Tektites?

1)I would risk assuming that the first two stones in your photo are the same stones as in my first post and these are the same as the long stones. The ones that are light inside, the ones that I called silt. And they do not look like this stone of mine, which I compare with your photo of indochinite.
It's very interesting to see what's inside those first two stones from your last photo.

2)and the stone that I compare with the photo from the wiki about Darwin glass - to me it is sooooo similar.
 

the bottom stone in this group of photos has a similarity in shape to your first two stones from the last photo. and my stones are all the same. and this is the group of the first post and the long ones.
but on my face these pits are less pronounced and smoother..
 

Attachments

  • 80.jpg
    80.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 2
  • 81.jpg
    81.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 2
  • 82.jpg
    82.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 2
maybe this is not correct BUT IT IS REALLY USEFUL, it seems to me, for understanding tektites... specifically about tunnels and about the sizes of pits and about triangular tunnels...


oh. the shapes here are interesting too..
 

Attachments

  • 61bb37f2-d6e0-4e4b-8981-8874fd6d0dbf.jpg
    61bb37f2-d6e0-4e4b-8981-8874fd6d0dbf.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 2
  • c45319e5-e62c-47c7-8532-95905406f889.jpg
    c45319e5-e62c-47c7-8532-95905406f889.jpg
    127.2 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:

Red-Coat,​

and here is also a straw - an oval stone, with holes from bubbles, convex on all sides, except for one side - as for me - the front one. and there is a dent there.
 

Attachments

  • cc462467-61e2-46ec-856a-ad5680acf67d.jpg
    cc462467-61e2-46ec-856a-ad5680acf67d.jpg
    113 KB · Views: 2
  • 92.jpg
    92.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 2
  • 91.jpg
    91.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 2
  • 94.jpg
    94.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 2
  • 93.jpg
    93.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 2
  • 90.jpg
    90.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 2
  • 95.jpg
    95.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 2

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top