- Jun 27, 2004
- 551
- 1,010
I know you didn't direct this to me, but I thought i'd share a few thoughts just the same.Mike, what's your take on the LUE ? You've done a lot of real research into the history of Church & Conquest in the Americas - have you seen anything in archive texts or field discoveries that would support the idea of mammoth-sized caches of gold and\or silver ingots buried in the present-day SW of USA?
The only primary source material I've seen is what's printed by KVM and it's full of contradictions and references to older books and newspaper articles and past events (like the FBI supposedly soliciting the public's help by printing the map in newspapers) that no one has ever been able to track or pin down.. perhaps the only exception being The Scarlett Shadow book by Walter Hurt. KVM refers to the LUE as one of the great treasure legends of the Americas if not The Greatest... yet there are no similar treasure legends I've heard of where people pull lumps of gold out of the ground like they're potato farmers.
What say you ?
*MAJOR flaw of the LUE is that most of the source material came from Karl or was printed by Karl through his own treasure tabloid (NPG). I'd agree 100% with this point. Minimally it creates a lot of doubt (reasonably).
*Karl has also made it clear the LUE has been reported and referred to under other names. I'm about 98% certain he's referring to the Treasure Mountain "Frenchmen's" treasure. It has the elements of on the ground treasure markers, a cryptic waybill, multiple cache sites, and the presence of slash marks, monuments, etc. in that area is well documented in Cornelius' book, "Sheepherder's Gold."
*I don't think there are many contradictions with Karl's reporting, he didn't share enough for there to be frankly.
*Karl never suggested the FBI was involved in the LUE that I'm aware. That aspect of the story was conflated by a T-Net poster who studied the LUE extensively, he's the same one that attributed Nazi connections to the cache. He similarly "cross-pollinated" the LUE with the 17 tons of gold story which is not only a different story, but hundreds of miles west of the LUE ground zero.
*Much of what we know that is confusing about the LUE was introduced by Tom Hilton in his early 1970's article "debunking" the LUE. Reality is, he's the first to suggest it was "40 acres of gold", I've never seen another reference to this. Hilton wrote his article 2 or 3 years after failing on multiple attempts to find the treasure. His work is rife with problems.