Now That Someone Has Decoded The Beale Papers As OF Jan 2014

[franklin]

You must truly believe!

Quoting one post and giving a response to another post. I notice sometimes you post to your own post? You don't answer your own questions when you talk to yourself do you?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[masterpoe]

Now That Someone Has Decoded The Beale Papers As OF Jan 2014
Interesting claim Crypto/O.P.. Wrong however.
However they were solved 6 years earlier than 2014.

http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/beale-codes/103366-beale-codes-solved.html

I have seen all or most of the personal deciphering for the Beale Ciphers. The only one that stand out of the crowd is by the one you guys object to the most! What you have seen here on this site of it is just enough to bring you understanding that in fact it has been deciphered by him!

The members here shut there ear's and stomp their feet at mention of his name!

 

[releventchair]

Stands out of the "crowd".
Great. You agree there has been more than the O.P.'s position of only one solve.
Had he /she /it posted "Now that some one else has decoded the Beale papers as of 2014", that would be fine.
As opposed to the misleading title ,as if no one had previously solved them.

If one is going to prefer one solve over another ,so be it.
I don't object to claims. Just to false or misleading ones.
Proof would be nice. Ain't happened though.
So...wait for the next claim. There is always a next claim.

 

[franklin]

The decipherment posted by Icehouse, Legrand and company is about the same as Roy Dallas had on his website. Are you speaking of the decipherment by Icehouse and Legrand or the decipherment posted by Jean Laf which no one has seen unless they both are one and the same?

 

[Rebel - KGC]

The decipherment posted by Icehouse, Legrand and company is about the same as Roy Dallas had on his website. Are you speaking of the decipherment by Icehouse and Legrand or the decipherment posted by Jean Laf which no one has seen unless they both are one and the same?

COULD BE!

 

[masterpoe]

Stands out of the "crowd".
Great. You agree there has been more than the O.P.'s position of only one solve.
Had he /she /it posted "Now that some one else has decoded the Beale papers as of 2014", that would be fine.
As opposed to the misleading title ,as if no one had previously solved them.

If one is going to prefer one solve over another ,so be it.
I don't object to claims. Just to false or misleading ones.
Proof would be nice. Ain't happened though.
So...wait for the next claim. There is always a next claim.

So, is that your final answer?

 

[masterpoe]

The decipherment posted by Icehouse, Legrand and company is about the same as Roy Dallas had on his website. Are you speaking of the decipherment by Icehouse and Legrand or the decipherment posted by Jean Laf which no one has seen unless they both are one and the same?

I don't see how anyone of them have the same information given in these threads, but only one has given the details to us that are yet different then all the rest! I think ECS would agree!

 

[franklin]

I don't see how anyone of them have the same information given in these threads, but only one has given the details to us that are yet different then all the rest! I think ECS would agree!

There are more posters on these threads to get to agree with you other than ECS. I do not think ECS would ever agree with you. You and your worshipful code breaker have not posted anything of value.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

I don't see how anyone of them have the same information given in these threads, but only one has given the details to us that are yet different then all the rest! I think ECS would agree!

PROXY for ECS, eh...?

 

[masterpoe]

PROXY for ECS, eh...?

No, I'm not ECS! Even you must agree that what you have seen from Jean is more separate from the same old line as everyone else, right?

 

[releventchair]

So, is that your final answer?

To ...which question?

New developments currently going on will change many former "answers". A miss is as good as a mile where this one is concerned.

A check overrun ,then revisited; changes a course. For now. Whatever your question relates to, follow the money.....

 

[masterpoe]

To ...which question?

New developments currently going on will change many former "answers". A miss is as good as a mile where this one is concerned.

A check overrun ,then revisited; changes a course. For now. Whatever your question relates to, follow the money.....

The fact that he alone has moved in to a fuller understanding of the ciphers should tip you off, that this is not just someone rehashing the fake news of everyone else!

 

[franklin]

The fact that he alone has moved in to a fuller understanding of the ciphers should tip you off, that this is not just someone rehashing the fake news of everyone else!

If by "fuller understanding" meaning "full of himself" then you are most likely correct. Everything he has claimed as new found evidence, I can refute it and prove he is wrong. On his webpage is information he has taken from posters on this forum. He has not come up with anything other than claiming he has done something without any verifiable proof. Prove it and then show us how he has proved it.

 

[releventchair]

The fact that he alone has moved in to a fuller understanding of the ciphers should tip you off, that this is not just someone rehashing the fake news of everyone else!

Odd pose of a question...?
[The fact that he alone has moved in to a fuller understanding]...
Not sure what that means either. I ain't seen nothin come of it. Don't expect to either. He has or has not ,what matters that to anyone without defining results?
That's not for him to do. Not his purpose.

Howmmmnnnnn. Floaty feeling -inggingingingggg! Could be a breakthrough! Oh ,I understand him now....Fullerer.

 

[ECS]

There are more posters on these threads to get to agree with you other than ECS.
I do not think ECS would ever agree with you.
You and your worshipful code breaker have not posted anything of value.

That is correct, Franklin, for all that we have seen of this great codebreakers "solution" is that grand fret epitaph that has no bearing or meaning to the Beale narrative story as copyrighted and published by James Beverly Ward.

 

[ECS]

Since his BEALE CIPHER DECODED Facebook Page has open comments, posting a link would violate TN rules, but a search engine should get you there, M Poe.
Scroll down to Feb 23, 2017 where Laf posted our TN screen names and gave our real names, complained about a TN Moderator for giving him a time out for saying that I have "evil ways".
For someone that casts stones, he is very steadfast in his denials when his insults are brought into the light...

...and you seem to forget what your favorite codebreaker remarked about certain TN members on another site, including insults and even divulging actual names just because they question his claims of Beale cipher solution.

 

[ECS]

I was not aware of that Facebook Page until a fellow TN member poster brought it to my attention.
Also contains information clearly borrowed from the posts on these Beale threads.

This is one of many reasons why several of us really don't care about your promotion of Laf's solved Beale cipher claims, masterpoe.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

A PROXY in our midst, eh...?

 

[masterpoe]

...and you seem to forget what your favorite codebreaker remarked about certain TN members on another site, including insults and even divulging actual names just because they question his claims of Beale cipher solution.

It's hard to hide your name from anyone these days! Especially on Facebook!

 

[masterpoe]

This is one of many reasons why several of us really don't care about your promotion of Laf's solved Beale cipher claims, masterpoe.

Heh!