Random Double-Blind Tests for LRLs

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

It would, indeed, help if you would make a final "conclusion sentence" at the end of a post or paragraph like that, which totally states the point you are trying to make. Without that, it leaves a lot of guesswork on the reader's part. Just a suggestion.

Double does not mean one
Blind does not mean blind or blind folded
If one person is tested it will prove nothing..Just that one person can or can not use his tool
The Scientific community will not except that kind of test...
Is that clear enough...Art

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

~EE~

It would, indeed, help if you would make a final "conclusion sentence" at the end of a post or paragraph like that, which totally states the point you are trying to make. Without that, it leaves a lot of guesswork on the reader's part. Just a suggestion.

Double does not mean one
Blind does not mean blind or blind folded
If one person is tested it will prove nothing..Just that one person can or can not use his tool
The Scientific community will not except that kind of test...
Is that clear enough...Art

The "double" in double-blind does not refer to the number of people tested, but rather to who is "held blind" regarding data about the unknown item in the test. With LRLs, it would refer to the hidden target being the unknown item, and the LRL operator and the administrator both being "kept in the dark" about where the target is hidden.

In a "single-blind" test, the operator would not know where the target is, but the administrator would know.

In a single-blind food or drug test, the test subject would not know what it is he is tasting or being given. In a double-blind food or drug test, the administrator would also not know.

That's why the term is "double-blind," and not "double-people."

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE THr~

The "double" in double-blind does not refer to the number of people tested, but rather to who is "held blind" regarding data about the unknown item in the test. With LRLs, it would refer to the hidden target being the unknown item, and the LRL operator and the administrator both being "kept in the dark" about where the target is hidden.

That's why the term is "double-blind," and not "double-people."

Thank you but I guess that t-net members can read the definitions..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE THr~

The "double" in double-blind does not refer to the number of people tested, but rather to who is "held blind" regarding data about the unknown item in the test. With LRLs, it would refer to the hidden target being the unknown item, and the LRL operator and the administrator both being "kept in the dark" about where the target is hidden.

That's why the term is "double-blind," and not "double-people."

Thank you but I guess that t-net members can read the definitions..Art

I totally agree!

Merry Christmas!