needs to intern under Scott Wolter and learn how to at least tell a fictional tale that while totally bogus is interesting to listen to.
In September 2009, History Channel aired the two-hour special "Holy Grail in America", produced by Committee Films,[SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][9][/SUP] which follows Scott Wolter as he explores the idea that the Kensington Runestone is evidence that the Knights Templar sailed to America about one hundred years before Columbus's voyage.[SUP][9][/SUP]
Reviewer Paul Mavis characterized "Holy Grail in America" as enjoyable pseudoscientific entertainment in the tradition of the 1970s television series In Search of…. Mavis noted that, "tellingly, the doc never presents any other geologists who have alternative theories about Wolter's findings" but concluded, "who cares if it's true or not? It's fun."[SUP][9][/SUP]
Looks like eldo is back at it after losing all credibility yesterday. Probably posting his photoshopped images again with his fictional tales in an attempt to be relevant.
Folks saw through his fiction years ago.....glad I don’t have to see it anymore.
Perhaps he needs to intern under Scott Wolter and learn how to at least tell a fictional tale that while totally bogus is interesting to listen to.
Looks like eldo is back at it after losing all credibility yesterday. Probably posting his photoshopped images again with his fictional tales in an attempt to be relevant.
Folks saw through his fiction years ago.....glad I don’t have to see it anymore.
Perhaps he needs to intern under Scott Wolter and learn how to at least tell a fictional tale that while totally bogus is interesting to listen to.
I'll believe you when you start spending it. ;-)
If Bacon was able to convince Richard Bancroft (Archbishop of Canterbury who was in charge of the translations) to allow "alterations" and King James was good with burying much needed funds that could have been used in the hostilities with Spain or the Jacobite home troubles at the then very real threat of the 30 Years War dragging Britian in . . . it STILL makes no sense to seperate treasure from ready uses in a foreign territory.
I call Shenanigans on the whole concept.
Bacon had nothing to do whatsoever with any involvement with the translation and/or writing of the King James Bible, or final edits or involved with the printing.Written in part by Bacon, the New King James Version of the Bible held the same encrypted tales as were found complimenting the Shakespearean texts...
He sure is going the distance with this current round on nonsense.Looks like eldo is back at it after losing all credibility yesterday. Probably posting his photoshopped images again with his fictional tales in an attempt to be relevant...
Bacon had nothing to do whatsoever with any involvement with the translation and/or writing of the King James Bible, or final edits or involved with the printing.
As noted by Charlie P (NY), Richard Bancroft oversaw 47 clergyman and scholars divided between six committees, two each from Westminster, Cambridge, and Oxford.
There are NO hidden encrypted codes by Bacon in the King James Bible, nor maps in the works of Shakespeare that have anything to do with treasure, be it on Oak Island or on a dome rock in Vermont, just fact less fevered fabricated fringe fantasies.
Eldo, please cite the source of this fable, or are you another to declare all the professional academics, scholars, and historians are wrong, like another pseudo history poster poseur?He had the Bible for an entire year to himself to provide the final additions and edits
It was not wealth of a physical nature...it was Esoteric "Wealth" as it was written.....also the trove was legitimately identified as being from Rennes Le Chateau
Therefore it could not be claimed as being the "Lost Wealth of the Templars" as is seen in these legends, but clearly had something to do with Dagobert II.
The stone cipher clearly states that the "Treasure There Has A New DISCOVERY Of The Bible"
He sure is going the distance with this current round on nonsense.
That borders on a religious remark than is frowned upon by the Mods, and really has nothing to do with this discussion.But the numbers seen in Revelations are 666 and then immediately it moves to the discussion of the 144,000 souls saved....nothing to worry about if you are a "disbeliever"
As apparently you are also doing, Eldo, our Burlington, Vermont friend.Its literally 11:39pm here and you and Singlestack are still trolling trying to find closure propagating another front...