Juskevicius
Jr. Member
- #101
Thread Owner
The same question I could ask you. Why author has created 3 ciphers instead of 1 plain text?... so that everyone will continue to know absolutely nothing about it?.....![]()
The same question I could ask you. Why author has created 3 ciphers instead of 1 plain text?... so that everyone will continue to know absolutely nothing about it?.....![]()
The same question I could ask you. Why author has created 3 ciphers instead of 1 plain text?
I don’t know your encryption/decryption skills, but you have no understanding of linguistics.
Here is a simple cipher containing a grammatically correct clear text in English. Tell me what your data suggest? And then I’ll show you the correct clear text and also something very profound as to why you can't even begin to assume that your data is accurate:
16, 288, 27, 39, 1988, 125, 29, 1473, 111, 84, 93, 104, 99, 125, 11, 18, 37, 331, 294, 5, 26, 188, 171, 26, 122, 29, 30, 1299, 13, 6, 1387, 1554, 19, 87, 56, 65, 63, 88, 10, 71, 54, 1335, 22, 87, 43, 77, 17, 20, 128, 81, 68, 119, 16, 200, 42, 103, 1578, 54, 40, 60, 2, 86, 70, 16, 6, 87, 107, 80, 221, 119, 331, 881, 1130, 1111, 12, 3, 62, 99, 18, 131, 15, 33, 21, 58, 50, 11, 26, 184, 55, 491, 301, 13, 286, 14, 7, 41, 38, 1440, 22, 114, 263, 288, 57, 73, 9, 15, 286, 1991, 76, 30, 80, 103.
In other words. Do you ask me, what does it mean? It could be whatever. Depends on area, no KEY, no HINTS - no additional info.
View attachment 1921262
Here is a simple cipher containing a grammatically correct clear text in English. Tell me what your data suggest? And then I’ll show you the correct clear text and also something very profound as to why you can't even begin to assume that your data is accurate:
16, 288, 27, 39, 1988, 125, 29, 1473, 111, 84, 93, 104, 99, 125, 11, 18, 37, 331, 294, 5, 26, 188, 171, 26, 122, 29, 30, 1299, 13, 6, 1387, 1554, 19, 87, 56, 65, 63, 88, 10, 71, 54, 1335, 22, 87, 43, 77, 17, 20, 128, 81, 68, 119, 16, 200, 42, 103, 1578, 54, 40, 60, 2, 86, 70, 16, 6, 87, 107, 80, 221, 119, 331, 881, 1130, 1111, 12, 3, 62, 99, 18, 131, 15, 33, 21, 58, 50, 11, 26, 184, 55, 491, 301, 13, 286, 14, 7, 41, 38, 1440, 22, 114, 263, 288, 57, 73, 9, 15, 286, 1991, 76, 30, 80, 103.
Juskevicius, not sure if you are using a program you built or by hand
here is one made for Beale, runs on win OS, i think english only
https://www.angelfire.com/pro/bealeciphers/Page5.htm
love the enthusiasm, somewhere here in the Beale forum/threads I
posted some books that where around 4 sale in a newspaper clip.
are you related to E. Juskevicius the soccer player, yes i like soccer
I know some European names are common like Smith/Brown here
This is very cool..I like this program!!
Juskevicius, not sure if you are using a program you built or by hand
here is one made for Beale, runs on win OS, i think english only
https://www.angelfire.com/pro/bealeciphers/Page5.htm
love the enthusiasm, somewhere here in the Beale forum/threads I
posted some books that where around 4 sale in a newspaper clip.
are you related to E. Juskevicius the soccer player, yes i like soccer
I know some European names are common like Smith/Brown here
Thank you. I didn't know about this program. It should be useful for me. Used an ordinary office application LibreOffice Base.
YEP! DA BEST!This is Ron's website, known him for years and we have frequently discussed the Beale narration and ciphers, still do on occasion. I think I first came into contact with Ron in the 90's. Good guy, for sure.