lokiblossom
Bronze Member
Charlie, you have always struck me as a clever fellow. Surely, you can't consider this student's paper as legitimate "background".
It could well serve as an example of how to pose a one-sided argument with all the usual suspects; only interviewing those who strongly support your position, cherry-picking opposing statements, omitting facts that don't support you, presenting speculation and opinion as fact, etc.
Charlie is what we call in the trade a sniper. He makes a fairly good argument, but then after a few discussions backs off. Vanessa Smith's paper is a good example. Charlie if you are reading this start a thread on Smith's report and lets argue the points.
Cheers, Loki