Star Chart & Keys Cipher reveals the location of Biblical Treasures of the Knights Templar

Well since you said so it must be true. But there are like a dozen books that say, No you are wrong. Lets just list 1. Scott Clarke who has written more than one. So now that your imaginary problem is solved whats next?
Nullius in Verba translates to "take no one's word for it". Heed the warning. This is the motto of the British Royal Society (the first Western scientific body). When people allege new fun sounding things that try and make myths real, they are inventing out of need for the detail to market a new and much less improved interpretation of history, and you should run for the exists, because that is not we improve our understanding of anything. There is one career mystery/intrigue writer that I like to finger who has produced in excess of half a dozen books giving us the solution to the OI mystery over 4 decades, each time with a different treasure and more of the same history changing fabrication. The possibility of finding someone who will accept the most recent suggestion without ever diving deeply into it is all that is required for someone to make a living as a writer of this genre.

There is a sort of morality tale attached to OI, for sure. Thales of Miletus was the first Great Sage according to the Greeks. He is the one who is given credit with introducing Geometry to the Greeks from Egypt. Whether or not that is true is unknowable, but it is true that many men, Freemasons included, have taken to repeating this detail. Thales it credited for putting an end to the golden age of myths/ mythological storytelling. His approach was the first truly "scientific" approach. For that he is regarded as the father of empiricism and atomism. He is most famous for his foundational mathematical theorem called Thales theorem (the first mathematical proof). It is found in Euclid's work, Elements, as his 31st proposition. What Morris was doing when he planned at Shoreham/OI is right out of the Freemasonic tradition of honoring Thales. To Freemasons, Pythagoras and Thales are considered brothers (symbolic). The emphasis with geometry is on the reasoned approach to explaining the world and our place in it. For those who turn to OI and try and use religion and myth to account for it there is an accompanying story there to serve them. Those who dig, chase the details they recognize/see as belonging to Enoch's fabled shaft and vault. They smell the Ark. This bit of Hebrew fiction is itself an old morality tale. It came with the warning that those who would dig for it would see the shaft flood when approaching the vault. Attempts to drain the shaft would only ever cause the vault to collapse into the abyss. The contents of Enoch's fabled vault are unattainable, yet we have maroons who still insist that all of this is documented history proven today by mounting ever clever sounding "scientificky" claims that should inspire us to trust myths. It is not to be believed. With Thales you are to break free from the myths and the lure of religious treasures that promise knowledge.

Thales allows us to get our bearings in a very reliable way. As a navigator you should aim to seize the empiric detail. The stone triangle pointer points to N. To find N, this is Thales' method: look to what we call the Big Dipper (he is the credited discoverer of this constellation in Antiquity) and project from the edge of the bowl to the star Polaris. That is your center of certainty in the Universe (for the time being). It all revolves around Polaris and the constance of the Christian cross for those earliest Western scientific minds who gave us the modern scientific age (it was in fact only a revival which followed the error full ways of the Christian age ).

Give Thales a read. He influenced a lot of modern thinking. His "arche", or primal substance was water. In myth that comes from the primordial well which belonged to Enki in the Sumerian myths. Enki was symbolized by the number 40. Water to Thales was a principle in a time before we knew what the elements really were. There is a lot to learn if you are up to not inventing.
 

Nullius in Verba translates to "take no one's word for it". Heed the warning. This is the motto of the British Royal Society (the first Western scientific body). When people allege new fun sounding things that try and make myths real, they are inventing out of need for the detail to market a new and much less improved interpretation of history, and you should run for the exists, because that is not we improve our understanding of anything. There is one career mystery/intrigue writer that I like to finger who has produced in excess of half a dozen books giving us the solution to the OI mystery over 4 decades, each time with a different treasure and more of the same history changing fabrication. The possibility of finding someone who will accept the most recent suggestion without ever diving deeply into it is all that is required for someone to make a living as a writer of this genre.

There is a sort of morality tale attached to OI, for sure. Thales of Miletus was the first Great Sage according to the Greeks. He is the one who is given credit with introducing Geometry to the Greeks from Egypt. Whether or not that is true is unknowable, but it is true that many men, Freemasons included, have taken to repeating this detail. Thales it credited for putting an end to the golden age of myths/ mythological storytelling. His approach was the first truly "scientific" approach. For that he is regarded as the father of empiricism and atomism. He is most famous for his foundational mathematical theorem called Thales theorem (the first mathematical proof). It is found in Euclid's work, Elements, as his 31st proposition. What Morris was doing when he planned at Shoreham/OI is right out of the Freemasonic tradition of honoring Thales. To Freemasons, Pythagoras and Thales are considered brothers (symbolic). The emphasis with geometry is on the reasoned approach to explaining the world and our place in it. For those who turn to OI and try and use religion and myth to account for it there is an accompanying story there to serve them. Those who dig, chase the details they recognize/see as belonging to Enoch's fabled shaft and vault. They smell the Ark. This bit of Hebrew fiction is itself an old morality tale. It came with the warning that those who would dig for it would see the shaft flood when approaching the vault. Attempts to drain the shaft would only ever cause the vault to collapse into the abyss. The contents of Enoch's fabled vault are unattainable, yet we have maroons who still insist that all of this is documented history proven today by mounting ever clever sounding "scientificky" claims that should inspire us to trust myths. It is not to be believed. With Thales you are to break free from the myths and the lure of religious treasures that promise knowledge.

Thales allows us to get our bearings in a very reliable way. As a navigator you should aim to seize the empiric detail. The stone triangle pointer points to N. To find N, this is Thales' method: look to what we call the Big Dipper (he is the credited discoverer of this constellation in Antiquity) and project from the edge of the bowl to the star Polaris. That is your center of certainty in the Universe (for the time being). It all revolves around Polaris and the constance of the Christian cross for those earliest Western scientific minds who gave us the modern scientific age (it was in fact only a revival which followed the error full ways of the Christian age ).

Give Thales a read. He influenced a lot of modern thinking. His "arche", or primal substance was water. In myth that comes from the primordial well which belonged to Enki in the Sumerian myths. Enki was symbolized by the number 40. Water to Thales was a principle in a time before we knew what the elements really were. There is a lot to learn if you are up to not inventing.
Prosaic but impotent. The stone Triangle is a complex data cache. It is 10 feet wide. Bifurcated at 6' and 4'. On the four foot side there are 3 horizontal stones over 3 horizontal stones. Using the decimal system this is 33. On the six foot side there are 5 horizontal stones over 5 horizontal stones giving 55.

These numbers are moved to the top triangle above their location. If it is assumed that there are 90 degree angles in each we get 33, 57 & 90 then on the right 35, 55 & 90.

The apex angle (33&35) give 68 degrees. The base angles added equal the exterior angle. 57+90=147 and 55+90=145. These angles combined are 292.

Quick review: The cross is 867, 720, 429,360,293 & 145. A few more but this is enough. The Stone Triangle is a 3 sided Pyramid with 720 internal angles. The first exterior 147 when added is 147+720=867. Therefore, the Pyramid verifies the integrity of the Cross and provides angles to triangulate to depths.

That is just the error correction built into the cipher. In the axis 2 courses are set. 145 and 136. Seting out from ALDEBARAN it connects 3 stars. The 13th Brightest and the 13th star of Taurus then the 14th star. It reveals 2 chambers offset and accessible via a ramp.

Christ dies at 33. The ramp is at 33 degrees to a depth of 233' this is triangulated with segments 429 & 360 with angles 33, 57 & 90. Please note this process is familiar to almost everyone, redundant and repeatable.

In the Crossbar we get Length minus width (Crossbar) is 147. The Crossbar has 180 degrees just like triangles in the Pyramid. When 180 has 147 removed the results are 33,

My point is there are no fairy tales like in your story. Math and Navigation. BTW the Pyramids north pointing angle is 292 and that means 'King of Kings'. The pyramid tells stories in Kabbalah. It sits atop the deposits and there is a Masonic device that reveals the relationship. Also the hand on the left points down and its and exact match as a template.

The Pyramid is is in fact pointing down. The reason the tresure isnt found is that it isnt on the island. Its just next to it which is why a ramp is needed. You seem to be believing in stories told on the internet & TV. I did th math.
 

Attachments

  • ADLER'S PYRAMID.jpg
    ADLER'S PYRAMID.jpg
    292.1 KB · Views: 3
  • 430200753_10232546192503464_6050036115866490986_n.jpg
    430200753_10232546192503464_6050036115866490986_n.jpg
    417.8 KB · Views: 3
Prosaic but impotent. The stone Triangle is a complex data cache. It is 10 feet wide. Bifurcated at 6' and 4'. On the four foot side there are 3 horizontal stones over 3 horizontal stones. Using the decimal system this is 33. On the six foot side there are 5 horizontal stones over 5 horizontal stones giving 55.

These numbers are moved to the top triangle above their location. If it is assumed that there are 90 degree angles in each we get 33, 57 & 90 then on the right 35, 55 & 90.

The apex angle (33&35) give 68 degrees. The base angles added equal the exterior angle. 57+90=147 and 55+90=145. These angles combined are 292.

Quick review: The cross is 867, 720, 429,360,293 & 145. A few more but this is enough. The Stone Triangle is a 3 sided Pyramid with 720 internal angles. The first exterior 147 when added is 147+720=867. Therefore, the Pyramid verifies the integrity of the Cross and provides angles to triangulate to depths.

That is just the error correction built into the cipher. In the axis 2 courses are set. 145 and 136. Seting out from ALDEBARAN it connects 3 stars. The 13th Brightest and the 13th star of Taurus then the 14th star. It reveals 2 chambers offset and accessible via a ramp.

Christ dies at 33. The ramp is at 33 degrees to a depth of 233' this is triangulated with segments 429 & 360 with angles 33, 57 & 90. Please note this process is familiar to almost everyone, redundant and repeatable.

In the Crossbar we get Length minus width (Crossbar) is 147. The Crossbar has 180 degrees just like triangles in the Pyramid. When 180 has 147 removed the results are 33,

My point is there are no fairy tales like in your story. Math and Navigation. BTW the Pyramids north pointing angle is 292 and that means 'King of Kings'. The pyramid tells stories in Kabbalah. It sits atop the deposits and there is a Masonic device that reveals the relationship. Also the hand on the left points down and its and exact match as a template.

The Pyramid is is in fact pointing down. The reason the tresure isnt found is that it isnt on the island. Its just next to it which is why a ramp is needed. You seem to be believing in stories told on the internet & TV. I did th math.
You did your math? Since when is 5 stones here and five stones there=55? That's not math. That's a symbolic association that is being made. 33 is a symbol of the "mystery of mysteries" from the Hermetic and Chaldean tradition. Christ dies at 33 in the story to emulate the numerology, not the other way around. Your doing the same thing John Dee was doing by trying to Christianize what isn't Christian (all of geometry). You are seeing a numerological suggestion and tracing back to Christianized ideas which you then attribute to the Knights Templar, as if these people were empiricists like Thales, Pythagoras or Archimedes.

Since you do like doing math and finding parallels in it to real world things, consider this.
monas cross.jpg

Very similarly to what I showed you about Nolan's Cross coming from one specific Thales' Theorem demonstration, you can see that the same thing can be constructed using John Dee's Monas Hieroglyphic as a framework. The rectangle in red is the 8x5 suggestion. If point F is pushed out and additional 4 feet to 292 that becomes a proportion of Phi instead of 1.6. As I've mentioned before, the thing hinges on the number 40. The polygon that contains the Monad in Dee's creation is the Nonagon (9 sided polygon) The 9 apex points divide the circle's 360 degrees by 40 degree hard angles.

The logical thing to do here is to ask what is informing what. What is the basis for all this? For Dee it is not anything but Euclid. Euclid is being used to build a "hieroglyph" with recognizable symbolic properties that are clearly not Christian, and they are being blended with the idea of God as a geometer. In his Monas Hieroglyphica he details carefully how to construct it. It is 9 divisions in height. Emphasis on the esoteric meaning of 9 is central. The money pit invention was 9 levels in such a way that 30 are above water and 60 are below. That is the 3-6-9 esoterically informed idea that others have also strived to play with (most famously Tesla and his vortex maths). The vault 153 feet represent the number of digital root=9. All numbers that are iterations of 1-5-3 are divisible by 3. 153 is the basis for the music he tritone in the chord (tonic, third and fifth). The tonic is repeated in the octave. This means it can be rewritten as 3,5,8. These are three successive Fibonacci numbers. The ration of any two successive ones is an approximation of Phi. 8/5=1.6. That's the aspect ration of the 5x8 cross which is seen above at celestial declination 40N in the Northern Cross asterism.

Some of the empirical stuff that is suggested on OI we can trace to no earlier 1563. It's why can be quite certain that anyone suggesting Knights Templar involvement is fooling themselves by associating what is being given to us by Freemasonic storytellers who are motivated by role playing the modern Christian Knight in their spare time.

You seem to be discovering that the Biblical numerology comes from elsewhere. That's not a bad thing to realize. The Christian narrative is very much like the OI story. It's an allegory that exploits Hellenistic era geometric ideas that were previously found in Greek mystery cults of number. Kepler perhaps said it best when he described the two great treasures that were discovered--the Pythagorean theorem and the Golden ratio. He called them Gold and Silver. At OI there is a treasure of gold and silver to be discovered, but Rick is too impressed by Zena to and pseudo alternate histories to be bothered.
 

You and people like you are why the treasure cannot be found. This is beyond your comprehension. So, your machinations do not explain anything. Least of all located the treasure. Kindly take your mumbo jumbo BS and cram it someplace dark.

It appears to me that SSR is quite equally educated on the subject, and currently has you on the ropes.

Your best, educated response is to insult him?

Please explain why his interpretations are wrong.
ora.gif
 

You and people like you are why the treasure cannot be found. This is beyond your comprehension. So, your machinations do not explain anything. Least of all located the treasure. Kindly take your mumbo jumbo BS and cram it someplace dark.
You' ll find the treasure in Euclid's elements. Thales Theorem which gives rise to the Pythagorean theorem is proposition number 31. If it Freemasonic books you'd rather get you hands on then you may be looking for a copy of Anderson's charges which was in the possession of Erasmus James Philipps when came to NS. The one he gave to his Lodge burned. His own copy is unaccounted for. Maybe Rick shredded it, lol. At Mahone Bay, NS, you are near a symbolic ground zero for Freemasonry in NA. At least that is what Dee had informed Gilbert about by teaching him about Geo-metry (measuring of the globe) in symbolic, yet empiric, fashion. It might please you that the people in question are the forerunners of Free and Accepted Lodges in London. Their "brothers" will act as modern Knights Templar.
 

You and people like you are why the treasure cannot be found. This is beyond your comprehension. So, your machinations do not explain anything. Least of all located the treasure. Kindly take your mumbo jumbo BS and cram it someplace dark.
One more post like this and you will lose your ability to post for awhile !
 

It appears to me that SSR is quite equally educated on the subject, and currently has you on the ropes.

Your best, educated response is to insult him?

Please explain why his interpretations are wrong. View attachment 2186740
His purpose is to make nice pictures and weak associations. His little pictures and measurements explain nothing whereas my post is math.

He doesnt have me on the ropes he's not even in my class. Hey how can I block him?
 

His purpose is to make nice pictures and weak associations. His little pictures and measurements explain nothing whereas my post is math.

He doesnt have me on the ropes he's not even in my class. Hey how can I block him?
PS read the new post it walks the reader through much of the cipher with pictures.
 

I can appreciate that. He has an agenda that my posts disprove. Can he be blocked?
Simple, please follow our rules. You can click on a members avatar on left of their post and then hit "ignore".

I have seen nothing that proves anything one way or another.
 

Simple, please follow our rules. You can click on a members avatar on left of their post and then hit "ignore".

I have seen nothing that proves anything one way or another.
Did you have a question? Some people see it some do not. This is the nature of the cipher. Its largely made to be understood by ships captains with some knowledge of lore. I feel this image contains enough information to understand the basics. In Triangle #1 we are given the apex angle which is at ground level. The ramp starts there. In the second triangle the base angle is given and when the numbers are decimated (Move decimal one space to the left.) the second chamber is reached from the first. This is brilliant. They triangulated the depth from the surface and provided data to approach the second chamber from below. When one understands the numerous non-coincidental aspects its very compelling. The other guy has has a squiggly solution that isnt repeatable nor does it answer the questions who what when and where. (1325 is perhaps when.)
 

Did you have a question? Some people see it some do not. This is the nature of the cipher. Its largely made to be understood by ships captains with some knowledge of lore. I feel this image contains enough information to understand the basics. In Triangle #1 we are given the apex angle which is at ground level. The ramp starts there. In the second triangle the base angle is given and when the numbers are decimated (Move decimal one space to the left.) the second chamber is reached from the first. This is brilliant. They triangulated the depth from the surface and provided data to approach the second chamber from below. When one understands the numerous non-coincidental aspects its very compelling. The other guy has has a squiggly solution that isnt repeatable nor does it answer the questions who what when and where. (1325 is perhaps when.)
Proof is in the pudding, it is only one more case of speculation unless you can produce hard physical proof.
 

Proof is in the pudding, it is only one more case of speculation unless you can produce hard physical proof.
That can only be done b y the owners. I am 2200 miles away in another country. I am in touch with leads on the project and they will prove it with hard evidence.

As for this is like everything else is completely inaccurate. This is completely different than Pharoe, Admunsen Clarke, Wolter and every other theorist, To be trebley redundant this is math not supposition and speculation. Redundant and repeatable. Best understood by a submarine captain.
 

That can only be done b y the owners. I am 2200 miles away in another country. I am in touch with leads on the project and they will prove it with hard evidence.

As for this is like everything else is completely inaccurate. This is completely different than Pharoe, Admunsen Clarke, Wolter and every other theorist, To be trebley redundant this is math not supposition and speculation. Redundant and repeatable. Best understood by a submarine captain.
As stated earlier, unproven speculation.
 

That can only be done b y the owners. I am 2200 miles away in another country. I am in touch with leads on the project and they will prove it with hard evidence.

As for this is like everything else is completely inaccurate. This is completely different than Pharoe, Admunsen Clarke, Wolter and every other theorist, To be trebley redundant this is math not supposition and speculation. Redundant and repeatable. Best understood by a submarine captain.
As stated earlier, unproven speculation.
So your a bottom line guy. Nothing in the middle matters. This isnt for you. Check back after its over.
It is still unproven speculation.
 

That can only be done b y the owners. I am 2200 miles away in another country. I am in touch with leads on the project and they will prove it with hard evidence.

As for this is like everything else is completely inaccurate. This is completely different than Pharoe, Admunsen Clarke, Wolter and every other theorist, To be trebley redundant this is math not supposition and speculation. Redundant and repeatable. Best understood by a submarine captain.
As stated earlier, unproven speculation.
So your a bottom line guy. Nothing in the middle matters. This isnt for you. Check back after its over.
It is still unproven speculation.
 

So was E=MC2. You either get it or not.
That is NOT speculation.... That has been proven over and over now. It's called a fact now...!

So now you agree that until proven your idea is speculation just like E=MC2 was...? If not why is yours any different than Einstein's? And ol' Albert was a genius...!!!!

I totally agree with Treasure_Hunter.... speculation. What else can it be?
 

SA, until a treasure is produced, any opinion, scientific theory or proposed solution is still nothing more than a theory, aka" speculation.

Now, you may have backed up your theory with some data you presume is accurate, but again, until there is actual treasure in hand it's still just a theory.

Einstein's theory of gravitational lensing, while brilliant, was not accepted as fact until British astronomers Arthur Stanley Eddington, Frank Watson Dyson, and Andrew Crommelin proved Einstein's theory correct in 1919.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top