seekeroforo
Jr. Member
- Thread starter
- #41
In red:
Outline of some shapes? You compare to your knowledge?
In green:
Cross?
Outline of some shapes? You compare to your knowledge?
In green:
Cross?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shortstack said:Hey, Smee:
Did the people who ate that bark make those extraordinary markers and monuments? Just curious. That's an interesting hand holding the heart between it's thumb and foreknuckle.
Shortstack said:Smee:
The main reason I outlined a hand holding that one heart between the thumb and forenuckle is because of that well defined thumb. It has a thumb nail and the crease in the first joint. If you'd like to see some excellent examples of 3-D hand carvings, look at the photos posted by Desertmoons. I'd never knew of such carvings until she posted several she'd found in the wild. Afterwards, I was looking through a new book I'd bought titled, America B.C., by Barry Fell, and saw a section on a hand alphabet; kinda sorta like the hand symbols for letters that is used by the deaf.
I saw some, not all, of the other things you've pointed out, but didn't "mark" them to keep down the clutter.
Extraordinary stuff. The shear size of many of the Ancients' monuments is astounding.
Shortstack said:Seeker:
O.K., the little man is not a ghost and the photo is NOT faked. So, the figure was "painted" into the wood; probably a "wash" type of painting such as a white wash material for fences. (think Tom Sawyer) I changed the photo to black and white; then turned it into a negative. As you can see, the little man is still there.
I totally see what you are looking at. I think that it is really a coincidence and the area in question (white washed?) is actually sun-bleached wood. If it was colored it was done a long time as you have mentioned after the initial carvings. I think i will stick to the original information at this point in time because it relates more to the rest of the items leading up to it (in age and origin). I don't mean to look past your excellent information, just don't think that it has much to do with the task at hand. However, if upon closer on site inspection there is enough evidence suggesting your input is correct, then I guess I have another purpose on this site.
I was told that this tree had been modified negatively. My father suspects that it has something to do with a mission bell and a panel should have been inside of it.
Maybe I shouldn't ask this on an open forum, but..........could you father and his father been the last in a line of "Sentinels"?
...and if they were? Just pulling your chain. No chance that I can think of. My father happened upon some information to this site a while back and has confirmed everything that he was told will be there, and much more. I have taken it upon myself with his approval to try to get more specific details if possible from the supplied photos. I will be joining him again to go back and dig further into some things especially the stuff he may have over looked that I have had some ideas on based upon this forum and from people such as yourself.
Thank you so much for taking the time to review this thread as it is important to me in many ways.
Anyway, check out this negative and you can see he's still there.
As always respectfully,
~Seeker~
Shortstack said:
Old Dog said:Seeker,
All I can see in this picture is another cross.
Just plain and simple, very much like the others you have posted before.
desertmoons said:Smee.did you find the start of a trail there also by the triangle? I have a few doubts that a triangle like that...is from indigenous tribes of the past few hundred years.
Best Regards
DM