Maybe We Can Agree?

[EE THr]

can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?
Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?
Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?

Punt

#22 again. Not impressive.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

Hmmmmmm.

No denials of this list, in over 24 hours.

So I guess all the LRL promoters here agree to it.

Thanks!

read and filed in the round container..Art

I'm glad that you agree to the list. Here it is, again, just for you---

So far, the only things the LRL promoters on here can agree on, are as follows---

1. They don't want the schematics of LRLs sent to electronic schools or colleges, for analysis by unbiased professionals.
2. They don't want the LRLs, themselves, sent to electronic schools or colleges, for analysis by unbiased professionals.
3. They don't want to state whether LRLs are dowsers, dowsing enhancers, or totally electronically operated devices; because if they defined what they are claiming, then the claims can be refuted.
4. They are deathly afraid of any kind of fair Scientific test, and tremble at the mention of "random double-blind" testing.
5. They don't like my "Predictable Patterns of Con Artists" list, because they can't avoid doing all the things listed on it!
6. Their best chance is to engage in personal attacks, of those who point out the simple fact that LRLs don't work, in hopes of creating an emotional response which will cause the challengers to follow them off-topic, and thus postpone the LRL promoters' eventual failure to perpetuate their frauds.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

artie---

And you accuse the "non-believers" of only posting insults?

Here's the topic question again, in case you missed it. I know you have been trying to!

Maybe We Can Agree

So, can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?

Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?

Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?

So, how about it? What is your definition?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Still waiting for you to define what you're making all your claims of finding treasure with....




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI: It was posted -->Still waiting for you to define what you're making all your claims of finding treasure with....*
***************
the final tool and phrase is 'a shovel', ya idjit heheheehhe

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[aarthrj3811]

HI: It was posted -->Still waiting for you to define what you're making all your claims of finding treasure with....*
***************
the final tool and phrase is 'a shovel', ya idjit heheheehhe

Don Jose de La Mancha

Your greatest post ever Real Deal..that is correct about a mandatory tool..I prefer a # 2 shovel.


A shovel is a tool for digging, lifting, and moving bulk materials, such as soil, coal, gravel, snow, sand, or ore. Shovels are extremely common tools that are used extensively in agriculture, construction, and gardening.
Most shovels are hand tools consisting of a broad blade with edges or sides that is fixed to a medium-length handle. Shovel blades are usually made of sheet steel or hard plastics and are very strong. Shovel handles are usually made of wood (especially specific varieties such as ash or maple) or glass-reinforced plastic (fibreglass).

 

[EE THr]

HI: It was posted -->Still waiting for you to define what you're making all your claims of finding treasure with....*
***************
the final tool and phrase is 'a shovel', ya idjit heheheehhe

Don Jose de La Mancha

Your greatest post ever Real Deal..that is correct about a mandatory tool..I prefer a # 2 shovel.


A shovel is a tool for digging, lifting, and moving bulk materials, such as soil, coal, gravel, snow, sand, or ore. Shovels are extremely common tools that are used extensively in agriculture, construction, and gardening.
Most shovels are hand tools consisting of a broad blade with edges or sides that is fixed to a medium-length handle. Shovel blades are usually made of sheet steel or hard plastics and are very strong. Shovel handles are usually made of wood (especially specific varieties such as ash or maple) or glass-reinforced plastic (fibreglass).

Any usless gibberish to avoid the original topic question!




But don't worry!

Here it is again!



Maybe We Can Agree

So, can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?

Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?

Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Any usless gibberish to avoid the original topic question!

Please tell us what you use to dig treasure ?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

swr, how do you dig up a treasure ?? on second thought that is why you have a female along. NO?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

Make a list of those replies that refer to the topic, and those that are way off on a tanget somewhere.

Then you will have two lists.

The ones that are on topic, are mostly by those who can normally discuss something, in a rational manner.

What are the people making the majority of the other posts doing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp~

the final tool and phrase is 'a shovel', ya idjit heheheehhe

~Art~

Your greatest post ever Real Deal..that is correct about a mandatory tool..I prefer a # 2 shovel.

~EE~

Any usless gibberish to avoid the original topic question!

~Art~

Please tell us what you use to dig treasure ?

~EE~

What are the people making the majority of the other posts doing?

We are discussing Treasure Hunting devices..That is our hobby..What is yours as you prove everyday you know nothing about what we want to discuss,,Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

Long Range Locators are not Treasure Hunting devices. They (Long Range Locators) have been proven to be fraudulent instruments, and in no way find treasure, or any metals.

Strange post..Most of the skeptics have admitted that we find treasure with our devices. So why have you spent over a year trying to tell us that they are just Dowsing Rods ?.Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Remember Art....I am not a skeptic. I am only posting in regards to the fraudulent electronics in these devices.

So you admit that we can find Treasure at a distance with these devices..How can the electronics be fraudulent if we find treasure at a distance with them ?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Art~

Strange post..Most of the skeptics have admitted that we find treasure with our devices. So why have you spent over a year trying to tell us that they are just Dowsing Rods ?.Art

~SWR~

Remember Art....I am not a skeptic. I am only posting in regards to the fraudulent electronics in these devices.

~ART~

So you admit that we can find Treasure at a distance with these devices..How can the electronics be fraudulent if we find treasure at a distance with them ?

~SWR~

Please quote/post where SWR admitted you can find Treasure at a distance with these devices.

There are SWR

 

[aarthrj3811]

Art. You need to stop fabricating stories. Making a lair our of yourself does not help you cause.
At no point, did SWR ever post, or "admit" you can find treasure with these devices.

Could you please post just what you think my “cause” is ?
While you are at it please tells why you are posting on T-Net (Cause)?

 

[EE THr]

~Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp~

the final tool and phrase is 'a shovel', ya idjit heheheehhe

~Art~

Your greatest post ever Real Deal..that is correct about a mandatory tool..I prefer a # 2 shovel.

~EE~

Any usless gibberish to avoid the original topic question!

~Art~

Please tell us what you use to dig treasure ?

~EE~

What are the people making the majority of the other posts doing?

We are discussing Treasure Hunting devices..That is our hobby..What is yours as you prove everyday you know nothing about what we want to discuss,,Art

Treasure hunting devices? You can call a rabbit's foot a treasure hunting device!

But you have yet to prove that your LRLs are treasure finding devices.

The Section if for discussing the LRLs themselves, not people.

Any time someone points out that your LRLs don't work, you try to switch the topic to discussing people, instead of the devices. Your attempts to change the subject show that you cannot prove your claims. Well, that, and the fact that you won't even try to pass a double-blind test!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?[/

 

[aarthrj3811]

Any time someone points out that your LRLs don't work, you try to switch the topic to discussing people, instead of the devices. Your attempts to change the subject show that you cannot prove your claims. Well, that, and the fact that you won't even try to pass a double-blind test!

I think it is just the opposite..Every time someone wants to discuss uses of LRL’s we are referred back to a fake double blind test or to your insult page..Art
Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?[/

 

[EE THr]

Any time someone points out that your LRLs don't work, you try to switch the topic to discussing people, instead of the devices. Your attempts to change the subject show that you cannot prove your claims. Well, that, and the fact that you won't even try to pass a double-blind test!

I think it is just the opposite..Every time someone wants to discuss uses of LRL’s we are referred back to a fake double blind test or to your insult page..Art
Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?[/

Where does it say that this Section is for discussions of the uses of LRLs?

 

[EE THr]

It's time to say that, in reference to the topic question, there is nothing that the LRL promoters on here want to agree with.

Not a definition of what their LRL devices actually are, as in the Original Post.

Not an outline of what a fair test of LRLs, to back up their braggings, would be.

Not an average reliability rate of their LRLs, by way of an average percentage of success.

In short, not anything which would show, one way or another, the validity of all of their fantastic claims about these supposed and mysterious "Long Range Locators." All of their LRLs are just plastic boxes with nothing inside that actually do anything to find a target of any kind.

They don't want any college to test their LRL devices.

They don't want any college to evaluate the schematics of their LRL devices.

They won't choose any college to check these things, because they know that they are frauds!


It doesn't get any plainer than that!

 

[aarthrj3811]

Are you telling us that you have no proof without us providing it ?
We know that you have no proof so please stop begging..Art

 

[EE THr]

Are you telling us that you have no proof without us providing it ?
We know that you have no proof so please stop begging..Art

Unfortunately, your evaluation of my position is all wrong, Art.

I really don't want proof, anymore.

Because it's way too late for that.

Your LRL devices have already been shown to contain nothing but junk, both physically and schematically. Your "magic calculator" has been shown to output nothing but inherent, low-level random noise. The theory of operation offered for LRLs is total pseudoscience mumbo-jumbo and wishful thinking.

And, to top it all off, you've already done everything there is on the Predictable Pattern of Con Artists list.

The days of debate, insults from LRL promoters, and nonsensical posts which don't relate to either the topic or the post you are replying to, are all over and done.

Nothing about LRLs will do you any good anymore.

You're Fired!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?