mummified petrified skull of a ?

boomer46901

Jr. Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Golden Thread
0

Attachments

  • head1.webp
    head1.webp
    19.3 KB · Views: 2,929
Well... a good mystery indeed!

In case this ends up being a skull, I'm lodging my vote for:

Young, underdeveloped, or partial skull from a otter, mink, fisher, ferret, or badger. :-\
 

Upvote 0
Montana Jim said:
Well... a good mystery indeed!

In case this ends up being a skull, I'm lodging my vote for:

Young, underdeveloped, or partial skull from a otter, mink, fisher, ferret, or badger. :-\
I am voting for a rock. GL and keep us posted!
 

Upvote 0
I'm not convinced it's a skull, either. Any indication that it was carved to look like a skull?

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
I don't know what it is. I don't think it is a skull. It may be a carving to resemble a skull. I would take it to a museum and have them look at it just to make sure.
 

Upvote 0
I suggest that you have it X-Rayed just to have a better point of view.
As we all know things were quite different a few million years ago.
Great find.
I also believe it is a skull.
Peg Leg
 

Upvote 0
Here's a couple of skulls.

Fossils

A dog and a rabbit.
 

Attachments

  • dognebraska.webp
    dognebraska.webp
    14.5 KB · Views: 2,117
  • rabbitwyoming.webp
    rabbitwyoming.webp
    15.2 KB · Views: 2,092
Upvote 0
I agree with others about it being a rock with some holes and cephalopod remains. The "nose" hole is a dead giveaway because skulls don't have round nasal cavities, always a two-holer look, or divided. Very small critters have very small nasal passages. Not being hateful here, just my opinion, been a rockhound and fossil collector a long tme. Still, it should clean up nice, a little work with a dremel tool and you got one heck of a conversation piece for the coffee shop.
 

Upvote 0
From the completely unlettered I like Angelos Wyoming rabbit. Knock that guys four front teeth out and he'd kinda look like an ancestor anyway.
 

Upvote 0
Looks similar to a ground squirrel skull to me. I looked a that collection of skulls and it now looks more like a bat to me because there are no identifiable k9 teeth or fangs. Monty
 

Upvote 0
Here are some more pics. The other side isn't as clear, but does display the same general feature. I think it more of a mummified head prior to fossilizing. thaty would explain the crushed shape. ANyway, its a good mystery. tahnks for all the chatter.
 

Attachments

  • head top.webp
    head top.webp
    20.7 KB · Views: 1,956
Upvote 0
Not sure, but to me, looks more like a rock....but, what do I know? Good luck finding the answer!
 

Upvote 0
99Brown said:
Not sure, but to me, looks more like a rock....but, what do I know? Good luck finding the answer!

With the additional photos, I tend to agree with this assessment. It's a (weird) rock. Bummer.
 

Upvote 0
You need to get to your nearest college and find a biology, paleontology or geology professor.

My assessment is that it has some characteristics of a fossilized skull, but without holding it, and examining it closely, I couldnt tell you.

IF it is, it is definately mammalian.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom