Native Floridian
Bronze Member
- Mar 12, 2012
- 1,211
- 486
- Detector(s) used
- Excal, Sov GT
- Primary Interest:
- Beach & Shallow Water Hunting
So, we are going to purposely dumb down our children because God is a scary word, just like the "N" word?? Maybe he could have said "under G" instead. You guys are missing the point just to jump in front of ol' dumbo to take another bullet for him. IF, I say "IF" it is widely accepted that Lincoln said "under God" in the address, shouldn't THAT be the version passed down? Say your little students aren't supposed to hear about death or wanting to die. C'mon, hear me out. Now, you are going to teach the little lambs a little about history. You are now going to tell them about Patrick Henry saying "Give me liberty or give me death". Shall we change that to "Give me liberty or give me a time out"? Same thing, whether it's God or anything else, don't change real history to fit an AGENDA.
We are not dumbing down our children. The issue of religion in public schools, is for the most part a local issue. Each district handles it in the way they see fit. Rules regulating religious activities, celebrations etc are all covered by each district according to the standards employed by that district.
For example, in the Bible belt you aren't going to get much opposition in a small school district to a teacher reading a verse from the Bible to make some point. Everyone is of like mind. Most of the kids are the same religion. All are Christian. Try that in New York city and the teacher will lose their job. Why? because not all are Christian. Some may not believe in God at all. The parents of the non Christian children choose a public school so that their children would not be subjected to religious ideology. That right to an education free from religious content is violated at the mere mention of God. they argue that if the religious content comes from a teacher it becomes coercive in nature because of the position of respect the teacher holds over the student. This is where the big lawsuits are born.
The broader point is that in many districts there are strict anti religion policies in effect to protect the rights of a diverse community of beliefs. The version of the address obama read is an accepted version of the address and allows it's use in these schools. Schools that could face expensive legal action should they chose to the Under God version.
The sad fact is there are school districts that have been saddled with six figure legal bills over Christmas displays. Who can afford that?
Last edited: