Large Clovis Point Please Help!!

DFrank73

Greenie
Dec 13, 2024
18
11

Attachments

  • IMG_20241212_132826223_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20241212_132826223_HDR.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 48
  • IMG_20241212_132834899_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20241212_132834899_HDR.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 48
Upvote 4
Sorry that I said auction instead of estate sale. What did the estate have it marked at (not asking what you paid, only what they were asking)

I wish you the best but don't get your hopes up until it is authenticated by a reputable authenticator. As stated it has a lot of red flags, but that doesn't mean it's not authentic, only that there are a lot of red flags to an experienced collector or buyer.
It wasn't marked It was in the box wrapped up I paid 800 dollars for a box of megalodon teeth it was in there at bottom wrapped up in old newspaper
 

Here is an authentic Clovis with expected damage. It is also made of Knife River Flint. The patination is readily evident. It was found in N. Dakota by a fossil hunter. This gives you an idea of what a 12,000+ year old point looks like. Many are found in much better condition. Also there is a fossil forum here as well, please post pics of the Megs.
20241214_144935.jpg
20241214_144928.jpg
20241214_144954.jpg
 

Last edited:
I forgot how many artifacts I posted one time on TN 2 or 3, one was a stone pipe 1 banner stone and something else members said they looked modern. Any way I had shipped them off to be authenticated before checking here first. Got them back all 3 were museum Quality reproductions lol. Good luck.
 

I forgot how many artifacts I posted one time on TN 2 or 3, one was a stone pipe 1 banner stone and something else members said they looked modern. Any way I had shipped them off to be authenticated before checking here first. Got them back all 3 were museum Quality reproductions lol. Good luck.
Thank you mine shaft I will do just that I bet they were all baffled
 

Thank you mine shaft I will do just that I bet they were all baffled
Reminds me of a time I purchased a 1858 Remington engraved and gold washed cylinder with mother of pearl grips I got it cheap it was pristine turns out everyone thought it was fake because it was in immaculate condition to good to be true museum piece
 

It is also made of Knife River Flint like yours.
That’s not Knife River Flint. It’s Flint River material from GA. This biface I made is the same material. Mine is not heated. The Clovis is obviously heated. Paleo Indians NEVER heat treated flint to make points. That point is newly made. I’ve only been knapping since 1985. I know a little.😉
IMG_7921.jpeg
 

It wasn't an auction it was at an estate sale in a box of megalodon teeth it was wrapped in an old deteriorating newspaper from the 1958
I just watched a show about these divers searching and finding megalodon teeth.
 

That’s not Knife River Flint. It’s Flint River material from GA. This biface I made is the same material. Mine is not heated. The Clovis is obviously heated. Paleo Indians NEVER heat treated flint to make points. That point is newly made. I’ve only been knapping since 1985. I know a little.😉View attachment 2183467
Where are you getting the heat treated from
 

Last edited:
View attachment 2183566View attachment 2183567
FYI, ToddsPoint is correct.. Clovis points were not heat treated

View attachment 2183566View attachment 2183567
FYI, ToddsPoint is correct.. Clovis points were not heat treated
I Don't understand where Toddspoint gets the Clovis that is pictured was heat treated.And nobody ever said that the paleo Indian's ever heat treated Clovis points.If you research you will see there is proof the paleo Indian's heat treated stone and knapped it heat treating goes back like 70k BP
 

I am certainly not the expert here, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why many responded the way they did knowing you came to them with the question.....you do remember your own question, don't you. :BangHead:
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Latest Discussions

    Back
    Top