P.ALLEN
Hero Member
- Jun 8, 2017
- 642
- 811
- Detector(s) used
- AT Pro, Tesoro Compadre, Ace 250, CMS magnetics, Garrett pinpointer, Fiskars trenching spade.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
It's a comparison that I liken to a Ivy League prep school's attitude toward a community college. They feel superior for having a more expensive institution, as opposed to folks who can't afford/qualified to go there. Scientific law/theory is desired more than practical experience. I hiked a lot when my knees were good, long distance stuff, and I would report everything. Leave it alone is the mantra. I dunno if any of you saw the Aquachigger video set where he was out west on BLM land. Even tin cans were "Do not touch", with some federal entities the Archaeology positions are at very low #'s, and some of the folks are doing solo work for huge tracts of land. The "leave it alone" statements are usually because they have other pressing historic/pre-historic sights to focus on. NHPA or national historic preservation act sounds good, and to some degree it is, but all it means is if construction takes place on that land a survey has to be done, or if federal funds are used they have to do it. Recently in the last 8 years they were doing interstate improvement in East St. Louis/St Louis and found a "suburb" of Cahokia Mounds, they spent a LOT of time there and it helped increase our pre-historic knowledge of the Cahokia people. I did work on Fort Pickett in Virginia, a Stryker Brigade was coming in and they needed a huge amount of land surveyed. It had Civil War hospitals, German POW camps, native American sites to include Clovis sites. Everything was archived and sent to Fort Lee in Petersburg (Jefferson Davis's Funeral Wagon is there), it sits in boxes. And that's it for those sites. The POW camp is still there as are remnants of the hospitals, they left those alone (that's good). It's funny as in my Geology work we utilized Micro Gravity (a quick comparison is like a deep deep seeking metal detector) to locate voids in the rock for potential sinkhole collapse. If they are using that, why are Archaeologists not using Detectors regularly? Ivy League/Royal Academy type thought, or just ignorance to the importance of having it in your tool belt? This discussion is good dialogue. If we have an actual Fed/State/Academic Archaeologist on TN, your opinion/weight on this matter is encouraged.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: