ivan salis
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2007
- 16,794
- 3,810
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- delta 4000 / ace 250 - used BH and many others too
why is that people say the civil war was about "freeing the slaves" --- if so since the war started in 1861 why was it almost 2 years before the "slaves" were declared free?-- why does no one speak of when president lincoln on may 22nd of 1862 recinded union gen david hunters --general order #11 which was issued on by hunter on may 8th of 1862 which "freed" all the slaves in --south carolina, georgia and florida * forever more --the 3 states were under gen hunters military command at the time --
why is this historic "fact" never spoken of by main stream news ? or in history classes? -- only later on in 1863 after several very large and manpower costly battles did lincoln relent and "free the slaves" - to disrupt the south's farming systems - and make the slaves finally care --who won the war-- so the slaves ran to join the union army so as to be "free" crippling the souths food production and gaining "troops" for the north at the same time.
of course slavery was wrong and evil --and the civil war thru what occured "freed" the slaves in the end -- but it was not why the war started in the beginning --cotton crops worked by the slaves provided most of the US govt tax base -- however the northern states held the "political" power to say how the taxes were to be spent --since the north had more states --they had control of the senate --as well as more of the "population" as well --so they controlled the house as well -- with lincoln in place --there was nothing the south could do to but split away --since the north wanted to block more " slave" states from coming into existance (so they would always retain the "upper hand" politically)--to stop the raise of southern polotical power with their new found wealth.
why is this historic "fact" never spoken of by main stream news ? or in history classes? -- only later on in 1863 after several very large and manpower costly battles did lincoln relent and "free the slaves" - to disrupt the south's farming systems - and make the slaves finally care --who won the war-- so the slaves ran to join the union army so as to be "free" crippling the souths food production and gaining "troops" for the north at the same time.
of course slavery was wrong and evil --and the civil war thru what occured "freed" the slaves in the end -- but it was not why the war started in the beginning --cotton crops worked by the slaves provided most of the US govt tax base -- however the northern states held the "political" power to say how the taxes were to be spent --since the north had more states --they had control of the senate --as well as more of the "population" as well --so they controlled the house as well -- with lincoln in place --there was nothing the south could do to but split away --since the north wanted to block more " slave" states from coming into existance (so they would always retain the "upper hand" politically)--to stop the raise of southern polotical power with their new found wealth.