Wonder what the bottom is like on this site? Would an anchor drag through the site on a windy day! Possible THer's boat convention on the site in the future. Would the piece of the monument get caught in an anchor?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read the judgement. There is no reasonable logic that avoids the conclusion it is La Trinite.
I would if you can provide a link to the Judgement. I have searched and searched but other than the previous rulings, I can find nothing other than news and info postings.
Huntsman you can view the court document for free here: https://www.scribd.com/document/372...60149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate
No, that is the State of Florida's motion from February. This motion was terminated without decision when the case was closed, so is moot (though it might indicate likely Florida State arguments should similar cases come up in the future).
To the best of my knowledge, the judgement is not available for free download. I paid, because I wanted to understand the detailed basis for the outcome.
The Court Judgement if not ordered kept private or sealed, should be available for free to the Media and the Public per the "Public Information Act".
The story of the monument does not make sense. The spanish took it down to send it back to France? proof? My guess is that it was probably taken down during the quasi war 1798 1800 and dumped at sea as a gesture of ill feelings and bally-hoo of the french at the time, probably by some local ship captain. Why would anyone go to the trouble of "packing up a monument just to send it back to France"? Just a plain column with a coat of arms. Why not just dig a hole and push it over into it? or take a chisel to it and reuse the stone?
Value? Maybe some historical value/significance to the city that had it in the first place. It probably wouldn't take much for recovery, couple of well placed air bags.
was it found in wreckage or just by itself.
It makes good sense for a French territorial marker to be on board a French royal ship on a colonial mission. It is a shipwreck. There are French bronze cannon of mid-16th century date at the same location and in clear association. A plethora of evidence suggests the wreck is, almost certainly, La Trinite, Ribault's flagship of 1565.
Based on the many theories, stories, some historical information and the fact that the Cannons found are not of the type that would be found on Ribault's Flagship, the La Trinité, it makes more sense that the Monument and the Cannons were captured when the Spanish conquered the French at Fort Caroline, loaded them onto a Spanish Galleon for transport to Spain but then the Galleon and it's cargo were lost either in a Hurricane or battle with a French Naval Vessel.
The cannon are of the right type. There is firsthand documentary evidence that stone territorial markers of this type were on board La Trinite. The location makes perfect sense. The spanish ship theory is just speculation. It's all summarised expertly in the judgement, which, rightly in my view, critiques attempts to oppose hard evidence with unsupported speculation. Naturally there is a small degree of doubt, as there almost always will be with early shipwrecks. Read the evidence, then decide what makes more sense.
I refuse to line another entity's pockets and pay for information that should be free, so there is no way for me to read the evidence.
That would mean the Spanish were using the stone pillar probably as Ballast?
uh oh
OK, so govt should get out of the way and stop interfering, then provide stuff for free when you need it. Hmmm.
Guess you'll either have to wait for it to pasted somewhere for free, or remain in ignorance. But until you've read the evidence you cannot reasonably speculate on other explanations.
PacerMonitor has nothing to do with the government. They are a private entity set up to provide easy access to court documents for Lawyers, Law Firms and the like to make it way for them to research cases and especially similar cases.
You complained that it should be freely available as a matter of law. That is, you demanded govt supply it for free. To the best of my knowledge it is not freely available as a download on the internet, so I paid the very modest fee ($5.50) to get a copy via PacerMonitor. You can do the same, or wait until there is a free download, or go to the court and ask for a copy (I'm assuming you can do this), or remain in ignorance.
Based on the many theories, stories, some historical information and the fact that the Cannons found are not of the type that would be found on Ribault's Flagship (i.e. they are apparently of the type used in Seacoast fortifications), the La Trinité, it makes more sense that the Monument and the Cannons were captured when the Spanish conquered the French at Fort Caroline, loaded them onto a Spanish Galleon for transport to Spain but then the Galleon and it's cargo were lost either in a Hurricane or battle with a French Naval Vessel.
It doesn't matter if it is a Spanish vessel or the La Trinite. What matters is what the state archies say it is.