Roman Metal Working Site - Day 5 - Nice ROMAN SILVER...

CRUSADER

Gold Member
May 25, 2007
41,005
46,296
ENGLAND
🥇 Banner finds
27
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
XP Deus II v0.6 with 11" Coil
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Cru'dad & I continued on with gridding the site which is still on cultivated land. They must be due to drill it this week, so time is limited. We spend 5 hours digging & just when I had given up hope for a good Roman Silver, after all the low grade debased ones we have had recently - BAM - Got one!8-) It's about as early as we normally get, other than the odd rare BC one.

Pictured today's metal working pieces to show evidence of the Site's name.:thumbsup:
Jetton
34 Scrappies
2 broken Fibula
1 Roman Ring Frag.
1st C AD T Shaped Fibula (First of its type for the collection):icon_thumright:
Silver Denarius of Vespasian circa 69AD. :coffee2:
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    169 KB · Views: 121
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    148.1 KB · Views: 111
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    272 KB · Views: 108
  • 4.JPG
    4.JPG
    89.5 KB · Views: 113
  • 5.JPG
    5.JPG
    118.8 KB · Views: 99
  • 6.JPG
    6.JPG
    62.1 KB · Views: 96
  • 7.JPG
    7.JPG
    66.9 KB · Views: 99
Last edited:
Upvote 25
Great specimen ! You've found a few of these over the years haven't you ? What is the larger bronze coin with the Chi Rho symbol ?
 

Last edited:
Very nice decorated fibula, I haven't seen one like that before. Congrats on the appealing Vespasian, debased coins don't hold up as well as those nice high purity silvers, glad you managed to snag it.
 

Nice fibula! Looks like there are way more types than the ones in the books. Local fashion may be a reason. Like the Denarius too. Very little wear! :icon_thumright:
To me the basic design looks like a 1st C. roman variant of the celtic bow fibula exept of the knob. If not it should be a late one for your area. What do you think?
 

Last edited:
Nice fibula! Looks like there are way more types than the ones in the books. Local fashion may be a reason. Like the Denarius too. Very little wear! :icon_thumright:
It is in the book, just not one I have see before, until I looked hard for it.
 

I love looking at your posts! :icon_thumleft:
 

No less than miraculous, as usual! I'm saying banner!
 

That Vespasian is really nice. Looks pretty thick. What's the approx. diameter?
 

Nothing less than amazing I love reading your posts and finds Thanks
 

That Vespasian is really nice. Looks pretty thick. What's the approx. diameter?

These earlier ones were thicker, especially at the head/bust part of the coin.

Dia - 17mm at smallest, 21mm at widest.
 

Last edited:
Nice fibula! Looks like there are way more types than the ones in the books. Local fashion may be a reason. Like the Denarius too. Very little wear! :icon_thumright:
To me the basic design looks like a 1st C. roman variant of the celtic bow fibula exept of the knob. If not it should be a late one for your area. What do you think?
It's in Hattatt's, the exact type, other than the top hole is not filled (& mine is missing a small toe section where the rest of the catch-plate was). They call them the 'enameled T Shaped Fibula 1st - 2nd C AD'.
 

No less than miraculous, as usual! I'm saying banner!
Thanks but this is a 'relatively' common coin. (Not saying common find) The recent 16th C Gold Ring was probably the closest I've come this year. IMO
 

Nice silver :thumbsup: the brooch is a head stud brooch probably had enamaling inlay at one point.:thumbsup:

SS
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top