aarthrj3811
Gold Member
Thank You for your opinion 2screwed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
~Art~Art quoting people out of context and then giving one line answers to the the out of context quotes does not help you prove your point
~2screwed~.I try to give one sentence answers so as not to give them anything to duck or spin...
~2screwed~Why do you quote people out of context then?
~Art~Why do you quote people out of context?
I try to give one sentence answers so as not to give them anything to duck or spin...
Has been answered~marc~
Is there a Long Range Locator capable of this?
I know 3 chests of gold are buried - somewhere within 300 acres... at 8 feet deep. There is no (or very little) iron buried with the cache.
How do I locate them?
That is correct Rick59. If you have months to search 300 acres...With some of the LRL’s you could stand in one corner of the property and sweep the entire 300 acres in minutes..ArtGet a two coil deep seeking detector made by Whites ,Fisher and a two coil unit for the Garrett GTI 2500! These detectors would more than likely find your treasure.
That is correct Rick59. If you have months to search 300 acres...With some of the LRL’s you could stand in one corner of the property and sweep the entire 300 acres in minutes..Art
Yes I agree that a two-box may find the treasure if you can search the entire 300 acres. The draw back is the areas where you cannot search..deep bush and steep areas. You could never be sure that you have searched the entire 13 million square feet. I have learned that legends are based on true stories. Names of landmarks and the description of the area have changed over the years...Yep, ya sure could.
Art and I may disagree about a lot of stuff, but that we agree on.
I certainly don't try to sell them some snake oil. You defend these things just like a psychic tries to defend their "visions".What do you guys do with your old Detectors when you decide to upgrade?...Art
OK... Legal burden of proof - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He who does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption, meaning he needs no evidence to support his claim. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.
That puts the proof on the skeptics..
Yes we have read the 1000 assumptions from the skeptics but have saw no convictions for sells of fraudulent goods or who is himself or herself a fraud, quack, charlatan, and the like. ...ArtFulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.
You are correct..I think these guys set around a pickle barrel all day...I think they are still discussing if a door to door dowsing rod salesman convinced a farmers wife to run away with him...Art~0lfacere~
Skepticism is healthy, but there is no room for armchair scientists who demand to be shown that something works without having to investigate it themselves. It's all just a back-and-forth argument that amounts to nothing until someone who knows nothing decides that it's time to experiment. When you know the truth for yourself, the argument becomes a lot less important.
I think they are still discussing if a door to door dowsing rod salesman convinced a farmers wife to run away with him...Art
Skepticism is healthy, but there is no room for armchair scientists who demand to be shown that something works without having to investigate it themselves.
| |
Someone who has no professional training in science yet has the same augmented ego and clout (and on occasion, the same amount of knowledge on the subject). Your subconscious is actually the excrement of an opalescent Monodon monoceros. I know. I'm an armchair scientist. Narwhal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The narwhal, or narwhale, (Monodon monoceros) is a medium-sized toothed whale that lives year-round in the Arctic. |
Skepticism is healthy, but there is no room for armchair scientists who demand to be shown that something works without having to investigate it themselves.
Why not?