Test IF Obama Even Has Right To Issue 2nd Amend Orders

BuffaloBob

Bronze Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
1,367
Reaction score
263
Golden Thread
0
Location
Rocky Mountains
Detector(s) used
Minelab X-Terra 705 Gold Coil
deteknixXpointer Probe
Minelab Ex-Terra 70
White's Classic II
2014-2015 Colorado Gold Camp Prospector
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
The litmus test for Constitution revision is in the Supreme Court now. Regarding specific qualifications for office. And the decision will prove, to all, just how strong our Republic really is. The actions were the height of un-American activities ever enacted. What amounts to a "silent coup" and control of the government. However the Supreme court decides, will mean the life or death of the United States Of America. Pass it on.....
BB

[h=2]Saturday, February 16, 2013[/h]OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
[TABLE="class: MsoNormalTable"]
[TR]
[TD]

VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
AP - WASHINGTON D.C.

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group
"Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college
transcripts from Occidental College ... Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama,
under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as
an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a
court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript
shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for
foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the
scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors
have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no
record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has
created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's
legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned,"
leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first
official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups,
Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments
concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of
New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president..
Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship
or qualification to serve as president.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation
of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000


in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block
disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing
but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. Attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has
refused to comment on the matter...

LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T!

Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?

While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM

did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:
What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?

So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel

room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?

And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport


was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers.

It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or


an Indonesian passport.

If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on

August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport
that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or
American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become

a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress

and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of
all this, the better.

If you Don't care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution,

then Delete this, and then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is
already on life-support, and won't survive much longer.

If you do care then Forward this to as many patriotic Americans as you can.


[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Posted by John MacHaffie at 8:34 AM
 

Sorry BB you got duped by a hoax. This ones been called out as a complete fabrication already. No Supreme Court case etc etc. always double check this stuff with primary sources before passing along misinformation. Too much junk on Internet and emails, etc. always be skeptical and practice critical thinking.
 

Whatever dude... Here's what I see:
BB

  • Login with Facebook to see what your friends are reading
  • Enable Social Reading
  • i



[h=1]Orly Taitz Celebrates As Birther Case Is Referred To High Court[/h] The Huffington Post | By John Celock Posted: 01/09/2013 6:49 pm EST | Updated: 01/15/2013 9:22 am EST








792thers, Off The Bus, Video, Chief Justice John Roberts, Obama: Take 2, Electoral College, John Roberts, Keith Judd, Orly Taitz Birther, US Supreme Court, Birther Movement, Debra Bowen, Keith Judd West Virginia, Obama Birthers, Orly Taitz Lawsuit, Politics News







s-ORLY-TAITZ-large.jpg
Birther queen Orly Taitz



Birther queen Orly Taitz is celebrating a routine U.S. Supreme Court decision to refer her petition, which asks the court to overturn President Barack Obama's election, to a February conference of the justices.


Taitz posted on her website Wednesday afternoon that the Supreme Court will discuss a case she filed on behalf of three minor presidential candidates -- including a federal prison inmate -- at their conference Feb. 15. The court's website confirms that Taitz's case, which she submitted to Chief Justice John Roberts' office last month, has been placed on the Feb. 15 conference agenda and has been distributed to the nine justices for consideration.


The roughly 10,000 petitions that the court receives annually are referred to the regular conference meetings for discussion, then around 100 are picked by the justices for oral arguments and a final decision. The votes of four justices in the conference are needed to schedule arguments. The scheduling comes a week after another birther activist suggested impeaching Roberts if he attempted to swear-in Obama later this month.


The long odds have not deterred Taitz, a lawyer, dentist and real estate agent in Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif., from celebrating Wednesday's decision. Taitz filed the case on behalf of Edward Noonan, who won the American Independent Party presidential primary in California, Thomas Gregory MacLeran, who ran for the Republican presidential nomination, and Keith Judd, who challenged Obama in the Democratic primary. Judd, who is currently in federal prison, received 41 percent of the vote against Obama in the West Virginia primary. Taitz has said that if Obama was disqualified from the ballot Judd would have been the Democratic presidential nominee based on his West Virginia votes.

Taitz's case argues that Obama is using false identification, a fake last name, a false Social Security number and forged birth certificates, and Selective Service applications to run for president. She originally filed the lawsuit against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (D) in her attempt to prevent California's electoral votes from being counted and to prevent Vice President Joe Biden from counting the electoral votes earlier this month.


A federal judge in California dismissed this case last week. Taitz likened her current case to Watergate.

"Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison," Taitz wrote on her website.
"ObamaForgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number."

[h=1]Supreme Court to review case on Obama's forged documents (Photos)[/h]

14 photosView the full slideshow »









53
202 Email


[h=2][/h]
 

Attachments

  • OB_)5.webp
    OB_)5.webp
    33.7 KB · Views: 114
Media Blackout of (P)resident Obama supreme court cases.
BB

[h=1]MEDIA BLACKOUT: Obama Forged IDs & Eligibility "Heard in Conference" Before the Full Supreme Court... T O D A Y ![/h] February 15, 2013


Demand-Investigation-into-Obama-Eligibility-Requirements-for-President-and-Second-Term-Run.jpeg
Chief Justice John Roberts Schedules A Case Regarding Obamas Forged IDs to be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court. Date: FEBRUARY 19, 2013.The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

More from Huffington Post:
Taitz's case argues that Obama is using false identification, a fake last name, a false Social Security number and forged birth certificates, and Selective Service applications to run for president. She originally filed the lawsuit against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (D) in her attempt to prevent California's electoral votes from being counted and to prevent Vice President Joe Biden from counting the electoral votes earlier this month.










A federal judge in California dismissed this case last week. Taitz likened her current case to Watergate.

"Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison," Taitz wrote on her website.

"ObamaForgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number."

SCOTUS printout is below. For more information on this

and other cases please, go to web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Attorney Taitz can be contacted at orly.taitz@gmail.com, fax-949-766-7603. In case of an emergency only she can be contacted by phone 949-683-5411

Follow us: @redflagnews on Twitter







No. 12A606

Title:

.

.

Docketed:

Lower Ct:

Case Nos.:




.

Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
December 13, 2012
Supreme Court of California
(S207078)




Date
Dec 11 2012
Dec 13 2012
Dec 26 2012

Jan 9 2013
Jan 9 2013



Proceedings and Orders

Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.

Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Application (12A606) referred to the Court.








Follow us: @redflagnews on Twitter





noonan2bdenied.jpg







url-5.jpeg
 

BB - this is not a real Associated Press release.


VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
AP - WASHINGTON D.C.

And if you believe it's real, how can you say there is a media blackout when you have an "AP" story published?? Which is it?
 

Picker don't mean to be rude but I blocked you. This stuff is important to me and if it bothers you, please don't read it. :)
BB
 

Decision is in. And so is (P)resident Obama.
BB

[h=1]Supreme Court denies Obama birther eligibility case Noonan v. Bowen (Photos)[/h]

[QUOTEOn Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States rejected a birther eligibility case against President Barack Obama. Docket No. 12A606 entitled Noonan v. Bowen is listed on the SCOTUS website. On Feb. 19, the nation's highest court stated:

Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

The plaintiffs contend that Obama used forged government IDs and a fake social security number in order to run for political office. (See YouTube video at the bottom on CNN's 2008 story on Obama's alleged real father Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying communist who the president mentions in his autobiography Dreams from My Father.)




In 2008, the Associated Press obtained Obama's Indonesian grade school registration which, when translated into English, identifies him as an Indonesian citizen.
Photo credit:
AP




*Note: Subscribe to Republican Examiner for updates
On Tuesday, Orly Taitz - an attorney for the plaintiffs - conveyed some additional allegations against the president beyond what was included in Noona's case pleadings. This week, an unidentified source has informed the California-based lawyer that the reason why Michelle Robinson Obama (a graduate of Harvard Law School) ceased to have a law license in Illinois is because she got in trouble for letting Barack Obama use a relative's social security number (Harrison J. Bounel).


The SSN 042-68-4425 is simultaneously tied to Obama and Bounel in background check systems. The source's claim is unsubstantiated. However, birthers are currently investigating the allegation.


On Tuesday, the plaintiffs also protested lower-level clerks' decision to withhold the Supplemental Brief and other case pleadings from several of the Supreme Court justices. Taitz had vouched for a thorough review of the arguments to as many of the high court's judges.


Court records show that on Dec. 26, 2012, or three weeks before Obama's second inauguration, Chief Justice John Roberts reversed Justice Anthony Kennedy's rejection and ordered the case distributed for conference on Feb. 15.

Related: Is Obama a pathalogical liar?


However, on that day SCOTUS released its list of granted petitions and Noonan v. Bowen was not included. Tuesday's decision is a major setback for the birther movement as the federal government's judicial branch has rejected hearing the case.


While there are multiple lower-level lawsuits, such as in California and Washington, birthers now appear to be targeting members of congress to initiate formal hearings which could lead to impeachment of the president.

Impeachment is highly unlikely given that Democrats control the U.S. senate. House Republicans have also been unwilling to investigate Obama's personal and professional background in light of urgent tasks, including the need to address the March 1 sequestration cuts. During the 2012 presidential elections, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and his Super Pacs also abstained from questioning Obama's eligibility to serve as president.



On Feb. 17, Taitz sent a request for an investigation to Rep. Bob Goodlatte (Virginia, Republican), who serves as chair of the judiciary committee in the house of representatives.


Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

Thus far, an online petition requesting a formal investigation into the president's government IDs and SSN have resulted in over 32,000 letters and emails to members of congress.

][/QUOTE]
 

Decision is in. And so is (P)resident Obama.
BB

[h=1]Supreme Court denies Obama birther eligibility case Noonan v. Bowen (Photos)[/h]

[QUOTEOn Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States rejected a birther eligibility case against President Barack Obama. Docket No. 12A606 entitled Noonan v. Bowen is listed on the SCOTUS website. On Feb. 19, the nation's highest court stated:

Feb 19 2013 Application (12A606) denied by the Court.

The plaintiffs contend that Obama used forged government IDs and a fake social security number in order to run for political office. (See YouTube video at the bottom on CNN's 2008 story on Obama's alleged real father Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying communist who the president mentions in his autobiography Dreams from My Father.)




In 2008, the Associated Press obtained Obama's Indonesian grade school registration which, when translated into English, identifies him as an Indonesian citizen.
Photo credit:
AP




*Note: Subscribe to Republican Examiner for updates
On Tuesday, Orly Taitz - an attorney for the plaintiffs - conveyed some additional allegations against the president beyond what was included in Noona's case pleadings. This week, an unidentified source has informed the California-based lawyer that the reason why Michelle Robinson Obama (a graduate of Harvard Law School) ceased to have a law license in Illinois is because she got in trouble for letting Barack Obama use a relative's social security number (Harrison J. Bounel).


The SSN 042-68-4425 is simultaneously tied to Obama and Bounel in background check systems. The source's claim is unsubstantiated. However, birthers are currently investigating the allegation.


On Tuesday, the plaintiffs also protested lower-level clerks' decision to withhold the Supplemental Brief and other case pleadings from several of the Supreme Court justices. Taitz had vouched for a thorough review of the arguments to as many of the high court's judges.


Court records show that on Dec. 26, 2012, or three weeks before Obama's second inauguration, Chief Justice John Roberts reversed Justice Anthony Kennedy's rejection and ordered the case distributed for conference on Feb. 15.

Related: Is Obama a pathalogical liar?


However, on that day SCOTUS released its list of granted petitions and Noonan v. Bowen was not included. Tuesday's decision is a major setback for the birther movement as the federal government's judicial branch has rejected hearing the case.


While there are multiple lower-level lawsuits, such as in California and Washington, birthers now appear to be targeting members of congress to initiate formal hearings which could lead to impeachment of the president.

Impeachment is highly unlikely given that Democrats control the U.S. senate. House Republicans have also been unwilling to investigate Obama's personal and professional background in light of urgent tasks, including the need to address the March 1 sequestration cuts. During the 2012 presidential elections, Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and his Super Pacs also abstained from questioning Obama's eligibility to serve as president.



On Feb. 17, Taitz sent a request for an investigation to Rep. Bob Goodlatte (Virginia, Republican), who serves as chair of the judiciary committee in the house of representatives.


Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

Thus far, an online petition requesting a formal investigation into the president's government IDs and SSN have resulted in over 32,000 letters and emails to members of congress.

][/QUOTE]
 

BuffaloBob said:
Picker don't mean to be rude but I blocked you. This stuff is important to me and if it bothers you, please don't read it. :)
BB

BB this has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. The supposed "AP press release" that you posted is FAKE. Isn't that something you want to know? I assume you posted it thinking it was real? If it was real I would have absolutely no problem what so ever. But it's a fake. No big deal, but don't go getting all defensive. An honest mistake on your part.
 

This has been going on for years now and was debunked ages ago. I hope that you dont want to perpetaute known false informatation whether you want it to be true or not. Best

There was no such Associated Press Story and all indications lead us to believe that this was an April Fools Joke in 2009. This hoax that first appeared on April 1, 2009 has had a few modifications over the years and refuses to die.

There was a court case on January 24, 2010 in Southern California's Santa Ana Supreme Court filed by attorney Orly Taitz but Judge David O. Carter, who presided over the case, dismissed it. In a written statement, Carter said that the court cannot "sweep away the votes of over 68 million Americans with the stroke of a pen, " and "that the U.S. Constitution does not give the court jurisdiction to decide the matter."

An Occidental College spokesperson said that President Obama's records are still sealed and no such transcripts have been released. When asked if the future President used the Obama or Soetoro name at the college, the spokesperson said that although he had not seen the sealed transcripts he had seen a 1981 photo book that was handed out to students and faculty at the beginning of the college year with student photos, names and hometown information. The 1981 photo book had "Barack Obama" under the student's photo and indicated a home state as Hawaii.

There is no "Fulbright Foundation" but there is a Fulbright program that is sponsored by the US Department of State and does award scholarship grants to students working towards higher degrees who already have a Bachelor of Arts degree. The program was established in 1946 under legislation introduced by late Senator J. William Fulbright of Arkansas and each year awards approximately 7,500 grants. The grants are for both American students who want to study abroad and foreign students who want to study in the US. To be eligible certain criteria must be met.
 

Comments on the decision from the SCOTUS Blog:
BB

This is an update from Dr. Orly Taitz, on the Supreme Court decision handed down on the lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility case on Tuesday, February 19, 2013.


My conversation with Mr. Dennison from SCOTUS blog

I talked to Mr. Dennison, writer of the SCOTUS blog. I called his cell number 301-512-4731.

He was correct in stating that SCOTUS only denied the STAY as Obama was already sworn in, SCOTUS never commented on the merits of the case, never stated that Obama’s papers are valid.

I asked, why did they sent 5 packets back. He said that they only need the decision of 4 justices to go to the next stage of oral argument. I responded that this looks even more corrupt and treasonous, it means that they sent the remaining packets to 4 liberal justices and 5 conservative justices never saw the papers. He stated that if I feel that the high treason was committed, I should file a complaint with the Justice department. I responded that the Justice department is complicit. I forwarded all the info to Holder and he never responded. I told him that in NAZI Germany they also had a Justice Department, Supreme Court, Parliament and judges, none of whom found one single action by Adolf Hitler to be unconstitutional and that is what we have now in the U.S. He said that he knows, that he is old enough to know what happened in Germany, but he can’t talk further.

 

To do your own searches:
Here is the actual Supreme Court Docket:
[TABLE="width: 100%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 20%"]No. 12A606
[/TD]
[TD="align: left"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Title:
[/TD]
[TD]
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Docketed:
[/TD]
[TD]December 13, 2012[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lower Ct:
[/TD]
[TD]Supreme Court of California[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 100%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 20%"] Case Nos.:[/TD]
[TD="align: left"](S207078)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

[TABLE="width: 100%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]~~~Date~~~ [/TD]
[TD]~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dec 11 2012[/TD]
[TD]Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy. [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dec 13 2012[/TD]
[TD]Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy. [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dec 26 2012[/TD]
[TD]Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice. [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jan 9 2013[/TD]
[TD]DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jan 9 2013[/TD]
[TD]Application (12A606) referred to the Court. [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Feb 19 2013[/TD]
[TD]Application (12A606) denied by the Court. [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Search - Supreme Court of the United States

Home - Supreme Court of the United States
Update Orly Taitz Noonan Case: U.S. Supreme Court Denies Only To Hear Does Not Decide Merits Of Case! « Political Vel Craft

All you have to do is a bit of research. It's all out there.
BB
 

Makes you wonder why the Supreme court will not even consider whether a sitting president is even a legal president. It does not matter if the crime occurred before or after they took office illegally, illegal is illegal....
 

I can't believe people like You. You will get the government you deserve. Enjoy it.
BB

People like who? No stereotpyes or assumptions in that statement... What, pray tell, does JerseyBen deserve? You are very good at attacking people. Perhaps a lesson in how to be polite would serve you well.

Crispin
 

Makes you wonder why the Supreme court will not even consider whether a sitting president is even a legal president. It does not matter if the crime occurred before or after they took office illegally, illegal is illegal....

Because most reasonable people have looked at the evidence in the case and have decided that it is BS. There is more evidence that McCain was ineligible to be President than Obama. This is a red herring thought up by the extreme right wing as a way to deflect their own horror at having lost the two elections.
 

People like who? No stereotpyes or assumptions in that statement... What, pray tell, does JerseyBen deserve? You are very good at attacking people. Perhaps a lesson in how to be polite would serve you well.

Crispin

Crisp you are now on my list too. Thanks for showing your true colors. :)
BB
 

Last edited by a moderator:
Because most reasonable people have looked at the evidence in the case and have decided that it is BS. There is more evidence that McCain was ineligible to be President than Obama. This is a red herring thought up by the extreme right wing as a way to deflect their own horror at having lost the two elections.

I'm on a roll! Pooh you're out-a-here too. And take your horse with you.. :)
BB
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom