Maybe We Can Agree?

[EE THr]

It's been four days since I posted the OP question.

Apparently there is no LRL promoter who knows what his device is, or what it is supposed to do.






artie---

If you want proof...I would say that this is definitely it!







Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

"Scientific Proof of Scientific Claims Advocate (SPSCA)"..Pretender

Apparently there is no LRL promoter who knows what his device is, or what it is supposed to do.

My LRL’s find Treasure..According to you that is what they are supposed to do..So where's the problem ?

 

[EE THr]

artie---

The Original Post asks for agreement to a definition, or make up your own definition.

It's in the last few sentences.

That's the problem.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Allo peeps, EE, prong, was the last post any better? I settled for 150 characters since I am limited
to only 10 -15 lines vertically ?

Will use another character for paragraph spacing.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

RDT---

Everything seems to be fine now.

Thanks.

 

[pronghorn]

Allo peeps, EE, prong, was the last post any better? I settled for 150 characters since I am limited
to only 10 -15 lines vertically ?

Will use another character for paragraph spacing.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I still had to scroll right about 2 inches but that is not a problem
compared to having to scroll the whole width of the screen
on every line.
Thanks for the effort,
now if we can talk 10,000 others into doing the same we'll
have a good start.
I can run a post forever vertically so I don't understand
how it is that you are limited vertically,
but it really isn't important.

 

[EE THr]

Maybe We Can Agree

So, can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?

Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?

Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?

Well, it's been almost a week now, and noooooooooooooooo LRLers want to say what their devices actually are?

Gosh, I wonder why not?








Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

How is this Prong. I know how you feel on extended lines to the right XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
apol, honest.

As for the vertical I have no idea since it only is applicable here. Every where else it is just fine.

Don Jose

 

[EE THr]

RDT---

Is that the problem where, when writing a post, it will only take you down to a certain point, and after that you can't see what you're writing?

Because it did that to me when I first started posting.

I don't know what I did to change it, but it doesn't do that for me anymore.

 

[EE THr]

"Scientific Proof of Scientific Claims Advocate (SPSCA)"..Pretender

Apparently there is no LRL promoter who knows what his device is, or what it is supposed to do.

My LRL’s find Treasure..According to you that is what they are supposed to do..So where's the problem ?

That's another #11 for you artie.

So you don't have any idea of what your LRL device really is?

Is that why you never answered the Original Post on this topic?





P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

So, can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?

Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?

Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?

Why should I answer these questions again…If you did not understand the answers the first dozen times that’s your problem,,

That's another #11 for you artie.

11. The California says that because he is successful, he doesn't need to prove anything.


So you don't have any idea of what your LRL device really is?

Is that why you never answered the Original Post on this topic?
Insult page…Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE: you posted --> Is that the problem where, when writing a post, it will only take you down to a certain point, and after that you can't see what you're writing?

Because it did that to me when I first started posting.

'I don't know what I did to change it', but it doesn't do that for me anymore.

************
sigh EE, yes but you aren't a h---- of a lot of help he he he

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

RDT---

Yeah, I know. I really didn't notice exactly when it stopped doing it to me, so I don't know if I changed something, or it was due to an automatic update of something, or what.

But at least you know that I experienced it also, and it did change on my end, I guess a few months ago.

One thing you can do, is type your posts into WordPad, then paste them into the message box. But I know that can be a hassle, especially if you include links or quotes.

The main thing is, it's not happening to everyone, and mine did change, so there must be some way to change it from happening to you. But what that is, I don't know.

Maybe someone else knows....

 

[EE THr]

Uh oh!

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Here is a novel idea....use the frigging' Quote button. And then start typing the reply. Thousands do it who are not MENSA qualified or held Officer status in the United States Armed Forces. Thousands are even children and have no issues.
Seems like the only three people on TreasureNet who cannot use the Quote button/feature are Joseph, Art and femixdigger. There is a pattern

Thank You SWR..I see you are still crying..Poor guy is sad because we do not give him enough to spin and twist..Art

 

[EE THr]

artie---

And you accuse the "non-believers" of only posting insults?

Here's the topic question again, in case you missed it. I know you have been trying to!

Maybe We Can Agree

So, can it be agreed that the free-swinging pointer type of LRLs are supposed to be dowsing enhancers?

Or can we agree that they are totally electronic devices, and not dowsing based?

Or, is there a better definition of the free-swinging pointer types of LRLs?

So, how about it? What is your definition?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Maybe We Can Agree?

No we do not agree..Art

 

[EE THr]

artie---

I suspect that the reason you do not want to agree to a definition of LRLs is because you want to reserve the ability to change your mind as the occasion suits you.

Not very Scientific.

Or logical.

Or honest.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

I suspect that the reason you do not want to agree to a definition of LRLs is because you want to reserve the ability to change your mind as the occasion suits you.

In the parlance of criminal justice, a suspect is a known person suspected of committing a crime.
Police and reporters often incorrectly use the word suspect when referring to the perpetrator of the offense (perp for short). The perpetrator is the robber, assailant, counterfeiter, etc. --the person who actually committed the crime. The distinction between suspect and perpetrator recognizes that the suspect is not known to have committed the offense, while the perpetrator -- who may not yet have been suspected of the crime, and is thus not necessarily a suspect -- is the one who actually did. The suspect may be a different person from the perpetrator, or there may have been no actual crime, which would mean there is no perpetrator.
A common error in police reports is a witness description of the suspect (as a witness generally describes the perpetrator, while a mug shot is of the suspect). Frequently it is stated that police are looking for the suspect, when there is no suspect; the police may be looking for a suspect, but they are surely looking for the perpetrator, and very often it is impossible to tell from such a police report whether there is a suspect or not.
Possibly because of the misuse of suspect to mean perpetrator, police have begun to use person of interest, possible suspect, and even possible person of interest, to mean suspect.
Under the judicial systems of the U.S., once a decision is approved to arrest a suspect, or bind him over for trial, either by a prosecutor issuing an information, a grand jury issuing a true bill or indictment, or a judge issuing an arrest warrant, the suspect can then be properly called a defendant, or the accused. Only after being convicted is the suspect properly called the perpetrator.

 

[EE THr]

artie---




Thanks.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?